Trump Memecoin Dangles Mar-A-Lago Access As Token Price Spikes 34%

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-13Última atualização em 2026-03-13

Resumo

The TRUMP memecoin, which had plummeted 96% from its January 2025 peak to an all-time low of $2.73, surged 34% to $3.82 after an announcement that top holders could gain access to a luncheon with former President Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago on April 25. Eligibility is determined by time-weighted token balances held between March 12 and April 10, with the top 297 holders invited, subject to a background check. While the event's website lists Trump as the keynote speaker, the White House has not confirmed his attendance, noting a scheduling conflict with the White House Correspondents' Dinner. This marks the second such event, following a similar gathering at a Trump golf club last May, which drew protests and criticism over allegations that the president is monetizing access to his office. Prominent figures like Justin Sun and Kain Warwick attended the previous event.

Protesters once shouted “Shame!” at guests leaving the first one. Now there’s a second.

A Token In Freefall

The TRUMP memecoin had just touched the lowest price in its history — down 96% from the $73 peak it hit in January 2025 — when its backers dropped an announcement that sent the price ticking back up.

Top holders would get a shot at lunch with US President Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. The date: April 25. The venue: his Florida estate. The guest list: capped at 297 people, with the top 29 earmarked for a private reception.

The token climbed to $3.07 on the news, pulling back up from an all-time low of $2.73 it had hit just hours earlier. As of Thursday it sat at $3.82, up 34% on the day. That’s still a steep drop from where it started.

Who Gets In — And How

Eligibility isn’t based on a single snapshot. Reports say the team behind the token will rank holders by time-weighted balances accumulated between March 12 and April 10.

In plain terms: buy more, hold longer, move up the leaderboard. All attendees must also pass a background check before they’re allowed in.

Trump is listed as the keynote speaker on the event’s official website. But a White House official told Politico the appearance hasn’t been locked into the president’s schedule — and that April 25 is the same day Trump said he’d attend the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

The luncheon would mark the second time TRUMP token holders have been offered access to the president in exchange for holding the coin.

The first gathering took place at a Trump golf club last May. That event drew a mix of crypto investors and outside scrutiny.

US senators and former White House staffers protested on the grounds. According to Bloomberg, demonstrators shouted at guests as they arrived.

TRUMPUSDT now trading at $3.79. Chart: TradingView

Big Money, Big Names

The May event also drew attention for who showed up. Tron founder Justin Sun held enough of the token to rank as the largest holder in attendance, a position that reportedly came with a watch presented during a ceremony.

Infinex founder Kain Warwick also attended after acquiring enough tokens to crack the top 25 on the leaderboard.

Critics Call It Access For Sale

The events have drawn a consistent line of criticism: that the president is using his office to benefit financially. Each time a new gala is announced, those concerns resurface.

The structure of the program — where buying and holding a coin tied to the sitting president directly translates into face time with him — has no real precedent in American politics.

Reports indicate the White House has not confirmed whether Trump will actually appear at the April event. For now, the leaderboard is open, the countdown is running, and the token is off its floor.

Featured image from Davidoff Studios/Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the incentive announced that caused the TRUMP memecoin price to increase by 34%?

AThe announcement that top holders of the TRUMP memecoin would have a chance to attend a luncheon with former President Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago on April 25.

QHow is eligibility for the Mar-a-Lago event determined for TRUMP token holders?

AEligibility is based on a leaderboard that ranks holders by their time-weighted token balances accumulated between March 12 and April 10. Buying more tokens and holding them longer moves a holder up the leaderboard.

QWhat major conflict exists regarding President Trump's schedule on April 25th?

AThe event's website lists Trump as the keynote speaker for the luncheon on April 25, but a White House official stated that this appearance is not yet on the president's schedule and that he is expected to attend the White House Correspondents' Dinner on the same day.

QWhat is the primary criticism leveled against these events where token holders meet the president?

ACritics argue that the president is using his office for financial benefit, as buying and holding a coin tied to him directly translates into access and face time with him, which has no real precedent in American politics.

QWhich prominent figures from the crypto industry attended the previous event held at a Trump golf club?

ATron founder Justin Sun, who was the largest token holder in attendance, and Infinex founder Kain Warwick, who acquired enough tokens to be in the top 25 on the leaderboard.

Leituras Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHá 13m

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHá 13m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHá 29m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHá 29m

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinistHá 1h

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinistHá 1h

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinistHá 2h

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinistHá 2h

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinistHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow