Trump, the "Stock Market Manipulator" in U.S. Stocks, Lifts Up the Entire Quantum Computing Sector

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-27Última atualização em 2026-05-27

Resumo

"Trump, the 'U.S. Stock Market Mastermind,' Boosts the Entire Quantum Computing Sector" This article details how former U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and public statements have significantly influenced the stock market, particularly in the quantum computing sector. A key example is the U.S. government's direct investment in Intel stock in August 2025, which yielded over $45 billion in gains within seven months. Trump publicly credited himself for this profit. Recently, the Trump administration announced a new $2 billion initiative. Through the Department of Commerce, funding from the CHIPS and Science Act will be provided to nine quantum computing companies in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes. The recipients include IBM ($1B for its subsidiary Anderon), GlobalFoundries ($375M), and listed companies like D-Wave, Infleqtion, and Rigetti ($100M each). Private firms such as Atom Computing and PsiQuantum also received $100M. This "investment-for-equity" strategy marks a shift from pure subsidies to an "active investor" model under the CHIPS Act. The announcement immediately boosted quantum computing stocks. The article frames this as part of Trump's "America First" industrial policy, aimed at securing U.S. technological leadership, similar to past investments in semiconductors, rare earths, and lithium. The author suggests this pattern of government-backed market intervention, alongside Trump's personal stock endorsements, is a hallmark of his appro...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

Last August, driven by Trump, the U.S. government completed the conversion of funds through the CHIPS Act, directly purchasing nearly 10% of Intel's newly issued original shares (approximately 433.3 million shares) at $20.47 per share. At that time, the value was less than $9 billion; by early May less than a year later, as Intel's stock price hit a record high, the total value of those shares had reached $54.1 billion, increasing by over $45 billion in just seven months.

Mentioning this, Trump could not hide his pride and posted: "I made the United States $45 billion in the past 8 months."

As a capital maestro who "manipulates the U.S. stock market by posting at a whim," Trump exerts an extraordinary influence on the rise and fall of U.S. stocks. Recently, he has started his performance again—providing a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce in exchange for equity. Odaily Planet Daily will provide a brief analysis in this article.

U.S. Government Acts Again, Investing $2 Billion in Quantum Computing Sector

On May 21, the Trump administration announced it would provide a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce, in exchange for partial equity. The specific allocation of funds is as follows:

  • $1 billion will be awarded to IBM (IBM) for the operation and development of its independent subsidiary, Anderon;
  • $375 million is allocated to chip manufacturer GlobalFoundries (GFS);
  • Listed companies such as D-Wave (QBTS), Infleqtion (INFQ), and Rigetti (RGTI) each receive $100 million;
  • Private companies such as Atom Computing, PsiQuantum, and Quantinuum (Honeywell-HON's independent subsidiary) each receive $100 million;
  • Startup Diraq is expected to receive $38 million.

According to official documents, this is part of the Trump administration's "active investor" industrial policy, with funding sourced from R&D appropriations under the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. The Department of Commerce emphasized that this is a "portfolio" strategy, covering two quantum wafer foundries and 7 quantum computing companies, targeting various quantum modalities such as neutral atoms, silicon spin, superconductors, photons, and trapped ions, addressing critical engineering bottlenecks like device reproducibility, error rates, optical complexity, and cryogenic system integration.

On the day the news was released, the U.S. stock quantum computing sector surged at the market open. Among them, D-Wave Quantum rose 16%, Rigetti Computing rose 14%, Infleqtion stock rose 25%, Quantum Computing rose 9%, and IonQ rose 3.1%.

It is worth mentioning that among these companies receiving funds, only GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) revealed the equity exchange ratio is approximately 1%. For other companies, whether public or private, the equity is a minority, non-controlling stake, with specific ratios not yet disclosed. Final ratios will be disclosed after formal agreements are signed and filed with the SEC.

Capital Operations Under the "America First" Strategy

Examining this "investment-for-equity" operation, it remains an action under the Trump administration's "America First" strategy.

Previously, U.S. government investments in Intel (INTC), MP Materials (MP) (the only fully integrated U.S. rare earth producer), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Lithium Americas (LAC), U.S. Steel, and others were also strategic moves to maintain the dominant position of the domestic semiconductor industry chain.

Especially the nearly $9 billion investment in Intel, the Trump administration explicitly stated that this move was to support domestic advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. and reduce dependence on TSMC (TSM). Therefore, the U.S. government's related holdings are passive, with no board seats, and it does not participate in the company's daily operations and management, largely following board votes on most matters.

However, the U.S. government's "equity investments" include not only financial support but also credit endorsement and multi-layered policy support (such as export licenses, tariff protection). Previously, after receiving U.S. government funding, Intel received strong support from U.S. Secretary of Commerce Lootnick, who met with Apple CEO Cook, Tesla CEO Musk, and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang multiple times over the past year, persuading them to cooperate with Intel successively. With Apple joining, Intel has now established relevant collaborations with all three companies mentioned.

Operational Shift Under the CHIPS and Science Act: From Grants to Equity Exchange

The $2 billion behind the investment in quantum computing companies stems from the CHIPS and Science Act, a landmark bipartisan bill introduced by the U.S. government in 2022, officially titled the "CHIPS and Science Act of 2022." The bill authorizes approximately $280 billion over 10 years to support semiconductor industry development and basic science and technology R&D. Its primary purpose is to revitalize U.S. semiconductor manufacturing, strengthen scientific research and innovation capabilities, and address competition from other nations in high-tech fields through massive investment.

However, unlike the fund grants or pure subsidy model during the Biden administration, the Trump administration's operational model is the aforementioned "active investor" model—switching to providing funding in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity. As of this May, the Act has attracted over $645 billion in private investment in semiconductor manufacturing, with over 140 projects, creating 525,000 new jobs.

It must be said that aside from personally manipulating and hyping stocks like Dell (DELL), Micron (MU), and Palantir (PLTR), Trump is also promoting U.S. stock market prosperity in the name of the U.S. government and its departments. No wonder he has repeatedly boasted, "The new highs in the stock market are mainly because of me."

Additionally, it is noteworthy that a previous investment announcement from the U.S. Department of Commerce stated, "The CHIPS Research and Development Office continues to solicit proposals from eligible applicants for research, prototyping, and commercial solutions in microelectronics technologies in the United States. Eligible applicants should submit applications via Announcement 2025-NIST-CHIPS-CRDO-01 on the www.grants.gov website." In other words, the U.S. government's "investment door" remains open. More information and funding announcements can be found in official sources.

Of course, the U.S. government invests in a wide range of company sectors, also involving critical minerals/rare earths, lithium batteries and other new energy sources, medical supplies, communication infrastructure, etc., such as Westinghouse Electric, Lithium Americas, Trilogy Metals, USA Rare Earth, Vulcan Elements, XLight, L3Harris Technologies, and others.

Furthermore, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Lootnick once revealed to the media that the current U.S. administration might take stakes in major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin (LMT).

In summary, the aforementioned numerous listed companies, key minerals/rare earths/battery material supply chains, nuclear energy/small modular reactors (SMRs) and advanced nuclear fuel, and other quantum computing targets may become directions for the Trump administration's continued investment in the second half of the year.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what significant action did the Trump administration recently take regarding quantum computing companies?

AThe Trump administration announced it would provide a total of $2 billion in funding to nine quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce in exchange for equity stakes.

QWhich specific company received the largest share of the $2 billion quantum computing funding mentioned in the article?

AIBM received the largest share, with $1 billion allocated to its independent subsidiary, Anderon.

QWhat is the source of the $2 billion funding for the quantum computing initiative as stated in the article?

AThe funding comes from the research and development appropriations of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act.

QHow did the stock prices of quantum computing companies react to the news of the government funding?

AOn the day of the announcement, the quantum computing sector's stock prices rose sharply at market open. Specifically, D-Wave Quantum rose 16%, Rigetti Computing rose 14%, Infleqtion stock rose 25%, Quantum Computing rose 9%, and IonQ rose 3.1%.

QHow does the Trump administration's approach to implementing the CHIPS and Science Act differ from the previous administration's, as described in the article?

AUnlike the Biden administration's model of providing grants or pure subsidies, the Trump administration's approach is an 'active investor' model, where funding is provided in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes.

Leituras Relacionadas

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbitHá 23m

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbitHá 23m

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbitHá 39m

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbitHá 39m

From ZEC's Surge to Vitalik's Support: Will the Privacy Narrative Resurface?

From ZEC's surge to Vitalik's endorsement, is privacy making a comeback? The recent rally in ZEC has refocused attention on the crypto privacy sector. This resurgence stems from a growing market realization: while blockchain transparency builds trust, full exposure of user balances, trading strategies, and risk positions can become a vulnerability, especially for large traders and institutions on platforms like Hyperliquid. The privacy landscape has evolved beyond classic anonymity coins like ZEC, XMR, and DASH. It now encompasses privacy infrastructure projects such as Railgun (bringing privacy to DeFi) and Aztec (a privacy-focused L2), as well as newer entrants like Genius Terminal, SilentSwap, and 0xBow that emphasize transaction privacy while attempting to balance compliance. Industry trends confirm privacy is becoming integrated, not a niche feature. Perp DEX Aster has introduced a "Shield Mode," and Vitalik has discussed the need for native privacy at the Ethereum protocol level, including proposals like EIP-8182 for standardized private transfers. In conclusion, this revival is more than a simple sector rotation. It reflects a critical reassessment of transparency's limits. As on-chain finance matures, the challenge is finding a sustainable balance between necessary transparency for trust and essential privacy for protecting assets and strategies, making privacy a potential cornerstone of next-generation infrastructure.

marsbitHá 49m

From ZEC's Surge to Vitalik's Support: Will the Privacy Narrative Resurface?

marsbitHá 49m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片