The Hottest Open Source Project in History, Almost Became a 'Trophy' in the Crypto World

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-04Última atualização em 2026-03-04

Resumo

OpenClaw has rapidly become one of the most popular and fastest-growing open-source projects in history, amassing over 250,000 stars on GitHub in just three months. Its creator, Peter Steinberger, has gained significant influence in the AI community but has also taken a strong stance against the crypto industry. Despite its success, OpenClaw has faced challenges, including a trademark dispute that led to a name change. During this process, crypto speculators quickly created and promoted fake tokens using the project’s name, leading to significant financial losses for some investors. Steinberger publicly denounced these activities, clarifying that OpenClaw would never issue a token and disavowing any association with cryptocurrency. The project also briefly listed Venice, a crypto-native AI project on Base chain, as a recommended model provider—a move that was quickly reversed to maintain neutrality and avoid perceived endorsements of crypto-related initiatives. Steinberger has repeatedly expressed frustration with crypto communities, citing harassment, malicious code submissions, and off-topic speculation as disruptive to genuine technical discussion. He has even considered abandoning the project due to these issues. Steinberger, who is financially independent, has advised young developers to avoid cryptocurrency, reflecting his broader criticism of the industry’s speculative culture. The conflict highlights the ongoing struggle between open-source innovation and crypto-dr...

Author: Nancy, PANews

A dark horse has emerged in the open-source world. In just three months, OpenClaw has become the most popular and fastest-growing open-source project in history, a new favorite among developers.

This intelligent agent tsunami, sparked by Peter Steinberger, has not only made him a top AI influencer but also won him a large number of "lobster believers" worldwide. This highly sought-after lobster godfather, however, strongly rejects the crypto world and has repeatedly publicly criticized it. Such a stance undoubtedly brings more negative舆论 to cryptocurrency.

Topping GitHub's Star Ranking, Urgently "Distancing" from Crypto Projects

There is no doubt that AI has become the golden narrative for capital and talent migration. Its rapid rise has led many to see AI as the hope for revitalizing the crypto industry, becoming a new opportunity for many in the circle to蹭流量 or seek investment.

Especially the recently trending OpenClaw. According to the latest data, OpenClaw's star count on the GitHub platform has exceeded 250,000, surpassing Linux and React to become one of the most popular open-source projects and setting the record for the fastest growth in open-source history.

As "raising lobsters" becomes popular globally, tutorials,变现 cases, and user experiences around OpenClaw continue to emerge. Some even make a profit by offering on-site OpenClaw installation services. From independent developers to large companies to offline services, the "shovel-selling" business for OpenClaw is booming.

The crypto market naturally wouldn't miss this hotspot. Recently, Venice, an AI project on the Base chain, became a recommended model provider for OpenClaw, and the only crypto-native project. With the加持 of the top AI project's popularity, the Venice token surged, its market cap once exceeding $900 million. This news quickly caught the attention of crypto industry practitioners and was widely shared.

It is reported that Venice is a generative AI project focused on privacy protection and content censorship resistance. Its底层 integrates various open-source large models and was founded in 2024 by crypto OG and ShapeShift founder Erik Voorhees. It has recently gained attention due to the Agent privacy trend.

However, Steinberger clearly did not agree with this kind of捆绑炒作. He immediately publicly clarified, "This was an oversight in a previous document. We want to remain neutral on this matter." Simultaneously, OpenClaw promptly deleted the related recommendation content.

In other words, OpenClaw's "distancing" this time is not否定 or贬低ing the actual value and technical advantages of the Venice project, but rather proactively deleting the "official key recommendation" label that could lead to over-interpretation, to avoid unnecessary narrative绑架 and利益猜测. Especially as an open-source Agent framework, and with the founder having joined OpenAI, OpenClaw needs to maintain technical neutrality and avoid any suspicion of利益冲突.

Choosing to Sever Ties Due to Crypto "Piggybacking," Once Considered Abandoning the Project

Unlike AI leaders like OpenAI founder Sam Altman and xAI co-founder Musk, who hold positive or even open attitudes towards crypto, Steinberger adopts a stance of "fans only, no disturbances." This attitude of avoidance inevitably leaves the币圈 feeling "破防" (disheartened/offended).

In fact, Steinberger, who is not interested in crypto, is very排斥 the "piggybacking" phenomenon in the crypto circle. Since last year, he has issued dozens of public statements expressing strong dissatisfaction with crypto speculation culture, even直言 (stating bluntly) "don't come near."

Especially after OpenClaw became popular. In January of this year, OpenClaw's popularity rose, but its original name, Clawdbot, encountered a trademark dispute with Anthropic's AI model Claude and received a cease-and-desist notice from their legal team. Subsequently, Steinberger renamed the project twice,最终 settling on the name OpenClaw.

However, this renaming风波 was exploited by crypto speculators for抢注 (domain squatting) and炒作.

During the renaming process, snipers used automated scripts to quickly hijack accounts, impersonate the official team, and趁机 issue fake tokens, such as CLAWD. The market cap of some of these tokens once soared to tens of millions of dollars, attracting a large number of investors.

Faced with market speculation, Steinberger quickly publicly stated that he would never issue a token and emphasized that any project issuing tokens in his name is a scam. This caused the prices of these tokens to plummet, resulting in significant losses for many retail investors.

If this crypto闹剧 (farce) only made Steinberger反感 (disgusted), then the damage to the community ecology made him愤怒 (angry).

As OpenClaw continued to gain popularity, a large number of crypto players flooded into related communities, with some radicals even maliciously submitting code, sending abusive private messages, demanding Steinberger claim transaction fees or crypto-fy the project.

As a result, the official OpenClaw Discord server began completely banning mentions of keywords like Bitcoin, Crypto, etc., even neutral technical discussions were not exempt. Some users were removed for quoting Bitcoin block heights as benchmark tests.

"I underestimated these people," Steinberger said bluntly in a recent interview, pointing out that the crypto community is a very particular subculture that quickly tokenizes any hot topic. But he had already achieved financial freedom economically and simply did not want to support this (crypto) thing. The crypto noise made it almost impossible for him to see any real project discussion; the related speculative炒作 was harming the project.

It was precisely because of the "harassment" from the crypto community that this天才开发者 (genius developer) admitted he had even briefly considered abandoning the entire project. He very much did not want the project to become a tool for crypto speculation.

Just recently, Steinberger also publicly advised young people, "Don't waste your time on cryptocurrency." These remarks further exposed his dissatisfaction with the crypto industry.

This unexpected clash between the open-source world and the币圈 is not just a act of "self-preservation" by a hit project; it更折射出 (reflects even more) the difficult-to-reconcile矛盾 (contradiction) between technical purity and capital炒作 (hype/speculation) in the current AI wave.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is OpenClaw and why is it considered a breakthrough in the open-source community?

AOpenClaw is an open-source project that became the most popular and fastest-growing in history, gaining over 250,000 stars on GitHub in just three months. It is an AI agent framework that has attracted widespread attention from developers and is seen as a new favorite in the AI space due to its rapid growth and innovative approach.

QWho is Peter Steinberger and what is his stance on cryptocurrency?

APeter Steinberger is the creator of OpenClaw and a prominent figure in AI. He strongly opposes cryptocurrency, publicly criticizing it multiple times and expressing frustration with crypto communities for 'harassing' his project, issuing fake tokens, and disrupting discussions. He has stated that he will never issue a token and advises young people wasting time on crypto.

QWhy did OpenClaw remove its recommendation for the Venice project?

AOpenClaw removed its recommendation for Venice, a crypto-native AI project on the Base chain, to maintain a neutral stance and avoid any perception of endorsement or利益冲突. Steinberger clarified that the initial inclusion was an oversight and that OpenClaw wanted to remain impartial, especially as an open-source framework, to prevent narrative hijacking and speculative interest.

QHow did the cryptocurrency community react to OpenClaw's popularity, and what were the consequences?

AThe cryptocurrency community engaged in speculative activities, including creating fake tokens like CLAWD with millions in market cap, flooding discussions with crypto-related content, and even sending abusive messages. This led OpenClaw to ban crypto-related terms on its Discord and caused Steinberger to consider abandoning the project due to the harm from炒作 and harassment.

QWhat challenges did OpenClaw face regarding its name, and how was it resolved?

AOpenClaw faced a trademark dispute with Anthropic's AI model Claude, originally named Clawdbot, and received a cease-and-desist letter. After two name changes, it settled on OpenClaw. During this process, crypto opportunists quickly registered similar names and issued counterfeit tokens, prompting Steinberger to publicly denounce them as scams.

Leituras Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHá 14m

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHá 14m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHá 22m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHá 22m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Há 24m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Há 24m

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

The article discusses Bitcoin's recent price movement above $66,000 and a shift in market analysis from focusing on a local bottom to a potential macro-cycle bottom. It cites a crypto analyst noting that BTC has flashed three historical technical signals that previously coincided with major market bottoms in 2015, 2019, and 2022, suggesting the current zone could be a strong long-term accumulation area. However, the article also highlights a significant challenge: despite the price breakout, on-chain data shows a lack of supporting liquidity. Stablecoin dominance is rising while the total stablecoin market cap is shrinking, with capital continuing to leave exchanges. This divergence indicates that while the technical setup is bullish, the rally may struggle to sustain enough momentum for a decisive move into the $70,000 region without an influx of fresh capital.

ambcryptoHá 26m

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

ambcryptoHá 26m

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Há 40m

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Há 40m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow