The Inside Story of Pump.fun Poaching FOMO's Top Users: $20K Signing Bonus + $30K Monthly Salary

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-08-09Última atualização em 2026-08-09

Resumo

Pump.fun, a leading meme coin launchpad, is reportedly offering exclusive contracts to lure high-value users and traders away from its competitor FOMO. The alleged agreement includes a $20,000 signing bonus, a $30,000 monthly stipend, and requires users to migrate funds, use a dedicated wallet, and permanently close their FOMO accounts. This aggressive move highlights a significant shift in the competitive landscape of the meme market. FOMO, a multi-chain mobile-focused trading platform launched in 2025, has rapidly grown to challenge incumbents. Data shows its 30-day revenue recently surpassed Uniswap and Phantom, and it has overtaken GMGN to become the market leader in trading bot share. FOMO's success is largely attributed to its "social-first" design, featuring profit leaderboards and feeds that track top traders' moves. This effectively creates and promotes "meme trading influencers," turning successful traders into attention hubs that drive platform engagement and user growth. Recognizing this model's power, Pump.fun recently updated its app to replicate similar social features. The competition for influential traders signals the meme market's evolution into a "influencer-driven" phase. Platform growth now hinges less on technical features and more on securing key personalities who can attract followers and trading volume. While a standard competitive tactic, this trend risks centralizing attention around a few individuals and potentially stifling the organic, commun...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

The current Meme market is severely fragmented. Whether it's the blockchain ecosystem or the trading tools used, there is almost no intersection between overseas users and the Chinese-speaking community. This fragmentation not only diverts global Meme funds into various ecosystems but also makes "industry gossip" confusing to understand.

On August 8th, a piece of gossip about "Pump.fun spending huge sums to poach users from a competitor" went viral in overseas Meme communities.

Originally leaked by an overseas user CLR, it stated that Pump.fun is using an incentive program to lure users away from the FOMO platform to Pump.fun. According to the disclosed agreement document, Pump.fun plans to offer eligible users a one-time $20,000 signing bonus and a fixed monthly payment of $30,000. The agreement requires signed users to migrate their funds and trading positions from the FOMO platform to Pump.fun; use a new, previously unused by other platforms, wallet as their exclusive wallet; bind their X account to the Pump.fun wallet; publicly declare on their X profile that this wallet is their only public wallet; and permanently delete and close their FOMO platform account.

Additionally, users must meet real trading requirements, including completing at least $25,000 in monthly trading volume on Pump.fun (or 25% of their previous average monthly trading volume on the FOMO platform). It's clear that Pump.fun is determined to go all out to snatch users from the FOMO platform.

Translated Full Content of the Agreement (Source: 0xAA)

From a business perspective, this is a normal act of corporate competition and is perfectly legal. In entertainment platforms or user-centric business models, companies often pay KOLs or users with significant fan influence to leave competitor platforms and maintain exclusive representation on their own platform. This competition model is quite common domestically as well, such as the exorbitant exclusive contracts for internet celebrities and streamers by early short-video live-streaming platforms like Douyin, Kuaishou, Bilibili, and Huya.

But the first thing that confused onlookers about this entire incident was: Who is FOMO?

Pump.fun is the largest token launch platform overseas, consistently ranking among the top five on-chain protocols in terms of fee revenue. What reason would lead it to poach users from the FOMO platform? What kind of magic does the FOMO platform possess to become a commercial rival that makes Pump.fun nervous? Odaily Planet Daily will analyze the undercurrents and massive changes in the current overseas Meme market through this "gossip."

FOMO Has Become a Major Meme Trading Platform for Users

FOMO is a multi-chain Meme trading platform, with business and services similar to GMGN. The platform launched in May 2025 and has been in formal operation for just over a year. However, according to RootData, FOMO has completed 3 rounds of financing, raising a total of $94 million, with a valuation exceeding $550 million.

FOMO primarily serves overseas Meme communities and focuses on promoting mobile trading. Most users in the Chinese-speaking community may not have even heard of FOMO. What's even more shocking is that this platform you may never have heard of or used has already surpassed Uniswap and Phantom in revenue over the past 30 days, and its Trading Bot market share has surpassed GMGN to become number one in the market.

According to DeFiLlama data, FOMO's revenue over the past 30 days is $8.17 million. While still less than GMGN and Axiom, it has already surpassed Phantom, Uniswap, and mainstream Launchpads on Robinhood (Flap and Pons).

Meanwhile, according to Dune data, as of the time of writing, the FOMO platform's total fees have reached $30.39 million. As shown in the chart below, looking at daily fees, the FOMO platform began experiencing rapid growth starting in July, with average daily fees exceeding $200,000, having previously maintained an average of around $10,000. As of the time of writing, the FOMO platform set a new daily fee record on August 6th, reaching $556,000.

Entering August, the FOMO platform continued its high growth. As of August 8th, the FOMO platform's market share in Trading Bots has risen to 43%, surpassing GMGN to become the market leader, a position GMGN had consistently held.

How influential is FOMO now? A recent example will make it clear. On August 4th, the Solana Meme coin CATE experienced a flash crash of 65% within a minute, its market cap dropping from over $80 million to around $20 million. The community summarized two reasons: first, CATE's X account was suspended; second, FOMO went down, preventing users from trading during the outage. Of course, this incident is still controversial; interested readers can delve deeper. (Related reading:$CATE Flash Crashes 65% in One Minute, FOMO Platform's "Coincidental" Outage Raises Rug Pull Suspicions Again)

Regardless of the truth, this incident is enough to demonstrate the current influence of the FOMO platform in the Meme ecosystem. So, from a product perspective, what sets FOMO apart from numerous competitors?

The answer lies in FOMO's product design. The core services FOMO provides are similar to most Meme trading platforms, but its slogan is "the only social-first trading app." This is embodied in the product through the introduction of a profit Leaderboard and a Feed providing real-time alerts on top traders' activities.

LEADERBOARD and FEED on the FOMO platform

The Meme market inherently worships financial success – those who make enough money are considered "smart money" and gain a large following of fans and copy traders. The FOMO platform leverages this group characteristic by artificially "creating stars", using pages like the Leaderboard to deliberately push high-profit users to the forefront, helping them gain influence. On August 9th, FOMO team member @villagebythexyz posted on X, stating that compared to previous cycles, anyone with any influence in the cryptocurrency space now must be a good trader, emphasizing that "it's trading that builds your following, not your following that builds your trades."

This model has been a huge success. For example, the reason the Solana Meme coin CATE surged was not due to its compelling narrative, but rather the traffic and open support from the so-called "Little Ansem," Poorgoat. Poorgoat is a member of the FOMO Hall of Fame (a list of users recognized by FOMO for achieving substantial profits on the platform). Therefore, with the support of fans, even though CATE lacked a compelling narrative, it was still able to create a "myth."

Pump.fun recognized the immense potential of this model for platform growth. So, on August 7th, the Pump.fun APP announced a social feature upgrade. The core of the upgrade was replicating FOMO's social features. Now, entering the Pump.fun homepage, users no longer see an overwhelming stream of new Meme coin information, but rather a feed of Meme traders/KOLs and push notifications monitoring their operations.

Pump.fun Homepage

Pump.fun founder, alon, has recently been posting frequently to welcome various overseas Meme traders/KOLs to join the Pump.fun app. To attract more renowned overseas Meme traders to the Pump.fun platform, Pump.fun has even resorted to poaching from FOMO and requiring Meme traders to sign "exclusivity agreements."

Pump.fun's adoption of such competitive business practices essentially reflects that the overseas Meme market has entered an "influencer-driven model." Whoever signs the most KOLs with strong trading influence captures the market.

The Overseas Meme Market Enters the Influencer-Driven Model

From the rise of FOMO to Pump.fun's poaching behavior, we can see an important shift occurring in the overseas Meme market: the core of market competition is no longer about launch tools, trading speed, or on-chain liquidity, but rather the battle for "attention resource carriers."

As the cultural consensus and celebrity-driven narratives that the early Meme coin market relied on begin to lose effectiveness, the Meme market shifts its focus from the Meme coins themselves to the people trading them. FOMO's rapid growth logic is precisely based on this shift in market dynamics. In this model, traders replace Memes as the new content subject. Platforms package decentralized on-chain trading behavior into a content stream akin to entertainment consumption through leaderboards, trading activity feeds, and copy-trading mechanisms. People become the new vessels of consensus.

For the vast number of retail investors lacking professional analytical skills, following a trader who has previously made millions of dollars in profit is obviously simpler than researching a newly born Meme project with no historical record.

However, this trend also signifies that the Meme market is entering a more intensely competitive stage. When trading volume and market attention are concentrated on a handful of top traders, competition between platforms naturally shifts from争夺ing users to争夺ing the "super nodes" that bring users – the Meme influencers.

This is extremely similar to the early battle for streamers in China's short-video live-streaming industry. Back then, platforms like Douyin, Kuaishou, Huya, and Douyu competed for top streamers with high signing fees, essentially competing for attention entry points. The difference is that the competition for top streamers in the short-video live-streaming industry occurred in a rapidly expanding emerging market, where user scale and commercial value were still in the growth phase, ultimately pushing the live-streaming industry toward maturity.

However, the emergence of a similar competitive model in the Meme market today reflects a completely different signal.

When platforms start competing for the same batch of "trading influencers," the winner might gain short-term growth, but it also means that the entire Meme track is losing the vitality originally formed by community culture and spontaneous propagation. For Memes, this is the greatest risk.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what are the specific terms of the incentive plan that Pump.fun allegedly offered to users from the FOMO platform?

AThe alleged incentive plan offers a one-time $20,000 signing bonus and a fixed monthly payment of $30,000. The conditions require users to: migrate their funds and trading positions from FOMO to Pump.fun; use a new, previously unused wallet as their dedicated Pump.fun wallet; link their X account to this wallet; publicly declare this wallet as their only public wallet on their X homepage; and permanently delete and close their FOMO platform account. They must also meet a monthly trading volume requirement of at least $25,000 on Pump.fun (or 25% of their average monthly volume on FOMO).

QWhat key platform features does the article credit for FOMO's rapid rise in the meme trading space?

AThe article credits FOMO's 'social-first' product design, specifically its Profit Leaderboard (Leaderboard) and its news feed (Feed) which provides alerts on the trading activities of top traders. These features leverage the 'money-worshipping' nature of the meme market, allowing the platform to 'create influencers' by highlighting high-profit users, giving them influence, and attracting followers who copy their trades.

QBased on DeFiLama and Dune data mentioned, how significant is FOMO's performance compared to established competitors?

AThe data shows FOMO's performance is highly significant. In the past 30 days, FOMO's revenue of $8.17 million has surpassed that of Uniswap, Phantom, and mainstream launchpads on Robinhood (like Flap and Pons). Its total fees have reached $30.39 million, with daily fees averaging over $200,000 since July and hitting a record high of $556,000 on August 6th. By August 8th, its market share in the Trading Bot sector had reached 43%, surpassing GMGN to become the market leader.

QWhat fundamental shift in the competitive landscape of the overseas meme market does the Pump.fun vs. FOMO rivalry signal, according to the article's analysis?

AThe rivalry signals a shift where the core of competition is no longer just about issuance tools, trading speed, or on-chain liquidity, but a battle for 'attention resources'—specifically, for influential meme traders/KOLs. The market has entered an 'influencer-driven model' or 'influencer livestream sales model' where platforms vie to sign the most influential traders who can attract users and generate trading volume through their followers and copy-trading.

QWhat potential long-term risk does the article associate with meme markets adopting this 'influencer-driven' competitive model?

AThe article suggests the long-term risk is that the meme market could lose the original vitality and spontaneous community-driven cultural consensus that initially fueled its growth. When competition focuses on a few 'super node' influencers, it may lead to market centralization and a loss of the organic, grassroots energy that is fundamental to the meme ecosystem's appeal and sustainability.

Leituras Relacionadas

$20k Signing Fee + $30k Monthly Salary: The Story Behind Pump.fun Poaching FOMO's Corner

The meme market has become increasingly fragmented, with a significant divide between overseas and Chinese users in terms of ecosystem and trading tools. Recently, a piece of gossip spread within overseas meme communities: Pump.fun, the largest token launch platform, is allegedly offering lucrative incentives to poach users from its competitor FOMO. According to a leaked agreement, eligible users are reportedly offered a one-time $20,000 signing bonus plus a $30,000 monthly salary to migrate their funds and trading activity exclusively to Pump.fun, close their FOMO accounts, and meet specific trading volume requirements. This aggressive move highlights FOMO's rapid rise. Launched just over a year ago, FOMO has secured $94 million in funding and, crucially, its revenue over the past 30 days has surpassed that of Uniswap and Phantom. Its market share in trading bots has even overtaken GMGN to become the leader. FOMO's success is attributed to its "social-first" product design, featuring a profit leaderboard and a feed tracking top traders' activities—effectively creating "trading celebrities" that users follow. In response, Pump.fun has recently upgraded its app to replicate these social features, shifting its homepage focus to trader activity feeds. The platform's founder has actively welcomed prominent meme traders. This competition underscores a major shift in the overseas meme market: the battleground has moved from launch tools and liquidity to a fight for attention and influence. The market is now dominated by a "网红带货模式" (influencer-driven model), where platforms compete to sign the most influential trading Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs), who have become the new carriers of market consensus. While this mirrors early competition in livestreaming platforms, it signals a potential risk for the meme space: losing the organic, community-driven vitality that originally fueled its growth, as competition centers increasingly on a concentrated group of trading influencers.

marsbitHá 1h

$20k Signing Fee + $30k Monthly Salary: The Story Behind Pump.fun Poaching FOMO's Corner

marsbitHá 1h

The Future Outlook of Bitcoin

Bitcoin: A Mid-2026 Perspective Bitcoin analyst Will Clemente assesses the asset's outlook, arguing that despite a challenging period, it now presents a compelling long-term value opportunity. The current bear market, while less severe in peak drawdown than 2022, has been difficult due to a lack of clear catalysts, underperformance versus assets like gold, and persistent ETF outflows. However, key negative pressures are showing signs of abating. Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs), a major source of sell pressure during the bull market, are slowing accumulation or shifting strategies. While quantum computing remains a long-term concern, its risk is likely significantly priced in at current levels. Fundamentally, the Bitcoin network remains decentralized and healthy, with a robust global node distribution. Although hash rate has declined as miners pivot to AI/HPC, the network's difficulty adjustment ensures security, and the resilience suggests a diverse, non-public mining base. Valuation metrics indicate Bitcoin is in deeply undervalued territory. It is consolidating near its 2021 highs, below the 200-week EMA, with weekly RSI showing a bullish divergence from oversold levels. The MVRV ratio is at historically low levels, signaling the market's aggregate cost basis is near the current price. Long-term holders have resumed accumulation, and trading volume across spot, ETF, and derivatives markets has dried up to multi-year lows. Implied volatility is cheap, and futures basis is compressed, reflecting a complete lack of speculative interest. The core bullish thesis hinges on seller exhaustion. After a year of selling from DATs and ETFs, and with quantum risks largely discounted, the pool of remaining motivated sellers appears limited. A potential catalyst could be steady, price-insensitive inflows from large institutions adding small strategic allocations to portfolios for diversification, given Bitcoin's recent low correlation with other assets. Conclusion: Bitcoin is considered "cheap" with most risks priced in. While a final leg down is possible, the network is healthy, and long-term holders are buying. Strategies include dollar-cost averaging, waiting for a definitive catalyst or price reversal, or entering a position now while using inexpensive options to hedge against further downside. The current setup suggests an interesting period ahead for the orange coin.

marsbitHá 2h

The Future Outlook of Bitcoin

marsbitHá 2h

Grayscale Clarifies Whether the Cryptocurrency Market Growth-Promoting Clarity Act Will Be Passed This Year

Zach Pandl, the Research Director at Grayscale, stated that the passage of the CLARITY Act—legislation aimed at establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for the crypto market in the U.S.—is unlikely to occur in Congress this year. According to Pandl, the Senate's tight schedule and the political climate in an election year make bipartisan agreement on the bill difficult. Pandl noted that the failure of the Clarity Act will not directly impact Bitcoin's role as a store of value, the operation of core blockchains, or the growth of stablecoin payments in the short term. The U.S. crypto sector has operated for nearly 17 years without such comprehensive market structure legislation. However, he warned that the absence of a clear regulatory framework could slow the influx of new investment and capital formation in the U.S. The proposed law aims to open new avenues for capital formation via blockchain, support the development of tokenized securities markets, and create a comprehensive oversight system for digital asset intermediaries, along with various consumer, investor, and software developer protections. Pandl believes federal regulators, particularly the SEC, will continue to fill regulatory gaps even without new legislation, issuing rules in areas like tokenized securities in the coming months. While significant progress has been made under the current administration regarding institutional custody, banking access, staking, and crypto ETPs, Pandl cautioned that without comprehensive market structure laws, much new investment and developer activity may shift outside the United States.

cryptonews.ruHá 3h

Grayscale Clarifies Whether the Cryptocurrency Market Growth-Promoting Clarity Act Will Be Passed This Year

cryptonews.ruHá 3h

Trading

Spot
活动图片