The World Belongs to Chinese People Who Speak English

marsbitPublicado em 2026-02-28Última atualização em 2026-02-28

Resumo

The article argues that the world belongs to Chinese people who speak English, positing that a blend of Eastern and Western cultural values creates a powerful advantage, particularly in entrepreneurship. It contrasts Western "romanticism"—characterized by idealism, risk-taking, and long-term vision—with Chinese pragmatism and structural thinking. The author, educated in a US liberal arts college, credits Western education for fostering trust and ambition, while Chinese upbringing provides crucial grounding in practical business models. This hybrid mindset is presented as ideal for navigating global opportunities, exemplified by ventures like a crypto project that successfully merges centralized efficiency with decentralized security. The core message is an exhortation for Chinese individuals to learn English and engage with the world to leverage this cultural synthesis, asserting that limiting oneself to one hemisphere is a missed opportunity.

Just scroll through Instagram and TikTok, and you'll see all kinds of "chinamaxxing" wellness memes. Adidas' new Tang suit jacket sold out instantly online (all bought by foreigners).

Foreign media likes to attribute this to "the rise of China's soft power," but I tend to believe it's the result of a blend of opposition and fusion between Chinese and Western cultures, a result that is particularly evident among entrepreneurs.

On one hand, there's the pragmatism and structural sense ingrained in our DNA from our ancestors; on the other, there's modern Western thought that strips away the overly pedantic parts of traditional wisdom and reshapes a personal form. This combination is inherently well-suited for entrepreneurship.

Western society allows you to be romantic, to be impulsive, to bet on long-term, irrational things. Even if you fail, it doesn't immediately negate your worth as a person. This is a huge tolerance space granted at the institutional and cultural levels.

I studied at a liberal arts college in the US, majoring in psychology, taking courses like metaphysics and art history. My parents always complained that I was learning a bunch of "useless things." But it was precisely these seemingly useless courses that gave me develop an almost instinctive, even somewhat irrational, trust in human agency and mutual tolerance.

I call this state romantic because it is completely opposite to the cynical attitude of "早就看透了" (having seen through it all) or "一眼望到底" (seeing the end at a glance) that is deeply ingrained in many Chinese people.

It is this romanticism that enables a person to dare to give up a stable, high-paying job to start a business, to dare to invest money in a smart contract that hasn't been thoroughly audited. More importantly, it is a way to reconcile with oneself. When you allow yourself to be impulsive, to get excited, to have expectations for long-term value, you also allow yourself to be happy, allow others to be happy, and allow society to improve together.

Of course, if Western romanticism is taken to the extreme, it can easily become detached from reality, floating in the air and getting nothing done. At this point, the pragmatic educational philosophy inherent in Chinese culture becomes particularly important.

Chinese entrepreneurs often prefer to use the term "做生意 / make business," while in the English-speaking world, entrepreneurship is called "start-up." Chinese entrepreneurship prioritizes the business model first (aka, whose money are you making), while the West focuses on the act of starting up.

The crypto space in recent years has been harshly taught a lesson about "not getting things done." A massive amount of energy was spent on low-level narratives and conceptual packaging, while真正的 applications were few and far between. In the end, it was the most primitive赛道 of "speculating on coins" that was firmly controlled by a group of Asian players.

When I first saw Mega's whitepaper, I almost instinctively thought: "This architecture is so reasonable." Centralized sequencer + Ethereum security = faster chain. The logic was clear and straightforward. But this "Sino-Western hybrid" logic is taboo in the eyes of many foreigners because, in their context, centralization is almost synonymous with original sin.

But in my view, centralization was never the original sin; it's just a tool. Many Western teams, operating in a politically correct environment, could never make a choice like Mega's. Yet we can inherit the思维 of "concentrating resources to accomplish major tasks" while using decentralized security as the ultimate backing, instantly expanding the entire想象空间.

But if I had only received a Chinese education, I also know that at best, I could only run a small workshop or small business. What truly made me believe that this kind of "centralized trade-off" could spawn new applications and scale up the entire ecosystem was the Western education I received. It made me dare to believe in system design, believe in structural choices, believe in the possibility of scaling.

Finally, people often tell me I'm a typical "banana person," yellow on the outside, white on the inside. I beg to differ. The world is never black and white, nor is it strictly East or West. The greatest advantage of someone who has truly experienced multiple cultures is the ability to absorb the strengths of each and then recombine them.

Take me, for example. I finished high school in Beijing, went to university in the US, graduated and went to Nigeria in Africa, and later settled down in Dubai, the Middle East. You ask me if I'm a banana or a sweet date, I don't know. But I know one thing:

If you are also a Chinese person who speaks English, you must be brave enough to step out and face the clash of Eastern and Western cultures head-on; there will eventually be arbitrage opportunities for you here. If you were born in China and don't speak English, you must learn it, and then go out into the world.

The world is vast, and only playing half of it is such a waste.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat does the author identify as the key advantage of combining Chinese and Eastern cultural perspectives?

AThe author believes the combination of Chinese pragmatism and structural thinking with Western romanticism and tolerance for risk creates a powerful hybrid mindset ideal for entrepreneurship, allowing individuals to leverage the strengths of both cultures—practical business acumen with innovative, long-term vision.

QHow does the author define 'romanticism' in the context of Western education's influence?

AThe author defines this 'romanticism' as a mindset that trusts human subjectivity, embraces impulsiveness, allows for long-term, non-rational bets, and fosters personal and societal happiness—contrasting with a cynical 'seen-it-all' attitude.

QAccording to the author, what is a fundamental difference between Chinese and Western approaches to entrepreneurship?

AThe author states that Chinese entrepreneurship often focuses first on the business model and revenue streams ('make business'), while Western entrepreneurship emphasizes the act of starting up itself and the vision behind it.

QWhy does the author argue that 'centralization is not an original sin' but a tool, using Mega as an example?

AThe author argues that centralization is merely a tool, and Mega's design—a centralized sequencer with Ethereum security for a faster chain—demonstrates a pragmatic, effective hybrid solution that Western 'political correctness' might reject outright, thus creating an advantage.

QWhat is the core advice the author gives to Chinese people regarding English and global engagement?

AThe author's core advice is that Chinese people who speak English should boldly engage with the world to leverage cultural differences for opportunity, and those who don't should learn English and then go global, because 'the world is big, and playing only half of it is a total waste.'

Leituras Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHá 18m

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHá 18m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHá 33m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHá 33m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PEOPLE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Depois de comprar o teu ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Transaciona facilmente ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

543 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar PEOPLE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PEOPLE (PEOPLE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片