The Second Half of Stablecoins No Longer Belongs to the Crypto World

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-21Última atualização em 2026-03-21

Resumo

The article discusses the shift in the stablecoin market from the crypto sector to traditional finance, highlighted by Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK for up to $1.8 billion in March 2026. This move came after Coinbase abandoned a $2 billion deal for BVNK months earlier, signaling intensified competition for stablecoin infrastructure. BVNK specializes in cross-border payments using a "stablecoin sandwich" model: converting fiat to stablecoins like USDC for blockchain transfer, then back to local currency, reducing transaction times and costs. Its key asset is a suite of global licenses, including EMI from the UK FCA and CASP under EU MiCA, enabling compliance across 130+ countries. Mastercard's acquisition aims to integrate BVNK into its Multi-Token Network (MTN), a private blockchain for tokenized assets, addressing MTN's lack of connectivity with public chains. This enables atomic settlements, 24/7 B2B transactions, and programmable payments. The strategy contrasts with Visa’s partnership-focused approach, emphasizing direct control over infrastructure. The U.S. GENIUS Act (July 2025) provided regulatory clarity, defining stablecoins as non-securities under OCC oversight, which facilitated Mastercard’s move. The deal pressures players like Ripple and traditional correspondent banks, as Mastercard’s global network could disrupt cross-border payment fees. Ultimately, stablecoin evolution is becoming invisible to users—embedded in traditional finance for efficienc...

Author:白话区块链

March 17, 2026, Mastercard announced the acquisition of BVNK for up to $1.8 billion.

This name is almost unheard of outside the crypto circle. But four months ago, Coinbase was willing to pay $2 billion for it, reaching the due diligence stage before pulling out at the last moment.

What a crypto exchange giant just abandoned, a traditional payment giant immediately picked up, and at a 10% discount.

The signal from this deal couldn't be clearer:The battle for stablecoin infrastructure has spread from within the crypto world to the heart of traditional finance.

What Coinbase Didn't Want, Mastercard Rushed to Buy

First, the failed acquisition.

In October 2025, Coinbase and BVNK signed an exclusive negotiation agreement, with an offer of approximately $2 billion. After entering due diligence, both parties announced in November that they would not proceed further. The reasons were not made public, but industry speculation points in several directions:As a crypto exchange, Coinbase faces much higher regulatory pressure for mergers and acquisitions than traditional financial institutions; and Coinbase itself is also investing more resources in the endogenous growth of the Base chain. Spending $2 billion to buy a payment intermediary might not be the optimal choice.

Mastercard entered the scene almost simultaneously as Coinbase withdrew. The process from介入谈判 to locking in the deal was extremely fast.

The deal structure was $1.5 billion in upfront cash plus a $300 million performance-based earn-out. Considering BVNK's valuation was only $750 million during its Series B funding round in December 2024, the $1.8 billion price tag意味着 the value more than doubled in just over a year.This premium isn't for technology, it's for licenses and pipelines.

An interesting comparison: In October 2024, Stripe acquired the stablecoin company Bridge for $1.1 billion. A year and a half later, Mastercard offered $1.8 billion for BVNK. The value of stablecoin infrastructure continues to rise.Pricing power in this sector is shifting from crypto VCs to the CFOs of traditional finance.

What Exactly is BVNK Selling?

For example:

An export老板 in Guangzhou making plush toys needs to receive payment from a buyer in Nigeria every quarter.The traditional path is through correspondent banks:Money starts from a Nigerian bank, passes through at least two intermediary banks, deducting several layers of fees, arrives in 2-3 days, and the exchange rate is also marked down. If it coincides with a weekend or African bank system maintenance, add another two days.

What BVNK does is called the "stablecoin sandwich":It takes in local fiat currency at the front end, automatically converts it to USDC in the backend, transmits it via blockchain, and converts it back to local currency at the destination. The entire process can be compressed to minutes, with fees an order of magnitude lower than traditional wire transfers.

But this isn't the most valuable part of BVNK. There are other companies doing similar things; Fireblocks does it, Circle does it too.BVNK's real moat is that stack of licenses.

In the UK, it acquired an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license issued by the FCA through its acquisition of System Pay Services. In the EU, it obtained a CASP license under the MiCA framework from the Malta Financial Services Authority, allowing it to operate throughout the European Economic Area. Add to that coverage for fiat currency exchange in over 130 countries, an annual processing volume of approximately $30 billion, and clients including Worldpay, Flywire, and dLocal—all major players in the payments industry.

Simply put,BVNK is a stablecoin plumber that already has a global passport. In today's increasingly strict regulatory environment, this passport is more valuable than any technology.

Mastercard's Real Intent: The Missing Piece for MTN

Mastercard's purchase of BVNK is not a whim.

For the past two years, Mastercard has been building something called the Multi-Token Network (MTN)—a private, permissioned blockchain specifically for settling tokenized bank deposits, regulated stablecoins, and tokenized assets. JPMorgan and Standard Chartered have already conducted tests on it.

But MTN has a critical weakness: it is a closed network, lacking efficient bridges to the public链 world.You can think of MTN as a newly built highway, but without on-ramps and off-ramps connecting it to city streets.

BVNK is that ramp.

After the acquisition, Mastercard can suddenly do much more. Atomic settlement—payment and ownership transfer simultaneously, no longer waiting for ACH or SWIFT's 2-3 day delay. 24/7 cross-border B2B settlement, regardless of whether banks are closed.And programmable payments:For example, a supplier payment where stablecoins are automatically released by a smart contract only after the system confirms shipment and an on-chain Oracle verifies it.

Mastercard also has a system called Crypto Credential, which uses human-readable aliases (similar to email addresses) instead of complex wallet addresses, ensuring every transaction complies with the FATF Travel Rule.BVNK's infrastructure directly integrates with this authentication, allowing merchants to receive stablecoins without touching private keys.

It's worth noting the divergence in strategies between Mastercard and Visa here.Visa is taking the "make friends" route—partnering with Solana, deeply integrating with Circle, and building a platform called VTAP for tokenized assets, focusing on the retail end and USDC.Mastercard, on the other hand, has chosen to "buy out"—spending heavily to swallow core infrastructure directly, building its own multi-chain, multi-asset network, focusing on heavy-duty B2B settlement.

Which path is right? Unknown. But Mastercard's path is more expensive and also more irreversible.

The GENIUS Act: The True Catalyst for This Deal

Mastercard dared to spend $1.8 billion based on one prerequisite:In July 2025, the U.S. President signed the《GENIUS Act》.

This is the first comprehensive federal legislation on stablecoins in U.S. history. It does several key things:Clarifies that "payment stablecoins" are neither securities nor commodities, falling under the jurisdiction of bank regulators (OCC); requires issuers to maintain 1:1 highly liquid reserves and undergo monthly audits; even if the issuer goes bankrupt, holders have priority claim rights to the reserve assets.

Translation:Stablecoins are finally out of the gray area.For a publicly traded company like Mastercard, this means the board can approve large acquisitions without worrying about the SEC knocking on the door in the middle of the night.

By acquiring BVNK, an entity licensed in multiple countries, Mastercard essentially bought a "regulated seat." Under the GENIUS Act framework, it can more freely manage and issue payment stablecoins, with compliance costs largely pre-digested.

This is also why Coinbase couldn't close the deal while Mastercard could—As a licensed bank service provider, the regulatory certainty for Mastercard to integrate BVNK is far higher than for a crypto exchange.

Who Should Be Nervous?

The most direct impact falls on Ripple. Cross-border payments are a story Ripple has been telling for nearly a decade, but it始终 lacked Mastercard's network covering 150 million merchants worldwide. Now that Mastercard itself possesses on-chain settlement capabilities, Ripple's narrative becomes awkward—Your technology might have been earlier, but their pipeline is thicker.

Traditional correspondent banks aren't doing well either.If Mastercard can route high-value B2B payments directly through the on-chain轨道, those banks that rely on cross-border remittance intermediary fees may see their commission income plummet.

However, there are also different voices within the crypto community. Stablecoins were originally a product of the decentralized world, but now the流量 is running on Mastercard's permissioned链 and licensed nodes—how is this different from traditional finance?The Bank of England is already worried about something else:If stablecoins become too easy to use, and consumers move bank deposits to stablecoin accounts, what happens to commercial banks' credit supply?

Summary

Ultimately,stablecoins are transforming from "crypto products" into "financial pipelines."As Mastercard's Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert said, most financial institutions and fintech companies will迟早 offer digital currency services—what Mastercard aims to do is become that pipeline.

Users swipe cards at the front end, while USDC might be running in the backend. They don't perceive the blockchain; they only perceive faster and cheaper.

This is the true face of stablecoin mainstreaming: not making everyone use crypto wallets, but making everyone use stablecoins unknowingly.

$1.8 billion—Mastercard isn't buying a company; it's buying the toll booth for the next-generation payment system.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the key signal from the Mastercard-BVNK acquisition regarding the stablecoin infrastructure battle?

AThe acquisition signaled that the battle for stablecoin infrastructure has expanded from within the crypto industry to the heart of traditional finance.

QWhy did Coinbase abandon its planned acquisition of BVNK, and why was Mastercard able to proceed?

ACoinbase likely faced higher regulatory scrutiny as a crypto exchange and chose to focus resources on its Base chain. Mastercard, as a licensed traditional financial services provider, had greater regulatory certainty and could integrate BVNK's licensed operations more easily.

QWhat is BVNK's core business model and its main competitive advantage (its 'moat')?

ABVNK's core business is the 'stablecoin sandwich' model, facilitating fast, low-cost cross-border payments by converting local fiat to stablecoins like USDC for transfer. Its main competitive advantage is its portfolio of global licenses (e.g., UK EMI, EU CASP under MiCA), which act as a regulatory moat.

QHow does the GENIUS Act serve as a catalyst for deals like Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK?

AThe GENIUS Act provided the first comprehensive U.S. federal legislation for stablecoins, clarifying they are not securities, establishing clear regulatory oversight, and ensuring consumer protections. This regulatory clarity gave public companies like Mastercard the confidence to pursue major acquisitions in the space without fear of sudden regulatory action.

QWhat is the ultimate vision for stablecoins as illustrated by Mastercard's strategy, according to the article?

AThe ultimate vision is for stablecoins to transition from a 'crypto product' to a 'financial pipeline.' Users will experience faster, cheaper payments without needing to interact directly with blockchain technology or crypto wallets, using them seamlessly in the background of traditional financial services.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin at a Critical Juncture: Analysts Report Significant Technical Consolidation! Here's What to Expect

Cryptocurrency analyst Benjamin Cowen analyzed Bitcoin's current market situation based on technical indicators and historical cycles. According to Cowen, Bitcoin has entered a critical phase of technical consolidation that will determine its near-term direction. Two key technical levels are highlighted on Bitcoin's chart: the Bear Market Resistance Band, which continues to decline near $69,000, and the 200-week moving average, which continues to rise near $63,700. Cowen stated that as these levels converge, the price is becoming increasingly compressed, forcing the market to choose a breakout direction before the final quarter of the year. He predicts that once a decision is made, market volatility will increase significantly. Reviewing historical cycles in midterm election years, Cowen noted that July typically sees gains (e.g., +20% in 2022, ~+40% in 2018, ~+7% in 2024), while August often brings declines (e.g., -15% in 2022, -15% in 2018, -18% in 2014). He warns that a new "window of weakness" could open from mid-August, with a potential ~10% correction possibly pushing the price below $60,000. Cowen also observed that the MVRV ratio, an on-chain indicator, has not yet reached its historical low below zero. He concluded that while a Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) strategy remains sensible for the latter half of the year, investors should prepare for short-term volatility.

cryptonews.ruHá 5m

Bitcoin at a Critical Juncture: Analysts Report Significant Technical Consolidation! Here's What to Expect

cryptonews.ruHá 5m

US and Japan's Unprecedented Joint Action in 30 Years Marks End of Yen Carry Trade Era

Japan and the U.S. conducted a rare coordinated intervention in the foreign exchange market around August 3rd to stem the yen's sharp depreciation. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessette's notepad, photographed by Reuters, revealed plans for a $5-10 billion yen-buying operation. Following official confirmation, the USD/JPY pair plunged from near 164 to around 155-156. The intervention marks a significant shift as the U.S. moved from verbal support to practical coordination. While the core carry trade logic—exploiting the higher U.S. interest rates—remains intact, the risk structure has changed. Traders must now account for potential repeated bilateral actions, altering the risk-reward calculation for yen shorts. The intervention's immediate effect is forcing leveraged positions to unwind, amplifying the yen's rebound. However, analysts note this does not signal the end of the yen carry trade. The fundamental driver—the wide interest rate differential between the U.S. (3.50%-3.75%) and Japan (1%)—persists. The action is seen more as buying time for the Bank of Japan's gradual policy normalization while mitigating imported inflation pressures. To avoid destabilizing the U.S. Treasury market during intervention, authorities utilized the Fed's FIMA repo facility, allowing Japan to obtain dollar liquidity using its Treasury holdings as collateral instead of selling them. The move aims to contain spillover risks. While creating short-term volatility and compressing leverage for yen bears, the long-term trend for the yen will ultimately depend on the convergence of U.S. and Japanese monetary policies, not unilateral market operations. The current action is narrower in scope than historical agreements like the Plaza Accord, focused on curbing excessive yen weakness rather than engineering a broad-based dollar decline.

marsbitHá 29m

US and Japan's Unprecedented Joint Action in 30 Years Marks End of Yen Carry Trade Era

marsbitHá 29m

Why Hasn't Bitcoin Made the Expected Surge? There Are Both Positive and Negative Data

Analytical firm Glassnode reports Bitcoin retreated to around $62,600 after failing to sustain above $66,000. Weak spot market demand and defensive positions in derivatives are applying downward pressure. However, structural support remains from resilient long-term holders, surging on-chain activity, and renewed inflows into Bitcoin ETFs. The price action reflects weakened spot momentum, with low trading volume and persistent seller pressure keeping Bitcoin in a consolidation phase with limited breakout potential. While open interest in derivatives has fallen, funding rates have risen again, and options investors maintain a cautious stance. Demand for downside protection has increased. Positively, Bitcoin ETFs have seen renewed net inflows and trading volume, indicating institutional repositioning. On-chain metrics show a significant spike in active addresses and adjusted transaction volume, pointing to increased network usage. The historically low ratio of short-term to long-term holders suggests long-term conviction remains firm. However, overall market profitability continues to decline as the proportion of Bitcoin in profit nears cycle lows, indicating a trend of loss realization and de-risking by investors. Glassnode concludes the Bitcoin market is in a transitional phase. Structural support is present, but valuation pressure, insufficient spot demand, and defensive derivatives positioning continue to limit overall risk appetite.

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

Why Hasn't Bitcoin Made the Expected Surge? There Are Both Positive and Negative Data

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片