The Strategy of Accumulating Cryptocurrency on Company Balance Sheets Is Worn Out — Bloomberg

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-24Última atualização em 2026-08-24

Resumo

The strategy of companies accumulating cryptocurrency on their balance sheets has become outdated, according to Bloomberg. Since the start of the year, the market capitalization of such Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies in the US and Canada has fallen by 43%. Shares of Strategy, a major corporate Bitcoin holder, have dropped over 20% this year and are down more than 70% from their mid-2025 peak. This downturn, turning DATs into a toxic asset for investors, followed the broader crypto market's decline from its autumn 2025 highs, where Bitcoin lost over a third and Ethereum halved in value. This created a negative cycle where falling crypto prices reduced the collateral for company loans, forcing asset sales that further depressed prices. Attempts by at least ten DATs to pivot, often to artificial intelligence, have largely failed, resulting in significant stock price declines for companies like Wave Media and AlphaTON Capital. The exception has been crypto miners like CoreWeave, who successfully leveraged their existing computing infrastructure for new ventures. Many companies, including miners and data center operators, are now selling their crypto holdings. Recent examples include Hyperscale Data selling $43 million in Bitcoin, Strategy selling $108.6 million in BTC for a share buyback, and Japan's Quantum Solutions selling Ethereum to fund its AI business.

Since the beginning of the year, the market capitalization of companies in the US and Canada whose business model is based on accumulating cryptocurrency (DAT, digital asset treasury companies) has declined by 43%. Shares of Strategy, the largest public corporate holder of Bitcoin, have fallen by more than 20% over these months and have lost over 70% from their peak values in the summer of 2025.

As a result, DATs have become a toxic asset for investors, writes Bloomberg. At the same time, there are about 150 DATs in the market, the vast majority of which bet on Bitcoin. All of them, to one degree or another, copied Strategy's model—after its stock soared 3000% in 2024 compared to the end of 2019.

The long-term trend reversed in the fall of 2025 when cryptocurrency prices peaked and began to decline. Bitcoin lost more than a third of its value, and Ethereum halved. The model, which previously worked on the upside, started working in the opposite direction: the decline in the value of digital assets reduced the collateral base for borrowed funds, forcing companies to repay loans. To do this, they had to sell cryptocurrency, which further pressured prices and strengthened the downward trend, Bloomberg notes.

In an effort to maintain investor interest, at least ten DATs announced a change in their business model and attempted to earn money from artificial intelligence. However, Wave Media, which shifted its focus from buying Bitcoin to building data centers, lost nearly 87% of its value. Lixte Biotechnology, which previously invested in cryptocurrencies, fell 40% after merging with a battery development company. AlphaTON Capital, which specialized in altcoins, halved in value after announcing its entry into the cloud computing market.

The only group of players that managed to successfully restructure were crypto miners—their advantage lay in having ready-made computing infrastructure. For example, CoreWeave, which started its transformation earlier than others, has more than doubled in value since its IPO in 2025. Miners Hut 8, Iren, and TeraWulf also received increased investor attention.

At the same time, many companies, including miners and data center owners, have begun selling off their crypto holdings. Recently, Hyperscale Data, which manages AI data centers and trades on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker GPUS, announced the sale of 685 bitcoins for $43 million.

Strategy recently sold 1,690 BTC for $108.6 million. The company intends to use the proceeds to buy back its own preferred STRC shares. In July, Quantum Solutions, Japan's largest Ethereum holder, disposed of 1,000 ETH for $1.9 million to develop its artificial intelligence business.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Bloomberg, why has the strategy of companies accumulating cryptocurrency on their balance sheets become outdated?

AThe strategy has become outdated because it has turned into a toxic asset for investors. The model, which worked during a rising market, reversed when cryptocurrency prices started to fall, forcing companies to sell their crypto to cover loans. This selling further depressed prices, creating a downward spiral.

QWhat is the acronym DAT in the context of this article, and what happened to the market capitalization of these companies in the US and Canada since the start of the year?

ADAT stands for digital asset treasury companies. Their market capitalization in the US and Canada has fallen by 43% since the start of the year.

QHow have some DAT companies tried to pivot their business models to retain investor interest, and what were the results for Wave Media and AlphaTON Capital?

AAt least ten DAT companies announced a shift in their business model to focus on artificial intelligence to retain investor interest. Wave Media, which shifted from buying Bitcoin to building data centers, lost nearly 87% of its value. AlphaTON Capital, which moved into cloud computing, saw its value halved.

QWhich group of players has successfully transitioned according to the article, and what is cited as their key advantage?

ACryptocurrency miners have successfully transitioned. Their key advantage was having an existing computational infrastructure ready for repurposing.

QWhat actions have several companies, including Hyperscale Data and Strategy, recently taken regarding their cryptocurrency holdings?

ASeveral companies have started selling off their cryptocurrency holdings. Hyperscale Data sold 685 Bitcoins for $43 million. Strategy sold 1,690 BTC for $108.6 million, intending to use the funds to buy back its preferred stock. Quantum Solutions in Japan sold 1,000 ETH for $1.9 million to fund its AI business.

Leituras Relacionadas

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

**EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Reducing Staking "Subsidies" – What Does Ethereum Want in Return?** EIP-8363 proposes burning an increasing portion of validator rewards as the staking rate rises, reaching 100% burn when 50% of ETH is staked. This analysis models its impact on issuance, yield, and staking equilibrium, examines whether ETH's yield explains its price, quantifies the chain economy's reliance on this yield, and presents conclusions. Key findings: 1. **EIP-1559 Burns Are Ineffective:** Post-merge, burning (via base fees) has collapsed by 98% and now offsets only 2.4% of new ETH issuance, making issuance policy Ethereum's sole remaining supply lever. 2. **EIP-8363's Real Impact:** At the current ~42.2M ETH staked, the proposal would cut issuance by ~58.6% and staking APR by ~56.4%, removing ~633k ETH ($1.55B) in annual dilution (0.53% of market cap). It's not zero issuance; that would require 43% more ETH staked. 3. **Self-Limiting Mechanism:** The design has a built-in equilibrium. At reasonable required returns (e.g., 2%), the system stabilizes at ~26% staking rate and ~0.48% annual inflation. 4. **Yield vs. Price:** No detectable statistical relationship exists between changes in staking yield and ETH price returns over 43 months. The natural 37% yield decline since 2023 did not drive price action. 5. **Chain Economy Dependence:** While LSTs like wstETH form ~34% of collateral in major lending markets, their utility as collateral remains if yield is positive. The direct revenue hit to protocols like Lido is significant (~50% of fee income) but not systemic. Staking-focused ETFs represent only 0.19% of ETH supply. 6. **Core Conflict:** The debate masks a zero-sum redistribution: cutting ~$1.55B in annual issuance transfers value from concentrated staking intermediaries (LST/LRT protocols, leverage players) to the dispersed majority of non-staking ETH holders. 7. **Outlook:** The proposal is economically sound for ETH's scarcity but politically difficult due to concentrated opposition. It is unlikely to pass in its current form.

marsbitHá 46m

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

marsbitHá 46m

Trading

Spot
活动图片