Trump Rejects Iran Peace Proposal — Bitcoin Breaks $82,000

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-05-12Última atualização em 2026-05-12

Resumo

Bitcoin has surged nearly 30% since the US-Iran war began on February 28, outpacing gold and the S&P 500 despite ongoing market turmoil. The rally faces potential catalysts this week, including a Senate vote on the hawkish Kevin Warsh for Fed chair and markup of the significant CLARITY Act, both viewed as bullish for Bitcoin. The conflict, triggered by a US airstrike killing Iran's Supreme Leader, continues with no near-term resolution. After former President Trump rejected Iran's peace proposal demanding reparations and asset unfreezing, Bitcoin initially dipped but quickly rebounded, breaking above $82,000 and liquidating over $60 million in shorts. With Israeli PM Netanyahu insisting on dismantling Iran's uranium sites, hopes for a quick ceasefire have faded, underscoring Bitcoin's divergent performance amid deepening geopolitical strain and rising oil prices.

Bitcoin has now climbed nearly 30% since the US-Iran war began on February 28 — a run that has outpaced both gold and the S&P 500 even as the conflict continues to shake global markets.

A Week Of Potential Catalysts

Two events in the US Senate this week could add more fuel to that rally, according to 10x Research CEO Markus Thielen.

The first is a Monday vote on Kevin Warsh’s nomination as Federal Reserve chair. The second is a Thursday markup session for the CLARITY Act in the Senate Banking Committee.

Thielen described the crypto legislation as the most significant of its kind in years, one that could bring long-awaited regulatory certainty to digital assets.

As for Warsh — widely seen as more hawkish on inflation than current Fed chair Jerome Powell — Thielen said his confirmation would clear away uncertainty rather than create it. Both events, he said, lean bullish for Bitcoin.

The backdrop to all this is a conflict that shows no sign of ending soon. The US-Iran war, which started after a US airstrike killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has rattled financial markets for the past 10 weeks.

Source: Truth Social

One of the central flashpoints is the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of global oil trade passes.

Oil climbed another 4.5% to $98.68 per barrel after Trump’s latest statement, adding pressure to an already strained economic picture.

Bitcoin’s Swing After Trump’s Post

On Sunday, Trump took to Truth Social to reject Iran’s counteroffer to a peace deal. Iran had been pushing for war reparations and the unfreezing of blocked financial assets — conditions Trump flatly dismissed.

BTCUSD now trading at $81,013. Chart: TradingView

Bitcoin initially slid on the news, dropping from $81,400 to $80,500 within 45 minutes of the post. But it didn’t stay down. Within three hours, the price had swung back above $82,000, breaking $81,000 on the way up and settling near $82,350.

Data shows that move wiped out over $60 million in short positions over a four-hour window.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu added that the war won’t conclude until Iran’s uranium sites are fully dismantled, further dimming prospects of a near-term resolution.

Hopes Fade For Early End To The Conflict

Peace talks had been expected to make progress by Wednesday. Trump’s rejection of Iran’s proposal ended that possibility for now.

The conflict, which began 10 weeks ago, has shown Bitcoin behaving differently from traditional assets — rising even as geopolitical tension deepens, oil surges, and ceasefire talks collapse.

Featured image from The Leaflet, chart from TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat two U.S. Senate events does Markus Thielen identify as potential catalysts for Bitcoin this week?

AThe two events are a Monday vote on Kevin Warsh's nomination as Federal Reserve chair and a Thursday markup session for the CLARITY Act in the Senate Banking Committee.

QHow did Bitcoin's price react in the immediate aftermath of Donald Trump's post rejecting Iran's peace proposal?

ABitcoin's price initially dropped from $81,400 to $80,500 within 45 minutes. However, it then recovered, swinging back above $82,000 within three hours and settling near $82,350.

QAccording to the article, what is the Strait of Hormuz and why is it significant in the current conflict?

AThe Strait of Hormuz is a geographic chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of global oil trade passes. It is a central flashpoint in the US-Iran conflict, and disruptions there impact global oil prices and markets.

QWhat condition did Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu set for the conclusion of the war?

ABenjamin Netanyahu stated that the war will not conclude until Iran's uranium sites are fully dismantled.

QHow has Bitcoin's performance since the war began compared to gold and the S&P 500?

ABitcoin has climbed nearly 30% since the war began, a run that has outpaced the performance of both gold and the S&P 500 during the same period.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手Há 6m

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手Há 6m

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbitHá 1h

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbitHá 1h

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

In the week of May 15-19, 2026, U.S. long-term Treasury yields surged to multi-year highs, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.2%, a level unseen since 2007, and the 10-year yield climbing to 4.687%. Equity markets declined in response. Four primary factors are driving the rise in yields. First, stubborn inflation persists, with April wholesale prices rising 6% year-over-year, fueling expectations of potential future Fed rate hikes instead of cuts. Second, newly confirmed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh inherits a complex inflation battle, with markets closely awaiting his first FOMC meeting. Third, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health, marked by large deficits and rising debt servicing costs, is eroding the traditional "safe-haven" premium for Treasuries. Fourth, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts are projected to add trillions to the national debt, contributing to Moody's recent credit rating downgrade. Rising yields pressure stocks through several channels: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of future earnings (especially for growth stocks); rising risk-free rates compress equity risk premiums, making bonds relatively more attractive; higher borrowing costs impact consumers and corporations; and a stronger dollar affects multinational earnings. For investors, the environment favors value and financial stocks over long-duration growth stocks. Bond investors find attractive yields in short to intermediate maturities, while income investors see the best fixed-income opportunities in over a decade. Key developments to watch include Chair Warsh's first FOMC meeting, upcoming inflation data, Treasury auction demand, and whether the 30-year yield approaches 6%, a level that could trigger a more sustained equity valuation reset. The bond market's message is clear: the era of cheap government borrowing is over, posing a central challenge for markets in late 2026.

marsbitHá 1h

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

marsbitHá 1h

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

The article "Is Strategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Decoding 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment" analyzes why companies might sell their bitcoin holdings, arguing it's not necessarily negative. It begins by noting the market's surprise at Strategy's potential sale, contrasting its previous "never sell" stance. The core argument is that corporate decisions prioritize shareholder value, and selling bitcoin can be a rational strategic choice. The article outlines five key financial reasons for such sales: 1. **Increase Bitcoin Holdings Per Share:** Companies can use proceeds from bitcoin sales to repurchase shares when the stock price is undervalued relative to its bitcoin assets. This reduces the outstanding share count, potentially increasing the bitcoin amount backing each remaining share. 2. **Optimize Capital Structure & Reduce Financing Costs:** Building cash reserves through bitcoin sales can improve credit ratings (as favored by agencies like S&P), leading to lower future borrowing costs. Repaying debt with sale proceeds also reduces financial leverage. 3. **Legitimate Tax Planning:** In the absence of wash-sale rules for bitcoin in the US, companies can sell to realize capital losses, then repurchase, lowering the tax basis of their holdings and creating tax offsets. 4. **Counter Negative Market Narratives:** A controlled, non-disruptive sale could demonstrate market resilience and disprove fears that corporate selling would crash the market, thereby normalizing bitcoin as a corporate treasury asset. 5. **Repurchase Preferred Stock at a Discount:** If a company's preferred stock trades significantly below its face value, using bitcoin sale proceeds to repurchase it can retire expensive liabilities at a profit, saving on future dividend payments. The conclusion emphasizes that bitcoin's monetary properties offer flexibility. Strategic sales can protect corporate and shareholder interests, making asset utilization more important than rigid "hold" mandates.

marsbitHá 1h

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片