Those Who Can't Buy Anthropic Are Driving Its Shadow Stock to 16 Times Its Value

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-25Última atualização em 2026-03-25

Resumo

A new closed-end fund, VCX, listed on the NYSE, saw its share price surge to 16 times its net asset value due to high demand for exposure to Anthropic, which holds a 21% stake in the fund. Anthropic, recently valued at $380 billion in a private funding round, is not publicly traded, making VCX one of the few ways for retail investors to gain indirect access. The fund's limited liquidity, with most shares locked until September, amplified buying pressure. Similar funds without significant Anthropic or OpenAI stakes performed poorly, highlighting that the frenzy is specifically tied to AI-related FOMO. However, the premium is considered temporary, as it may vanish once Anthropic and other held companies like SpaceX go public, expected in 2026-2027. The phenomenon reflects broader investor anxiety about missing out on transformative AI companies that are reshaping industries while remaining private longer.

Author: David, TechFlow Deep Tide

Last Thursday, a new stock appeared on the NYSE with the ticker VCX.

It is actually a fund. The fund holds shares in companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX. Anthropic accounts for 21% and OpenAI for 10%.

These companies have one thing in common: none of them are publicly listed, and ordinary people cannot buy their shares.

VCX is one of the very few vehicles available on the market that allows ordinary investors to indirectly hold shares in Anthropic.

Its net asset value is $19 per share. On the first day of trading, it opened at $42, surged to $125 during the session, and closed at $76. On the fourth trading day, it hit a high of $315 intraday, triggering volatility halts twice.

Four days, from $19 to $315.

Investors are essentially paying 16 times the actual asset value to snap up this fund. Not because the fund manager is exceptionally skilled, but because it contains Anthropic.

A month ago, Anthropic just raised $30 billion at a valuation of $380 billion, making it the second-largest financing round globally this year. Its annualized revenue is $14 billion. But it is not publicly listed, has no stock ticker, and you cannot find it in any brokerage's search box.

If you can't buy the real thing, go for the shadow. VCX is currently the shadow of Anthropic, or rather, the shadow of AI FOMO.

Why is it so expensive?

VCX is not a traditional fund.

With ordinary funds, if you think it's expensive, you can wait for it to drop because the fund manager can issue more shares; supply is elastic. VCX is a closed-end fund. The number of shares was locked at the time of listing and will not increase.

More importantly, the vast majority of shares cannot be sold. Investors who bought before February 20 had their shares locked for six months and cannot trade until September. VCX has over 100,000 investors, but only a very small portion of shares are actually available for trading on the market right now.

What does this mean? Many people want to buy, but very few shares are available to buy. A small amount of buying pressure can twist the price out of shape.

So that 16x premium is essentially pricing "how many people want a piece of Anthropic and how narrow the door is." But this hunger wasn't created by VCX itself.

Chart: Top 10 Holdings of Fundrise's VCX Fund

Over the past decade, a structural change has occurred in the tech industry: the best companies are going public later and later, or not at all.

When Facebook went public in 2012, its valuation was $104 billion, which was an astronomical figure at the time. Today, Anthropic's private valuation is more than three times that of Facebook's IPO, but it previously had no clear plans to go public;

OpenAI is valued at $500 billion and is also not public. News about SpaceX preparing for an IPO has been circulating for over a year, with no confirmed date yet.

A decade ago, a company of this size would have long since rung the bell on the NYSE. Now they don't need to. The private market can provide almost unlimited capital, without the pressure of quarterly reports or dealing with retail investors and short sellers.

For founders, this is a rational choice. For ordinary investors, it means that the fastest-growing companies in history are behind a glass wall, out of reach.

VCX was originally scheduled to list on March 9 but was delayed for ten days due to the Iran war. In those ten days, nothing changed—Anthropic's price didn't go up or down, the fund's holdings didn't change a single share. But the delay itself brewed another ten days of anticipation.

When it finally listed, all the pent-up demand from those ten days squeezed through an extremely narrow passage.

Not all shadows are valuable

There are more ways to gain exposure to shares of unlisted companies than just the VCX fund.

But before discussing these avenues, there's a more fundamental question: Anthropic isn't public, so how did a publicly traded fund get its shares?

The answer is the back door.

Large private companies do a funding round every few months, from Series A to Series G, each time letting new investors in. Anthropic just closed a $30 billion Series G last month, with a long list of participating institutions from GIC to Sequoia to Goldman Sachs. These rounds are usually only open to institutional investors, with minimums often starting in the tens of millions of dollars.

But there is a second path.

Just because a company isn't public doesn't mean its shares can't be traded privately. Early employees and angel investors hold shares, and some of them want to cash out early. This creates a secondary market for private companies—not public, not transparent, but real trades happen.

Fundrise started buying on these two paths back in 2022, when valuations of private tech companies had just experienced a crash and prices were cheap. Over four years, they accumulated a portfolio including Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX. Then they packaged it into VCX, listed it on the NYSE, and now ordinary people can buy it like a stock.

In the same month, at least three similar funds were trading on the NYSE, all selling the same concept:

Selling you, through the front door, what was bought through the back door.

Robinhood created a fund called RVI, listed on March 6 with an issue price of $25. Its holdings include Databricks, Revolut, Ramp—all good private companies. It fell 11% on its first day, closing at $21.

Destiny Tech100, ticker DXYZ, listed in 2024, is a pioneer in this space. Heavily weighted in SpaceX, with a 16% holding. It only added a small exposure to Anthropic indirectly in February of this year. Its price is now hovering around $24.

There's also XOVR, the first ETF approved to directly hold shares of private companies, with SpaceX making up about 21%.

Four funds, similar structures, similar concepts, all trading on the same exchange. But their fates are completely different.

VCX rose 1500% in four days. RVI broke issue price on its first day. DXYZ is lukewarm.

VCX holds 21% Anthropic and 10% OpenAI. RVI's holdings include neither Anthropic nor OpenAI. DXYZ's exposure to Anthropic was added recently and is very small.

This shows that, at least for now, the market isn't chasing "shares in private companies." The market is chasing Anthropic.

Whoever is closest to them is valuable.

That's where Robinhood's RVI lost out. Databricks and Revolut are certainly good companies, but clearly, right now, they are not the name people are willing to pay a 16x premium for.

Shadows also have an expiration date

What are those who bought VCX at $312 betting on?

They are betting that before the door opens, someone else will be willing to pay an even higher price for the privilege of not being able to get Anthropic directly.

However, this door won't stay closed forever.

VCX has over 100,000 investors, and the vast majority of their shares are locked for six months. The lock-up period ends on September 19. At that time, a large number of shares will flood the market, and supply will change overnight from极度稀缺 (extremely scarce) to abundant.

The reason VCX can sell at a 16x premium is half because it contains Anthropic, and half perhaps because so few shares are available to sell. Once the lock-up period ends, the second condition disappears.

There is an even bigger variable.

Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceX—all three are rumored to be targeting IPOs in the second half of 2026 to 2027. Anthropic just raised $30 billion last month at a $380 billion valuation and has already hired Silicon Valley law firm Wilson Sonsini for IPO preparations. SpaceX's CFO has been communicating with investors about an IPO since the end of last year, targeting mid-year.

Once the real thing goes public, the shadow becomes worthless.

If you can directly type Anthropic's stock ticker into your brokerage search box, why would you pay a 16x premium for a fund that indirectly holds it?

For example, DXYZ also surged wildly when it first listed in 2024, but as SpaceX's IPO was delayed, the hype faded, and its price fell by more than half from its high.

So, VCX investors are experiencing a classic countdown.

What they bought for 16 times the price is not shares in Anthropic, but a ticket with an expiration date. When the door opens depends on when Anthropic decides to go public.

Before that, the premium is maintained by scarcity; after that, the premium goes to zero.

But the phenomenon of shadow stocks itself is not accidental.

Every technological wave creates the same anxiety: you can't buy the most important companies. In the 2000s, before Google's IPO, Goldman Sachs employees fought fiercely internally for allocations. In 2020, it was SpaceX, and secondary market intermediaries in Silicon Valley became the most sought-after connections overnight.

Now it's AI's turn.

And this time the anxiety is deeper. Anthropic and OpenAI may not be profitable now, but they are rewriting the rules. Because of AI's impact, SaaS stocks crashed, security stocks crashed, and IBM lost $31 billion in a day.

Investors see not just "this company is very profitable," but "if I'm not on its side, I might be on the side it runs over."

The 16x premium of VCX isn't pricing just a fund; it's pricing this anxiety itself.

The ticket will expire, the premium will fade. But as long as AI keeps accelerating, as long as the most valuable companies keep their doors closed, there will be people willing to pay irrational prices for the shadow.

Not because the shadow is worth that much, but because the feeling of being locked out is too expensive.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the VCX fund and why did its price surge dramatically upon listing?

AVCX is a closed-end fund listed on the NYSE that holds shares in private companies like Anthropic (21%) and OpenAI (10%). Its price surged to 16 times its net asset value due to extreme scarcity of tradable shares and high demand from investors seeking exposure to these coveted, pre-IPO AI companies.

QWhy are top tech companies like Anthropic and OpenAI delaying their IPOs, and how does this affect retail investors?

ALeading tech companies are delaying IPOs because private markets provide ample capital without the quarterly reporting pressures and scrutiny from public investors. This excludes retail investors from directly accessing the fastest-growing companies, fueling demand for indirect vehicles like VCX.

QHow did Fundrise's VCX fund acquire shares in private companies like Anthropic?

AFundrise acquired shares through secondary markets, where early employees and investors sell their stakes, and by participating in private funding rounds, assembling a portfolio of pre-IPO companies like Anthropic and OpenAI over four years.

QWhat risks do investors face when buying VCX at a significant premium to its net asset value?

AInvestors risk a sharp price decline when the six-month lockup period ends in September, flooding the market with shares, and if Anthropic or OpenAI IPO, making the indirect fund obsolete as direct ownership becomes available.

QHow does the market's reaction to VCX compare to other similar funds like RVI and DXYZ?

AVCX's 1500% surge dwarfed RVI's drop and DXYZ's stagnation because VCX held substantial Anthropic and OpenAI exposure, while others lacked these specific high-demand AI assets, highlighting that the frenzy is focused on Anthropic, not private equities broadly.

Leituras Relacionadas

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHá 1h

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHá 1h

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHá 1h

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHá 1h

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHá 1h

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片