UK House of Lords backs mandatory digital asset strategy over Labour position

cointelegraphPublicado em 2026-09-10Última atualização em 2026-09-10

Resumo

The UK House of Lords has passed an amendment mandating the government to formulate a comprehensive digital asset strategy, despite opposition from the ruling Labour party. The amendment, added to the Financial Services and Markets Bill, requires the Treasury to develop, publish, and consult on a strategy covering cryptoassets, stablecoins, and tokenized securities within 12 months of the bill becoming law. The strategy must address innovation, consumer protection, and firms' access to financial services. While the Labour government argued it already has a strategy in place, proponents of the amendment believe a statutory framework is necessary to build a cohesive digital asset economy. The bill now returns to the House of Commons for further consideration of the Lords' changes.

The UK House of Lords backed an amendment requiring the government to develop a digital asset strategy, in a 194–138 vote on Wednesday, despite the Labour government’s opposition to the measure.

The amendment was added to the Financial Services and Markets Bill during its Report Stage on Wednesday. The bill is progressing through Parliament and would make broader changes to the UK’s financial services regulatory framework.

Amendment 88, introduced by Conservative peer Baroness Neville-Rolfe, would require the Treasury to prepare, publish and consult on a digital asset strategy within 12 months of the Financial Services and Markets Bill becoming law.

The strategy would cover cryptoassets, stablecoins and tokenized securities, while addressing issues including innovation, consumer protection and firms’ access to banking, payment and settlement services.

The vote follows months of debate over the UK’s approach to digital assets. During a July debate, Treasury’s Minister for Investment, Lord Stockwood, pushed back on calls for a statutory framework, saying the government believed it already had a digital asset strategy and was executing it.

The ruling Labour party opposed the amendment because they believed it did not adequately address the rapid development of digital assets and the need for a cohesive regulatory framework.

The UK Cryptoasset Business Council, which said it worked with lawmakers on the amendment, welcomed the vote on Thursday, highlighting Lord Chris Holmes’ question of whether the UK is “simply regulating digital assets” or “building a digital assets economy.”

The bill must still return to the House of Commons, where lawmakers can accept, amend or reject the Lords’ changes.

Magazine: 10 of the greatest unsolved crypto mysteries

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat did the UK House of Lords vote to require the government to do?

AThe UK House of Lords voted to require the government to develop, publish, and consult on a digital asset strategy within 12 months of the Financial Services and Markets Bill becoming law.

QWho introduced Amendment 88 to the Financial Services and Markets Bill?

AAmendment 88 was introduced by Conservative peer Baroness Neville-Rolfe.

QWhy did the ruling Labour party oppose the amendment?

AThe ruling Labour party opposed the amendment because they believed it did not adequately address the rapid development of digital assets and the need for a cohesive regulatory framework.

QWhat areas must the proposed digital asset strategy cover according to the amendment?

AThe strategy would cover cryptoassets, stablecoins, and tokenized securities, addressing issues including innovation, consumer protection, and firms' access to banking, payment, and settlement services.

QWhat is the next step for the Financial Services and Markets Bill after the House of Lords vote?

AThe bill must return to the House of Commons, where lawmakers can accept, amend, or reject the changes made by the House of Lords.

Leituras Relacionadas

Trading

Spot
活动图片