The Hottest 00s Generation on Wall Street

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-31Última atualização em 2026-05-31

Resumo

"Wall Street's Hottest '00s Phenom: The 25-Year-Old Fund Manager Who Bet on AI's 'Boring' Backbone" At just 25, Leopold Aschenbrenner, once fired by OpenAI, now runs a hedge fund worth $13.7 billion. His strategy? Betting against the consensus. While others chased AI chips, he invested early in the physical infrastructure powering the AI boom: electricity, data centers, and energy. Expelled from OpenAI's safety team in 2024, Aschenbrenner foresaw the coming bottleneck. He argued that AI progress would be limited not by algorithms, but by power, chip capacity, and space. Acting on this, he founded Situational Awareness LP to go long on these "old economy" assets. His bets have paid off spectacularly. His fund's assets soared from $255 million in late 2024 to $13.7 billion by Q1 2026. His portfolio is a direct reflection of his thesis: major long positions in fuel cell company Bloom Energy and data center/bitcoin mining firms like CleanSpark and Riot Platforms, which control critical land and power resources. Conversely, he holds massive put options against overheated semiconductor giants like NVIDIA and AMD. A notable exception was his bullish bet on storage company SanDisk, which surged ~160% in Q2. Aschenbrenner's vision is materializing. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta are ramping up colossal capital expenditure on data centers. Global data center power consumption is projected to skyrocket, with AI accounting for over half by 2030. The demand for enabling t...

"I was early, but I wasn't wrong."

The protagonist in the movie "The Big Short" would surely resonate deeply with these words, much like the youngest hedge fund manager on Wall Street today.

In 2024, a notice from OpenAI sent 23-year-old Leopold Aschenbrenner packing. Soon after, he turned around and founded a hedge fund, positioning himself against the prevailing consensus—he didn't go all-in on the then-sizzling hot AI chips and semiconductors, but instead went long on electricity, data centers, computing power infrastructure, and energy infrastructure. These were seen as slow, clunky "old-school" assets at the time.

His early calculation soon proved prophetic. Today, tech giants are pouring huge investments into AI infrastructure, and the capital markets have enthusiastically crowned new AI kings in areas like storage and optical modules. Leopold won. His fund's portfolio value had already reached $13.7 billion (approx. RMB 90 billion) by the end of Q1 this year, and his personal wealth has skyrocketed.

And he's only 25. In the AI era, the genius narrative is simply too compelling.

Graduated from University at 19

Fired by OpenAI Two Years Ago

His youth shouldn't be too surprising, considering he started university at 15.

This German teenager from a family of doctors showed exceptional academic talent. In 2021, at age 19, Leopold earned three degrees in Mathematics, Statistics, and Economics, graduating as the valedictorian from Columbia University, and subsequently worked at two funds.

Not long after, he joined OpenAI's Superalignment team. This was a star-studded team, co-led by OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, with the goal of solving the superintelligence alignment problem within four years—essentially ensuring highly intelligent AI remains under human control.

The drama came when Leopold was very publicly fired by OpenAI.

The trigger was an internal memo written by the OpenAI board warning of insufficient safety measures at the company. This memo, however, sparked tensions between management and the board. In April 2024, OpenAI dismissed Leopold, citing information leaks.

Experiences shape choices and hone foresight.

Shortly after being fired, Leopold published a profound, lengthy essay that almost predicted the current direction of AI development and investment trends. In it, he mentioned that by 2027, large models would be capable of doing the work of AI researchers or engineers.

To achieve this, the key constraints wouldn't be at the algorithmic level, but in electricity, chip manufacturing capacity, and physical space. The power consumption of a single training cluster would leap from megawatt scale to gigawatt scale, approaching the output of a large nuclear power plant.

Based on this prediction, at the end of 2024, Leopold chose to start a business—founding the hedge fund Situational Awareness LP, dedicating himself to going long on the energy and computing power infrastructure needed for AI development, while avoiding the crowded bubbles in chips and the application layer.

Shorting Nvidia

But Buying Into the High-Flier SanDisk

Thus, Wall Street's new genius trader was born.

In May 2026, as Leopold's hedge fund disclosed its latest U.S. stock holdings (13F filing) for the first quarter of the year, the astonishing expansion of this 00s-generation manager's wealth came into view:

The total market value of his portfolio had skyrocketed from $5.52 billion at the end of 2025 to $13.7 billion. At the end of 2024, the fund's size was merely $255 million. This speed is nothing short of meteoric.

Beyond his resume and genius stories, global onlookers were more interested in what he bought.

Looking at his latest holdings, Leopold maintained his long positions in AI infrastructure while establishing new short option positions worth $8.45 billion as a hedge against tech and semiconductors. As of the end of Q1, his top five holdings were all put options. These included put options on the VanEck Semiconductor ETF valued at around $2 billion, put options on Nvidia valued at around $1.6 billion, as well as put options on Oracle, Broadcom, and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

This portfolio clearly signaled wariness towards overheated chip stocks. An exception was that by the end of Q1, he had exclusively increased his holdings of SanDisk by 86,000 shares and established call options on SanDisk worth $390 million. SanDisk's subsequent performance undoubtedly became the envy of many; since the start of Q2 alone, SanDisk has risen approximately 160%.

The main action was on the long side, where Leopold heavily invested in critical infrastructure assets for the AGI era.

His top long holding was the fuel cell company Bloom Energy. Leopold holds nearly 6.5 million shares of the company, with a position value of about $879 million. More precisely, Bloom Energy makes fuel cells, which can efficiently convert natural gas directly into electricity.

Simultaneously, in Q1, Leopold also increased his holdings in companies like CleanSpark, Riot Platforms, Applied Digital, and IREN—firms involved in data centers or crypto mining, possessing land, power resources, data center capabilities, or grid permits.

"The speed of AI development is determined by physical bottlenecks, so you should invest in the bottlenecks themselves." Looking across these trades, they precisely correspond to the underlying logic Leopold had when founding the fund.

Of course, for ordinary investors, copying these moves comes a bit late. Holdings reports typically have a 45-day delay, and by the time the public sees what the big players have bought, the most lucrative part of the rally has often already passed.

The End Point of the AI World

"The whole world is starting to value AI infrastructure assets."

In just the past few months of this year, the sectors Leopold bet on—power supply, data center computing power, semiconductor optics—have fully demonstrated their potential and immense demand.

Take electricity, for example. IEA data shows that in 2025, global data centers consumed 485 TWh of electricity, with AI accounting for 170 TWh (35%). It's projected that by 2030, total global data center electricity consumption will reach 950 TWh, with AI consuming 510 TWh (54%), exceeding Japan's total national electricity consumption. China's figures are equally staggering: in 2025, AI electricity consumption reached 450 billion kWh (3.8% of total societal electricity use), and it's expected to reach 600 billion kWh (5%) in 2026, nearly matching the annual electricity consumption of China's entire steel industry.

Then look at "light." As AI competition rapidly evolves from a battle of computing power to one of connectivity, traditional copper wire connections are long overburdened, leading to explosive growth in demand for "optical links."

According to data from UK-based commodity research firm CRU, global data center fiber optic cable usage reached 69.6 million core kilometers in 2025 and is expected to exceed 100 million core kilometers in 2026. Their estimates suggest that by 2027, AI-driven fiber demand will account for 35% of total data center fiber demand. For optical modules, Goldman Sachs has significantly raised its 2026 sales forecast for 800G optical modules from an initial 25 million units to 33.5 million units, a 58% increase.

Unsurprisingly, tech giants have already begun building their AI infrastructure moats.

In 2026, capital expenditure plans from Amazon, Alphabet (Google's parent), Meta, and others have grown substantially, with massive funds directed towards building new data centers and a long list of equipment including AI chips, network cables, and backup generators. Domestically, the latest development is rumors that ByteDance is discussing a spending plan of up to $70 billion (approx. RMB 474.7 billion) this year, primarily for building data centers and other AI infrastructure.

This wave of AI infrastructure frenzy is even more directly and violently reflected in the capital markets.

Looking domestically, the "Yi-Zhong-Tian" trio of optical module giants have seen their stock prices double since last year, especially InnoLight Technology, which soared from a low of 66 yuan per share in April last year to over 1,000 yuan, with a market cap now nearing 1.3 trillion yuan.

Similarly, since the memory cycle rally began in the second half of last year, stocks like Longsys, Deming Li, and Biwin Storage have surged in sync. Dapu Micro, which just went public in April, multiplied its IPO price nearly 20-fold in just one month.

In contrast, one can't help but reflect: the internet was once imagined as a weightless world, yet it gave rise to server rooms, fiber optic cables, and undersea cables. Now AI might seem even lighter, but when it comes to actual implementation, it equally relies on electricity, land, chips, networks, and cooling systems.

A grand future always grows from those silent assets.

This article is from the WeChat public account "Investment Community" (ID: pedaily2012), author: Feng Yuchen

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the core investment thesis behind Leopold Aschenbrenner's hedge fund, Situational Awareness LP, when he founded it?

AThe core investment thesis was to go long on the physical infrastructure necessary for AI development—such as power, data centers, compute capacity, and energy infrastructure—while avoiding the crowded and potentially overvalued bets on AI chips and semiconductors. He believed that the speed of AI advancement would be limited by these physical bottlenecks, so investors should own the bottlenecks themselves.

QWhat major positions did Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund hold in Q1 2026 according to the 13F filing, and what did they indicate about his market view?

AIn Q1 2026, his fund's largest holdings were put options (bearish bets), primarily on semiconductor and tech companies like the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, NVIDIA, Oracle, Broadcom, and AMD, indicating a strong caution towards overheated valuations in the chip sector. Conversely, he held significant long positions in companies like Bloom Energy (fuel cells), CleanSpark, and other data center/crypto mining firms with energy and infrastructure assets, reflecting his bullish thesis on AI infrastructure.

QWhy was Leopold Aschenbrenner fired from OpenAI, and how did that experience influence his subsequent career path?

AHe was fired from OpenAI in 2024 for allegedly leaking an internal memorandum where the board warned of insufficient safety measures, which heightened tensions between management and the board. This experience, coupled with his work on superintelligence alignment, helped shape his foresight. He later published an essay predicting AI's physical infrastructure needs, which directly led him to found a hedge fund focused on investing in that very sector.

QWhat does the article suggest are the key physical constraints on the rapid development of AI, based on data cited?

AThe article identifies electricity/power and optical connectivity ('light') as key physical constraints. It cites IEA data showing AI's massive and growing share of global data center electricity consumption. It also references forecasts for surging demand in fiber optics and optical modules within data centers, driven by AI's need for high-speed connections that copper wires cannot support.

QAccording to the article, how have capital markets and tech giants responded to the growing demand for AI infrastructure?

ACapital markets have responded by dramatically driving up the stock prices of companies in relevant sectors, such as Chinese optical module manufacturers ('Yizhongtian') and memory chip makers, with some seeing multi-fold increases. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and reportedly ByteDance are making massive capital expenditure plans, significantly increasing investments in building new data centers and purchasing related equipment like AI chips and network cables to secure their AI infrastructure moats.

Leituras Relacionadas

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbitHá 42m

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbitHá 42m

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbitHá 48m

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbitHá 48m

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbitHá 48m

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbitHá 48m

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报Há 57m

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报Há 57m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片