Traders Lost Nearly $500 Million Due to Crypto Market Crash. What Happened

RBK-cryptoPublicado em 2026-01-08Última atualização em 2026-01-08

Resumo

On January 8th, the cryptocurrency market experienced a sharp decline, with Bitcoin (BTC) momentarily dropping below $90,000, erasing all its gains from the beginning of the week. Ethereum (ETH) also fell, dropping over 5% to below $3,100. Although prices slightly recovered later, the total market capitalization fell by approximately 4% to $3.1 trillion. This volatility led to the liquidation of over $460 million in leveraged trades, affecting more than 127,000 traders. The vast majority of these losses, $415 million, were from long positions betting on price increases, primarily in Bitcoin and Ethereum. Market sentiment, as measured by the Fear and Greed Index, remained in the "fear" zone at 28 out of 100, indicating a tendency among investors toward panic selling. Furthermore, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a significant net capital outflow of nearly $486 million on January 7th, marking the second consecutive session of outflows. Ethereum ETFs also saw outflows, ending a three-session streak of positive inflows with a $98 million net outflow. Despite the recent drop, Bitcoin's price remains up more than 3% since the start of the year.

"RBC-Crypto" does not provide investment advice, the material is published for informational purposes only. Cryptocurrency is a volatile asset that can lead to financial losses.

On the morning of January 8, the price of Bitcoin (BTC) momentarily dropped below $90,000, wiping out all gains from the beginning of the week. From the peak of the previous day, quotes lost more than 3.5%. Ethereum (ETH) lost more than 5% from its January 7 peak—its price momentarily fell below $3,100.

By 11:20 Moscow time, Bitcoin quotes had slightly recovered and were around $90,500. ETH is trading at the level of $3,150. The total capitalization of the crypto market lost approximately 4% over the past 24 hours, standing at $3.1 trillion.

Since the beginning of the year, the price of BTC still shows growth of more than 3%, and the local peak was reached on January 5 at the mark of $94,800.

Amid volatility in the crypto market over the past 24 hours, crypto exchanges liquidated leveraged trades of more than 127,000 traders for a total of about $460 million, according to Coinglass data. The majority of the losses—$415 million—were incurred by those betting on the rise of cryptocurrencies (long positions, longs). Most of the losses occurred in the Bitcoin and Ethereum markets.

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index has been in the "fear" zone since mid-December—according to data as of January 8, it is holding at 28 points out of 100. The movement of the indicator suggests that market participants are leaning towards panic selling of cryptocurrencies.

At the end of the trading session on January 7, spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the US recorded a net capital outflow of nearly $486 million, according to information from SoSoValue. This is the second consecutive trading session with a net capital outflow from Bitcoin funds. Ethereum-based ETFs broke a series of three consecutive trading sessions with a positive capital inflow indicator—on January 7, the aggregate outflow amounted to $98 million.

What will happen to the regulation of the cryptocurrency market in Russia in 2026

Bitcoin turned 17 years old

Bitcoin as "digital gold": what an investor should know

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total amount of money liquidated from traders in the crypto market crash, and what was the primary cause of these liquidations?

AApproximately $460 million was liquidated from over 127,000 traders. The primary cause was a sharp market drop, with Bitcoin falling below $90k and Ethereum below $3.1k, which triggered the liquidation of leveraged positions.

QHow did the prices of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) change during the market drop on January 8th?

ABitcoin's price momentarily dropped below $90,000, losing over 3.5% from its peak the previous day. Ethereum's price fell below $3,100, losing more than 5% from its peak on January 7th.

QWhat does the 'Fear and Greed Index' value of 28 indicate about the sentiment in the cryptocurrency market?

AA value of 28 indicates that the market is in a state of 'Fear,' suggesting that market participants are leaning towards panic selling of cryptocurrencies.

QWhat was the net capital flow for US spot Bitcoin ETFs on January 7th, and how did it compare to the previous session?

AUS spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net capital outflow of nearly $486 million on January 7th. This was the second consecutive trading session with a net capital outflow for Bitcoin funds.

QDespite the recent drop, what is Bitcoin's overall performance since the beginning of the year mentioned in the article?

ASince the beginning of the year, Bitcoin's price is still showing growth of more than 3%, with a local peak reached on January 5th at $94,800.

Leituras Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 2m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 2m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 20m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 20m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHá 48m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHá 48m

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News, July 21 – Pump.fun has launched its new "BOOST" mode as the standard launch mechanism for new tokens. The core of BOOST is to address the issue of "dead liquidity." Historically, when a token migrates from its bonding curve to a liquidity pool, roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked and unusable, a problem the platform estimates costs over $100 million annually. The new mechanism redirects this 20% of funds, which would have been locked, to instead be used for a 5-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) buyback of the token immediately after migration. The purchased tokens are then permanently burned. For example, this means reserving 17.6 SOL for SOL pairs or about $2516 for USDC pairs at migration. This creates a short-term buying pressure and reduces the token's supply. The goal is to improve the immediate post-launch performance of memecoins, potentially increasing trader retention and transaction volume on the platform. However, critics warn this could lower the bar for token launches, encouraging low-quality projects, and that the brief 5-minute buy pressure might lead to sharper price crashes once it ends if followed by large sell-offs.

Foresight NewsHá 57m

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight NewsHá 57m

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

India's largest asset manager, SBI Funds Management, successfully listed on July 21 with a nearly $10 billion IPO, attracting approximately 42 times subscription. However, the first-day closing price rose only about 6.3%, falling short of the 16% premium anticipated in the grey market. This signals robust demand for core Indian financial assets but also disciplined pricing, indicating the IPO market is selectively open for strong brands with clear growth narratives. The low reported underwriting fees, which led some global banks to reduce participation, highlight a shift in pricing power towards powerful issuers like SBI. Its strong brand, banking parent, and stable cash flows reduced reliance on traditional investment banking sales channels, with local brokers playing a larger role. This fee dynamic may not be replicable for weaker issuers. SBI's performance is seen as a key test for India's IPO pipeline, including potential future large listings like Reliance Jio and NSE. Its success with tempered gains sets a new price anchor: high-quality assets can launch, but excessive valuation premiums are constrained. The true measure of a sustained market reopening will be whether subsequent major offerings can proceed smoothly at reasonable valuations.

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot