Truth, Bubbles, and Illusions: Looking Back at the 2025 Crypto Report Card

比推Publicado em 2026-01-12Última atualização em 2026-01-12

Resumo

Based on the article "Truth, Bubbles, and Illusions: A Look Back at the 2025 Crypto Report Card," here is a summary of its main points: The author reflects on their 2025 predictions for the crypto market. They admit to being wrong about Bitcoin's peak in Q4, as the cycle held, and wrong about a memecoin or AI agent supercycle, as retail investors favored traditional assets like gold and AI stocks instead. The AI x Crypto narrative saw mixed results with project development but poor token performance, and NFTs were declared "dead." Key insights from 2025 include: 1. **Bitcoin ETFs acted as a floor, not a ceiling:** Massive selling by long-term holders created a $95B supply overhang, causing BTC to underperform. However, its correlation with traditional risk assets fell, which is bullish long-term. 2. **Airdrops are not dead:** Nearly $4.5B was airdropped in 2025 (e.g., Story Protocol, Berachain). The game has shifted towards requiring more focused, high-conviction farming due to points fatigue and better Sybil detection. 3. **Fee switches set a price floor, not an engine for growth:** Token buybacks from fees establish a bottom price but don't guarantee appreciation, as seen with UNI's price action. The market treats everything as a trade. 4. **Stablecoins gained traction for payments, but "proxy trading" was difficult:** Stablecoins like USDT saw real-world adoption for payments. However, investing in related equities (e.g., Circle's IPO) proved challenging, as gains we...

Author: Ignas

Compilation: Plain Talk Blockchain

Original Title: Crypto Truth and Lies: A Review of the 2025 Report Card


A year ago, I wrote "Truth and Lies of the 2025 Crypto Market".

At that time, everyone was sharing higher Bitcoin price targets. I wanted to find a different framework to discover where the public might be wrong and to position myself differently. The goal was simple: to seek out ideas that already existed but were overlooked, disliked, or misunderstood.

Before sharing the 2026 edition, here is a clear review of what truly mattered in 2025. What we got right, what we got wrong, and what we should learn from it. If you don't examine your own thinking, you're not investing, you're guessing.

Quick Summary

  • "BTC Peaked in Q4": Most people expected this, but it seemed too good to be true. Turns out they were right, and I was wrong (and paid the price). Unless BTC skyrockets from here and breaks the 4-year cycle pattern, I'll concede this one.

  • "Retail Prefers Memecoins": The truth is, retail doesn't prefer crypto at all. They bought gold, silver, AI stocks, and anything that wasn't cryptocurrency. The supercycle for memecoins or AI Agents also did not materialize.

  • "AI x Crypto Remains Strong": Mixed results. Projects continued to deliver, the x402 standard evolved, and funding continued. But tokens failed to sustain any rallies.

  • "NFTs Are Dead": Yes.

These are easy to review in hindsight. The real insights lie in the following five larger themes.

1. Spot ETFs Are the Floor, Not the Ceiling

Since March 2024, long-term Bitcoin holders (OGs) have sold approximately 1.4 million BTC, worth about $121.17 billion.

Imagine the bloodbath in the crypto market without ETFs: Despite the decline in price, BTC ETF inflows remained positive ($26.9 billion).

The gap of about $95 billion is precisely why BTC underperformed almost all macro assets. There's nothing wrong with BTC itself; you don't even need to dig deep into unemployment or manufacturing data to explain it—it's just the "great rotation" by whales and "4-year cycle believers".

More importantly, Bitcoin's correlation with traditional risk assets like the Nasdaq fell to its lowest since 2022 (-0.42). While everyone hoped for an upward breakout in correlation, in the long run, this is bullish as an uncorrelated portfolio asset sought by institutions.

There are signs the supply shock is over. Therefore, I dare to predict a BTC price of $174,000 for 2026 (equivalent to 10% of gold's market cap).

2. Airdrops Clearly "Did Not" Disappear

The crypto community (CT) once again claimed airdrops were dead. But in 2025, we saw nearly $4.5 billion in large airdrop distributions:

  • Story Protocol (IP): ~$1.4B

  • Berachain (BERA): ~$1.17B

  • Jupiter (JUP): ~$7.91M

  • Animecoin (ANIME): ~$7.11M

The changes are: points fatigue, stronger Sybil detection, and lower valuations. You also need to "claim and sell" to maximize returns.

2026 will be a big year for airdrops, with heavyweights like Polymarket, Metamask, Base(?) preparing to launch tokens. This is not the year to stop clicking buttons, but to stop betting blindly. Airdrop "farming" requires concentrated effort on high-conviction bets.

3. Fee Switches Are Not Price Appreciation Engines, They Are the Floor

My prediction was: Fee switches won't automatically drive token prices up. Most protocols don't generate enough revenue to support their massive market caps.

"The fee switch doesn't affect how high the token can go; it sets a 'floor price'."

Look at the projects ranked by "Holder Revenue" on DeFillama: Except for $HYPE, all high revenue-share tokens outperformed ETH (though ETH is now the benchmark everyone challenges).

The surprise was $UNI. Uniswap finally flipped the switch and even burned $100 million worth of tokens. UNI initially surged 75% but then gave back all its gains.

Three revelations:

Token buybacks set a price floor, not a ceiling.

Everything this cycle is a trade (refer to UNI's pump and dump).

Buybacks are only one side of the story; sell pressure (unlocks) must be considered, as most tokens are still low float.

4. Stablecoins Capture Mindshare, But "Proxy Trading" Is Hard to Monetize

Stablecoins are going mainstream. When I rented a motorbike in Bali, the owner even asked for payment in USDT on TRON.

Although USDT's dominance fell from 67% to 60%, its market cap is still growing. Citibank predicts the stablecoin market cap could reach $1.9 to $4 trillion by 2030.

In 2025, the narrative shifted from "trading" to "payment infrastructure". However, trading the stablecoin narrative wasn't easy: Circle's IPO gave back all its gains after an initial surge, and other proxy assets also underperformed.

One truth of 2025: Everything is just a trade.

Currently, crypto payment cards are exploding due to their convenience in bypassing strict bank AML requirements. Every card swipe is a transaction on-chain. If direct peer-to-peer payments bypassing Visa/Mastercard emerge in 2026, that would be a 1000x opportunity.

5. DeFi Is More Centralized Than CeFi

This is a bold claim: DeFi's business and TVL concentration is higher than that of traditional finance (CeFi).

Aave commands over 60% of the lending market share (compared to JPMorgan's 12% in the US).

L2 protocols are mostly multi-billion dollar unregulated Multisigs.

Chainlink controls almost all value oracles in DeFi.

In 2025, the conflict between "centralized equity holders" and "token holders/DAO" became apparent. Who truly owns the protocol, IP rights, and revenue streams? The internal dispute at Aave showed that token holders have fewer rights than we thought.

If the "Labs" ultimately win, many DAO tokens will become uninvestable. 2026 will be a crucial year for aligning the interests of equity and token holders.

Summary

2025 proved one thing: Everything is a trade. Exit windows are extremely short. No token has long-term conviction.

As a result, 2025 marked the death of HODL culture, DeFi turned into Onchain Finance, and with improving regulation, DAOs are shedding their "pseudo-decentralized" disguise.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7601755

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the author's main prediction about Bitcoin's price cycle in 2025, and were they correct?

AThe author predicted that Bitcoin would peak in Q4 of 2025, but they were wrong. The market followed the expected four-year cycle, and the author admitted to paying the price for this incorrect prediction.

QAccording to the article, what was the state of the NFT market in 2025?

AThe article states that NFTs were dead in 2025, confirming the author's previous prediction.

QHow did the performance of tokens with fee switches (like UNI) compare to the author's expectations?

AThe author predicted that fee switches would not automatically drive token prices up but would instead set a price floor. This was confirmed when UNI initially surged 75% after its fee switch was activated but then gave back all its gains, showing that buybacks set a price bottom, not a ceiling.

QWhat significant shift occurred in the stablecoin narrative in 2025?

AThe narrative for stablecoins shifted from 'trading' to 'payment infrastructure' in 2025, as their use for real-world payments grew, exemplified by instances like a Balinese motorbike rental requesting payment in USDT on the TRON network.

QWhy does the author argue that DeFi is more centralized than CeFi?

AThe author argues that DeFi is more centralized due to extreme market concentration: Aave holds over 60% of the lending market share (compared to JPMorgan's 12% in the U.S.), L2 protocols are run by multi-sigs, and Chainlink dominates the oracle market for DeFi.

Leituras Relacionadas

US Stocks Suffer Worst Plunge Since 2025: Three Triggers Ignite Tech Stock Valuation Reset

The US stock market experienced its most severe sell-off since the 2025 tariff crisis on June 5th, 2025. The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18%, the S&P 500 fell 2.64%, and the Dow Jones dropped 695 points. The panic stemmed from three converging factors. First, Broadcom's earnings report ignited fears of a slowdown in AI growth. While its AI chip revenue surged 143% YoY to $10.8B, its Q3 AI revenue guidance of $16B fell short of the $17.2B consensus. This triggered a massive sector-wide sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing 10.26% and semiconductor stocks losing roughly $1.3 trillion in market value in a single day. Second, a shockingly strong May jobs report crushed hopes for Federal Reserve rate cuts. Non-farm payrolls added 172,000 jobs, doubling expectations. This robust data, combined with persistently high oil prices above $92/barrel due to the ongoing Iran war and blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, drastically increased market expectations for a potential Fed rate hike instead of a cut. Higher interest rates compress the valuations of growth-heavy tech stocks. Third, the prolonged Iran conflict continues to fuel inflationary pressures, complicating the Fed's policy decisions and undermining the "inflation is tamed" narrative. Together, these events challenged the twin pillars of the market rally: the "limitless AI growth" story and expectations for imminent monetary easing. The sell-off spread globally, impacting Asian and European markets and cryptocurrencies. The article posits this is likely a severe "valuation repricing" rather than the end of the AI story. The underlying demand for AI remains strong, but investor expectations for growth speed and the prices they are willing to pay are being recalibrated. Key upcoming factors include the June FOMC meeting, future AI company earnings, and developments in the Iran conflict.

marsbitHá 1h

US Stocks Suffer Worst Plunge Since 2025: Three Triggers Ignite Tech Stock Valuation Reset

marsbitHá 1h

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals Prediction markets are playing a significant role in the 2026 NBA Finals, particularly around the New York Knicks' unexpected 2-0 series lead. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen massive trading volumes, exceeding hundreds of millions of dollars on championship and related markets. Their influence extends beyond online trading. Kalshi's official partnership with Madison Square Garden has given it prominent physical branding at the arena. Furthermore, local businesses like The Jeffrey bar are using prediction market contracts to hedge the risk of game-result-based promotions, turning potential losses into manageable costs—a concept similar to the famous "Mattress Mack" strategy from traditional sports betting. These markets differentiate themselves by offering a wider, more entertainment-focused range of "event contracts" beyond typical game outcomes, such as predicting celebrity attendance. They also have broader accessibility across the U.S. compared to age- and location-restricted traditional sportsbooks. However, their rapid integration into sports raises regulatory and ethical questions. The NBA is cautiously engaging, discussing integrity frameworks with regulators like the CFTC. While the league permits minor investments like Giannis Antetokounmpo's stake in Kalshi, it advocates for strict rules to prevent insider trading. Many fans express concern on platforms like Reddit, fearing that the close ties between prediction markets, the league, and players could compromise the game's integrity. The NBA Finals has thus become a high-stakes testing ground, showcasing prediction markets' commercial potential while challenging traditional boundaries between financial trading, entertainment, and gambling.

marsbitHá 3h

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals

marsbitHá 3h

Recursive Self-Improvement AI Gains Traction, Google Pours Cold Water, While DeepSeek and Others Approach the Fringes

The term "recursive self-improvement" (RSI), where AI improves itself autonomously, is gaining momentum in the AI industry. Startups like Recursive Superintelligence and projects such as Andrej Karpathy's Auto-Research aim to create systems where AI designs, implements, and validates its own research, moving toward superintelligence. While Google CEO Sundar Pichai cautions that such exponential acceleration is not yet a reality, progress is evident. For instance, Anthropic reported its Claude Code writes nearly 100% of the team's code, though it still lacks true self-direction. Analysts frame RSI development in stages: "adequacy" (systems functioning without humans), "parity" (matching human research quality), and "supremacy" (exceeding human-AI collaboration). Reaching parity could trigger rapid, unpredictable advancement due to AI's continuous operation. In China, companies like DeepSeek and Baidu incorporate self-optimization techniques without explicitly branding them as RSI, focusing on algorithmic efficiency and reinforcement learning. However, challenges remain, including "model collapse" from training on AI-generated data and the immense computational and open-collaboration requirements. Ultimately, RSI represents a trend of increasing automation in AI development, potentially reducing human oversight in the creation process itself.

marsbitHá 3h

Recursive Self-Improvement AI Gains Traction, Google Pours Cold Water, While DeepSeek and Others Approach the Fringes

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片