Tim Scott Signals Breakthrough on Stablecoin Yield Dispute

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-18Última atualização em 2026-03-18

Resumo

U.S. Senator Tim Scott has indicated that a breakthrough may be imminent in the dispute over stablecoin yield provisions within the Senate's crypto market structure bill, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. He expects to receive the first compromise proposal this week. The bill's progress had stalled due to disagreements on a clause that would ban third parties from offering yields on stablecoins. Traditional bankers argue such yields create a loophole diverting deposits from banks, while crypto advocates view the restriction as anti-competitive. Recent closed-door meetings between banks and crypto lobbyists have aimed to find a middle ground, though no official updates to the legislative calendar have been made.

Tim Scott, a U.S. senator, has revealed that this week banks and crypto lobbyists may compromise regarding stablecoin yield payments. In the current scenario, the Senate’s crypto market structure bill progress is stalled.

Scott attended a crypto lobby event in Washington chaired by the Senate Banking Committee, in which he said that he anticipates having the first proposal in his hands to take a look at. He further added that if that really happens before the end of this week, and I think that it will. I think we are going to be in much better shape.

The bill about which he is talking is the Senate’s crypto market structure legislation, officially known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which was rolled out to define how regulators will look after digital assets and describe the roles of various agencies.

Although progress revolving the legislation came to a standstill after disagreements arose over a provision that would prohibit third parties from providing stablecoin yield payments. Bankers claim that such yield offerings make a loophole that could take deposits away from traditional banks.

The crypto proponents say the limitation is anti-competitive and restricts user incentives. The bill is of concern to the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The Rigorous Meetings

Senate Banking, which looks after the SEC, indefinitely delayed a markup of the bill in January. Afterward, the Senate Agriculture Committee, which looks after the CFTC, progressed its version to the Senate floor.

In the last weeks, bankers and crypto lobbyists have met in various closed-door meetings to negotiate a middle ground, but the Senate Banking Committee has not yet set any official updates to the legislative calendar.

In the latest comments, House Financial Services Committee chair French Hill mentioned the CLARITY Act can help address some of the unresolved issues associated with stablecoin regulation and wider market structure concerns.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

OKX has Launched a Security-Packed Agentic Wallet

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main breakthrough that Senator Tim Scott signaled regarding stablecoin regulation?

ASenator Tim Scott signaled that banks and crypto lobbyists may compromise on the dispute over stablecoin yield payments, potentially leading to a proposal being reviewed by the end of the week.

QWhich specific bill is being discussed in relation to crypto market structure and stablecoin yields?

AThe bill being discussed is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which aims to define regulatory oversight of digital assets and assign roles to various agencies.

QWhy did progress on the crypto market structure bill stall in the Senate?

AProgress stalled due to disagreements over a provision that would prohibit third parties from providing stablecoin yield payments, with bankers arguing it creates a loophole that could divert deposits from traditional banks.

QWhat are the opposing views between bankers and crypto proponents on stablecoin yield payments?

ABankers claim stablecoin yield offerings create a loophole that could take deposits away from traditional banks, while crypto proponents argue the limitation is anti-competitive and restricts user incentives.

QWhich congressional committees are involved in overseeing the crypto market structure legislation?

AThe Senate Banking Committee (overseeing the SEC) and the Senate Agriculture Committee (overseeing the CFTC) are involved, with the House Financial Services Committee also commenting on the CLARITY Act's potential to address regulatory issues.

Leituras Relacionadas

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbitHá 37m

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbitHá 43m

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbitHá 43m

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbitHá 44m

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbitHá 44m

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinistHá 1h

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbitHá 3h

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point