Traditional Gambling Giants Enter Prediction Markets, Aiming to Outmaneuver Wall Street

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-02-12Última atualização em 2026-02-12

Resumo

Traditional sports betting giants like DraftKings, Fanatics, and FanDuel are entering the prediction markets, leveraging their expertise in odds-setting and risk management to compete against Wall Street firms like Susquehanna and Jump Trading. These betting companies argue that their experience in pricing complex, real-time sports outcomes—such as injuries or weather changes—gives them an edge. However, Wall Street firms are responding by hiring sports specialists and applying their deep financial capital and algorithmic trading experience. As both sides converge—betting firms adopting financial strategies and trading firms gaining sports knowledge—the market is becoming increasingly competitive. This rivalry may narrow profit margins due to tighter spreads but is expected to improve overall market liquidity and user experience.

This article is from: Sportico

Compiled by | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina); Translator | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

As prediction markets explode, two groups are closely watching—one from Wall Street and the other from Morton Street (the headquarters of gaming company Fanatics). On one side are professional financial trading firms, and on the other are traditional gambling service providers. Both believe they have what it takes to become top predators.

Gambling Companies Enter Market Making

Three traditional sports betting service providers—DraftKings, Fanatics, and FanDuel—have all ventured into prediction markets to counter the threat this emerging trend poses to their core businesses. After experiencing a shift in investor sentiment, these companies are accelerating their efforts and view their extensive experience in the gambling industry as a potential competitive advantage.

DraftKings, Fanatics, and FanDuel have all started or plan to offer "odds" through affiliated market makers on their prediction market platforms. This is similar to their traditional sports betting operations, but with a key difference: in prediction markets, they must compete with third parties who can also place orders.

Based on Sportico's discussions with executives and industry analysts, there is no consensus yet that gambling companies directly engaging in market making can achieve higher returns than professional financial trading firms. However, gambling companies are confident in the profit potential of market making.

Peter Jackson, CEO of FanDuel’s parent company Flutter Entertainment, stated during the Q3 earnings call in November: "The core capability required for market makers is the ability to accurately price complex and interconnected outcomes. This is exactly what our core business does every day."

Fanatics already has an active affiliated market maker called Morton St. Market Maker LLC—named after the street in New York City where its parent company is located, within walking distance of some Wall Street competitors. Morton St. Market Maker provides odds for both buying and selling contracts on Crypto.com, the underlying prediction market platform integrated by Fanatics.

Meanwhile, DraftKings and FanDuel have both hinted at having affiliated market-making teams that trade against their clients, though it is unclear whether DraftKings or FanDuel has formally established such entities.

To ensure all users can quickly enter and exit positions at near-fair prices, market makers typically need to provide liquidity on both the "YES" and "NO" sides during specific periods. Their profits come from the small spreads between "buy now" and "sell now" quotes. For example, if a user buys a contract for the New York Mets to win at $0.50, and the market maker previously acquired the contract via a limit order at $0.47, the market maker earns $0.03.

Wall Street’s Counter-Encirclement

On the other side of the gambling companies are professional trading institutions from Wall Street.

Although Wall Street firms like Susquehanna International Group have extensive experience in financial derivatives market making, some industry insiders interviewed by Sportico noted that Wall Street is indeed less adept at setting odds for sports events compared to traditional gambling companies.

Alfonso Straffon, who has worked in market making for both Wall Street junk bonds and sports betting, said: "I would caution Wall Street firms not to underestimate their opponents. The sports betting ecosystem has been around for a long time."

Sports events present more complex risk management challenges for market makers, especially during games, where any development—such as injuries, weather changes, or coaching decisions—can drastically alter the true value of bets. "Parlays" introduce additional risks, and a single mistake can lead to significant losses. If exchanges leverage trading, this risk will be further amplified.

Advanced data models and the ability to access information before the public—these are the advantages of traditional gambling companies—are crucial for mitigating risks.

However, this does not mean gambling companies are guaranteed to win in prediction markets. Another sports betting company founder believes that, with deeper capital and experience adapting to different financial markets, Wall Street will ultimately achieve higher returns.

Wall Street firms like Susquehanna and Jump Trading, which lack long-term sports experience, are racing to hire market-making specialists with sports expertise. Prediction markets like Crypto.com and Polymarket have also posted related job openings for their affiliated trading departments in recent months. Rothera, owned by Robinhood, mentioned an active affiliated market maker in its rulebook (sources suggest it might be Susquehanna). According to a Bloomberg report this week, Jump Trading is simultaneously investing in Kalshi and Polymarket.

Sportico previously reported details about Kalshi Trading (Kalshi’s affiliated market-making arm), which is also working to弥补 its lack of sports experience. Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara stated on X that Kalshi Trading was not profitable in sports and that sports accounted for "less than 6% of its market-making volume" in November.

Competitive Advantages May Gradually Converge

Market making is not a high-margin business. Having multiple companies compete on pricing in the same prediction market naturally compresses profitable spreads. In other words, the more market makers there are in a prediction market, the less profit can be made per bet.

However, although prediction markets with affiliated market makers might prefer to limit the number of market makers,实际操作中情况远非如此简单。Without institutional capital support, overall market liquidity could suffer. Unless affiliated market makers inject significant capital (and assume corresponding risks) to fill the gap, user experience will be directly affected.

This means gambling companies will inevitably compete with financial institutions on the same field, vying for order flow from retail bettors.

Ultimately, as Wall Street institutions hire professionals with sports expertise (and vice versa), the competitive advantages of both sides may gradually converge. But for now, at least, gambling companies entering prediction markets are confident in their chances of success.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two main groups competing in the prediction market space according to the article?

AThe two main groups are professional financial trading firms from Wall Street and traditional sports betting service providers from Morton Street (like Fanatics, DraftKings, and FanDuel).

QWhat is the core competency that Peter Jackson, CEO of Flutter Entertainment (FanDuel's parent), believes gives betting companies an advantage in market making?

AHe believes their core competency is the ability to accurately price complex and interconnected outcomes, which is what their core business does every day.

QWhat is the name of the affiliated market maker for Fanatics, and on which platform does it provide odds?

AThe affiliated market maker is named Morton St. Market Maker LLC, and it provides odds on the Crypto.com prediction market platform.

QWhat two specific advantages do traditional betting companies have over Wall Street firms in managing the risks of sports event prediction markets?

ATheir advantages are sophisticated data models and the ability to obtain information before the general public, both of which are crucial for risk management.

QWhat is the expected long-term outcome regarding the competitive advantages of Wall Street firms and betting companies in the prediction market space?

AThe article suggests that their competitive advantages will likely converge over time as Wall Street firms hire talent with sports expertise and betting companies potentially adopt strategies from finance.

Leituras Relacionadas

OCC report finds debanking efforts tied to crypto activities

A report from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) identifies digital asset activities as one of the industries leading banks to restrict financial services, a practice known as debanking. The report, mandated by a 2025 executive order from former President Donald Trump, reviewed nine major banks and found they had policies limiting services for sectors including crypto, oil and gas, tobacco, and firearms. The OCC stated banks often cited financial crime risks as a reason for restricting digital asset firms, such as issuers and exchanges, but the report lacked specific examples of such debanking. It also highlighted that decisions to debank industries like coal were driven by reputational concerns rather than financial risk. The findings follow industry allegations of a coordinated "Operation Chokepoint 2.0" effort to cut off crypto firms from banking services.

cointelegraphHá 8m

OCC report finds debanking efforts tied to crypto activities

cointelegraphHá 8m

Standard Chartered pushes $2T stablecoin forecast to 2030 as transaction volumes grow

Standard Chartered now projects the stablecoin market will reach a $2 trillion market capitalization by 2030, a delay of two years from its earlier forecast. This revision follows a market plateau at around $309 billion this year. The bank's research highlights that transaction volumes continue to grow despite the stalled overall value, indicating existing stablecoins are circulating more frequently as their use cases diversify. Analyst Geoffrey Kendrick outlines four distinct market segments: Tether's USDT leads in emerging-market savings, Circle's USDC is ahead in developed-market payments and AI agent transactions, while both USDC and Ethena's USDe are strong in crypto trading. Intense competition is expected in developed-market payments from new challengers, with the division of reserve yields being a key factor for gaining market share. The forecast comes alongside U.S. regulatory developments following the 2025 GENIUS Act, including proposed rules on issuance and reserve requirements, and potential accounting changes that could encourage broader business adoption for payments and settlements.

cointelegraphHá 36m

Standard Chartered pushes $2T stablecoin forecast to 2030 as transaction volumes grow

cointelegraphHá 36m

Fed Governor Bowman: No Urgent Need to Raise Interest Rates, Can Watch Economic Trends

Federal Reserve Governor and Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman stated that the Federal Reserve is in no immediate hurry to raise interest rates further. Speaking at the International Institute of Finance annual membership summit in Bangkok on October 14, Bowman emphasized the need to take time to assess the impact of the September rate hike and observe how economic and financial conditions evolve before making further policy decisions. While acknowledging inflation remains above target, she stressed a comprehensive, data-dependent approach. Her comments align with recent cautious tones from several Fed officials but highlight an ongoing internal debate. Other officials, including New York Fed President John Williams and Boston Fed President Susan Collins, have indicated openness to one more rate hike this year to combat persistent inflation. Market expectations now lean toward the Fed holding steady at its upcoming meeting, with future policy moves heavily dependent on incoming inflation data, particularly the upcoming September CPI report. Beyond monetary policy, Bowman addressed financial regulation. She critiqued some post-2008 crisis rules for pushing activity outside the formal banking system and called for a "comprehensive reorganization" of the Fed's internal supervisory structure following the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. On technology, she expressed concern about cybersecurity risks from advanced AI models and the capital demands of data center expansion, while also acknowledging the importance of allowing banks to innovate and exploring AI's potential applications in areas like fraud detection.

marsbitHá 39m

Fed Governor Bowman: No Urgent Need to Raise Interest Rates, Can Watch Economic Trends

marsbitHá 39m

Rethinking Neobanks

"Rethinking Neobanks" discusses how blockchain and AI are fundamentally reshaping the concept of neobanks. It highlights how platforms like Stripe are modularizing banking functions into APIs, enabling anyone to assemble banking services using components like stablecoins for global accounts, thereby drastically lowering the entry barrier. The article introduces a three-layer framework: the **bottom layer** controls the balance sheet (licenses, deposits, stablecoin issuance); the **middle layer** manages the global account and payment orchestration; and the **top layer** focuses on customer acquisition and embedding finance into specific user scenarios or products. It argues that while assembling a neobank is easier, the core challenge shifts to sustainable profitability and risk management. Companies should start by renting capabilities, then reclaim control over profit-critical areas like low-cost funding or underwriting as they scale. The emergence of AI agents adds a new competitive dimension: control over user authorization and the translation of intent into secure, executable financial transactions. Ultimately, "neobank" may cease to describe a specific industry. Instead, banking is becoming a ubiquitous capability that can be embedded into any product with a user base.

marsbitHá 44m

The Scene From 1999 Is Repeating Itself

The article draws a stark parallel between the current U.S. stock market and the period leading up to the 2000 dot-com crash. While the S&P 500 hovers near record highs, this strength is deceptive. Beneath the surface, 60% of its components are already in a technical bear market. The index is being propped up almost entirely by the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants, reminiscent of the narrow leadership seen in 1999. Prominent figures like Paul Tudor Jones of Tudor Investment are issuing strong warnings, comparing the present market structure to 1999 and predicting 2027 could be the worst year for stocks since 2002, citing massive upcoming equity supply from IPOs (e.g., Anthropic, OpenAI) and lock-up expirations. Analysts from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and BTIG echo concerns about extreme concentration and deteriorating market breadth. Key risks identified include an over-reliance on a few AI-related stocks for index returns and earnings growth, signs of peaking profit cycles, and a potential shift in market leadership from semiconductors to software. The upcoming earnings season for cloud giants, particularly their capital expenditure guidance, is seen as a critical near-term catalyst. Furthermore, rising bond yields (10-year Treasury above 5%) and soaring corporate debt issuance costs add to the pressure. The summary concludes by noting a profound disconnect: despite a 16-fold total return in the S&P 500 since 2009, consumer sentiment is at near-record lows, highlighting the unequal distribution of gains and rising cost-of-living pressures—a social tension that mirrors the speculative excesses of the late 1990s.

marsbitHá 46m