Tim Scott Signals Breakthrough on Stablecoin Yield Dispute

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-18Última atualização em 2026-03-18

Resumo

U.S. Senator Tim Scott has indicated that a breakthrough may be imminent in the dispute over stablecoin yield provisions within the Senate's crypto market structure bill, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. He expects to receive the first compromise proposal this week. The bill's progress had stalled due to disagreements on a clause that would ban third parties from offering yields on stablecoins. Traditional bankers argue such yields create a loophole diverting deposits from banks, while crypto advocates view the restriction as anti-competitive. Recent closed-door meetings between banks and crypto lobbyists have aimed to find a middle ground, though no official updates to the legislative calendar have been made.

Tim Scott, a U.S. senator, has revealed that this week banks and crypto lobbyists may compromise regarding stablecoin yield payments. In the current scenario, the Senate’s crypto market structure bill progress is stalled.

Scott attended a crypto lobby event in Washington chaired by the Senate Banking Committee, in which he said that he anticipates having the first proposal in his hands to take a look at. He further added that if that really happens before the end of this week, and I think that it will. I think we are going to be in much better shape.

The bill about which he is talking is the Senate’s crypto market structure legislation, officially known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which was rolled out to define how regulators will look after digital assets and describe the roles of various agencies.

Although progress revolving the legislation came to a standstill after disagreements arose over a provision that would prohibit third parties from providing stablecoin yield payments. Bankers claim that such yield offerings make a loophole that could take deposits away from traditional banks.

The crypto proponents say the limitation is anti-competitive and restricts user incentives. The bill is of concern to the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The Rigorous Meetings

Senate Banking, which looks after the SEC, indefinitely delayed a markup of the bill in January. Afterward, the Senate Agriculture Committee, which looks after the CFTC, progressed its version to the Senate floor.

In the last weeks, bankers and crypto lobbyists have met in various closed-door meetings to negotiate a middle ground, but the Senate Banking Committee has not yet set any official updates to the legislative calendar.

In the latest comments, House Financial Services Committee chair French Hill mentioned the CLARITY Act can help address some of the unresolved issues associated with stablecoin regulation and wider market structure concerns.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

OKX has Launched a Security-Packed Agentic Wallet

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main breakthrough that Senator Tim Scott signaled regarding stablecoin regulation?

ASenator Tim Scott signaled that banks and crypto lobbyists may compromise on the dispute over stablecoin yield payments, potentially leading to a proposal being reviewed by the end of the week.

QWhich specific bill is being discussed in relation to crypto market structure and stablecoin yields?

AThe bill being discussed is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which aims to define regulatory oversight of digital assets and assign roles to various agencies.

QWhy did progress on the crypto market structure bill stall in the Senate?

AProgress stalled due to disagreements over a provision that would prohibit third parties from providing stablecoin yield payments, with bankers arguing it creates a loophole that could divert deposits from traditional banks.

QWhat are the opposing views between bankers and crypto proponents on stablecoin yield payments?

ABankers claim stablecoin yield offerings create a loophole that could take deposits away from traditional banks, while crypto proponents argue the limitation is anti-competitive and restricts user incentives.

QWhich congressional committees are involved in overseeing the crypto market structure legislation?

AThe Senate Banking Committee (overseeing the SEC) and the Senate Agriculture Committee (overseeing the CFTC) are involved, with the House Financial Services Committee also commenting on the CLARITY Act's potential to address regulatory issues.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 22m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 22m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHá 30m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHá 30m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHá 34m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHá 34m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 41m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 41m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 50m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think