Trust Wallet Launches Address Poisoning Protection

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-10Última atualização em 2026-03-10

Resumo

Trust Wallet has launched a new security feature called Address Poisoning Protection to safeguard users from a common crypto scam. The tool, available on mobile across over 32 EVM chains, scans transactions in real-time to detect fraudulent addresses and alerts users before they send funds. It uses intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to identify known scam addresses and provides a side-by-side comparison to highlight differences. This initiative responds to the rising threat of address poisoning, where scammers send small transactions from similar-looking addresses to trick users. Trust Wallet estimates 34,000 such attacks occur hourly, targeting millions. The feature builds on the wallet’s existing security stack, including a transaction-risk tool introduced in 2023. Other platforms like Ledger Live and Safe also offer similar protections against this growing threat.

Trust Wallet has rolled out a new security feature to safeguard users from a common type of crypto scam known as address poisoning. The feature will be accessible on Trust Wallet for mobile over 32 EVM chains, with extra chains planned.

As per the publication, the new Trust Address Poisoning Protection will instinctively scan user transactions to detect false addresses and alert users before any false funds are sent, a scam that comprises sending small transactions from similar wallet addresses to trick users into copying the wrong place.

The tool will leverage aggregated intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to verify known scam and similar addresses. It will also make a side-by-side comparison to show where the addresses differ.

The chief executive officer of Trust Wallet, Felix Fan, mentioned that the threat is made to be invisible: a few characters buried in the middle of a long string, easy to miss and expensive to ignore.

Others To Permit Automatic Transaction

Address Poisoning Protection is the response to that reality: automatic, real-time alerts that offer users the information they need before they act. Chainalysis has reported recently that around $17 billion was lost to crypto scams in 2025, mainly influenced by the rise of AI-enabled impersonation tactics.

Trust Wallet is not the sole entity to permit automatic transaction protections. Ledger Live, for instance, provides “clear signing” to give complete transaction details along with a whitelisting option for trusted addresses.

Safe, which also provides some address poisoning safeguarding, mentioned that this form of “spoofing” is comparatively new and has been a surging issue in the past few years. Security firm Cyvers mentioned that it has been finding over 1 million address-poisoning preparations per day on Ethereum, while Trust approximates 34,000 attacks occur every hour, aiming at 17 million victims, as per the spokesperson.

For its part, Trust Wallet mentions Address Poisoning Protection is set to be made on its current security stack, comprising a transaction-level risk tool launched in 2023.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Nasdaq Collaboration Targets Pan-European Tokenized Securities Trading and Settlement

TagsChainalysisScamTrust Wallet

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new security feature launched by Trust Wallet and what does it protect against?

ATrust Wallet has launched a new security feature called Address Poisoning Protection to safeguard users from a common type of crypto scam known as address poisoning.

QHow does the Address Poisoning Protection feature work to alert users?

AThe feature instinctively scans user transactions to detect false addresses and alerts users before any false funds are sent. It makes a side-by-side comparison to show where the addresses differ.

QWhich security firms' intelligence does the new Trust Wallet tool leverage?

AThe tool leverages aggregated intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to verify known scam and similar addresses.

QAccording to the article, how many address-poisoning attacks does Trust Wallet estimate occur every hour?

ATrust Wallet approximates that 34,000 address-poisoning attacks occur every hour.

QBesides Trust Wallet, name another entity mentioned that provides automatic transaction protection.

ALedger Live is another entity that provides automatic transaction protections, such as 'clear signing' and a whitelisting option for trusted addresses.

Leituras Relacionadas

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHá 6m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHá 6m

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinistHá 1h

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinistHá 1h

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinistHá 1h

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinistHá 1h

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinistHá 1h

Bitcoin: Will a $130.5M whale move derail BTC’s push toward $70K?

A long-term Bitcoin whale moved 2,000 BTC (worth $130.5 million), transferring 800 BTC to an OTC desk (Cumberland) and 1,200 BTC to new addresses. While this suggests a potential partial sale, it did not negatively impact BTC's price, which continued its bullish trend to around $66,195. Technical indicators like the Stochastic Momentum Index and Squeeze Momentum Indicator remain positive, supporting a potential push toward $70,000. However, on-chain metrics show rising pressure. The Bitcoin Fund Flow Ratio and Exchange Netflow have turned positive, indicating increased inflows to exchanges. This typically raises the risk of short-term selling, which could weaken momentum and potentially test support near $64,800 if profit-taking persists.

ambcryptoHá 2h

Bitcoin: Will a $130.5M whale move derail BTC’s push toward $70K?

ambcryptoHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow