Traders Lost Nearly $500 Million Due to Crypto Market Crash. What Happened

RBK-cryptoPublicado em 2026-01-08Última atualização em 2026-01-08

Resumo

On January 8th, the cryptocurrency market experienced a sharp decline, with Bitcoin (BTC) momentarily dropping below $90,000, erasing all its gains from the beginning of the week. Ethereum (ETH) also fell, dropping over 5% to below $3,100. Although prices slightly recovered later, the total market capitalization fell by approximately 4% to $3.1 trillion. This volatility led to the liquidation of over $460 million in leveraged trades, affecting more than 127,000 traders. The vast majority of these losses, $415 million, were from long positions betting on price increases, primarily in Bitcoin and Ethereum. Market sentiment, as measured by the Fear and Greed Index, remained in the "fear" zone at 28 out of 100, indicating a tendency among investors toward panic selling. Furthermore, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a significant net capital outflow of nearly $486 million on January 7th, marking the second consecutive session of outflows. Ethereum ETFs also saw outflows, ending a three-session streak of positive inflows with a $98 million net outflow. Despite the recent drop, Bitcoin's price remains up more than 3% since the start of the year.

"RBC-Crypto" does not provide investment advice, the material is published for informational purposes only. Cryptocurrency is a volatile asset that can lead to financial losses.

On the morning of January 8, the price of Bitcoin (BTC) momentarily dropped below $90,000, wiping out all gains from the beginning of the week. From the peak of the previous day, quotes lost more than 3.5%. Ethereum (ETH) lost more than 5% from its January 7 peak—its price momentarily fell below $3,100.

By 11:20 Moscow time, Bitcoin quotes had slightly recovered and were around $90,500. ETH is trading at the level of $3,150. The total capitalization of the crypto market lost approximately 4% over the past 24 hours, standing at $3.1 trillion.

Since the beginning of the year, the price of BTC still shows growth of more than 3%, and the local peak was reached on January 5 at the mark of $94,800.

Amid volatility in the crypto market over the past 24 hours, crypto exchanges liquidated leveraged trades of more than 127,000 traders for a total of about $460 million, according to Coinglass data. The majority of the losses—$415 million—were incurred by those betting on the rise of cryptocurrencies (long positions, longs). Most of the losses occurred in the Bitcoin and Ethereum markets.

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index has been in the "fear" zone since mid-December—according to data as of January 8, it is holding at 28 points out of 100. The movement of the indicator suggests that market participants are leaning towards panic selling of cryptocurrencies.

At the end of the trading session on January 7, spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the US recorded a net capital outflow of nearly $486 million, according to information from SoSoValue. This is the second consecutive trading session with a net capital outflow from Bitcoin funds. Ethereum-based ETFs broke a series of three consecutive trading sessions with a positive capital inflow indicator—on January 7, the aggregate outflow amounted to $98 million.

What will happen to the regulation of the cryptocurrency market in Russia in 2026

Bitcoin turned 17 years old

Bitcoin as "digital gold": what an investor should know

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total amount of money liquidated from traders in the crypto market crash, and what was the primary cause of these liquidations?

AApproximately $460 million was liquidated from over 127,000 traders. The primary cause was a sharp market drop, with Bitcoin falling below $90k and Ethereum below $3.1k, which triggered the liquidation of leveraged positions.

QHow did the prices of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) change during the market drop on January 8th?

ABitcoin's price momentarily dropped below $90,000, losing over 3.5% from its peak the previous day. Ethereum's price fell below $3,100, losing more than 5% from its peak on January 7th.

QWhat does the 'Fear and Greed Index' value of 28 indicate about the sentiment in the cryptocurrency market?

AA value of 28 indicates that the market is in a state of 'Fear,' suggesting that market participants are leaning towards panic selling of cryptocurrencies.

QWhat was the net capital flow for US spot Bitcoin ETFs on January 7th, and how did it compare to the previous session?

AUS spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net capital outflow of nearly $486 million on January 7th. This was the second consecutive trading session with a net capital outflow for Bitcoin funds.

QDespite the recent drop, what is Bitcoin's overall performance since the beginning of the year mentioned in the article?

ASince the beginning of the year, Bitcoin's price is still showing growth of more than 3%, with a local peak reached on January 5th at $94,800.

Leituras Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHá 18m

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHá 18m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHá 33m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHá 33m

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinistHá 1h

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinistHá 1h

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinistHá 2h

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinistHá 2h

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinistHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow