The First to Ride the Hype of Robinhood Chain: Arbitrum, Up Nearly 20%

marsbitPublicado em 2026-07-11Última atualização em 2026-07-11

Resumo

ARB rose nearly 20% recently, becoming one of the top-performing major L2 tokens. The catalyst was the launch of Robinhood Chain, an RWA-focused Layer 2 built on Arbitrum's Orbit tech. A key driver is the revived "Arbitrum Expansion Program" (AEP), a revenue-sharing rule from 2024 requiring independent Orbit chains to give 10% of their net protocol revenue to the Arbitrum ecosystem. While smaller chains already paid this, Robinhood Chain, with its significant TradFi backing, is the first large-scale tenant to make the mechanism economically meaningful. Despite impressive early metrics (over 35k addresses, $2.5B TVL, $1B+ DEX volume in its first week), Robinhood Chain's current contribution to Arbitrum's treasury is minor (~$14.7k net revenue). The price surge reflects a narrative-driven premium on AEP's future potential, given Robinhood's vast off-chain assets. The situation mirrors Optimism's "landlord" model with OP Stack, which is now facing a decline as its major tenant, Base, plans to leave. Similarly, analysts question if the high-earning Robinhood Chain will eventually follow Base's path and seek independence from Arbitrum's tech stack, especially as its activity already benefits Ethereum more directly through ETH fee burns.

Author:angelilu, Foresight News

ARB hit $0.094 intraday today, up nearly 20% in the past week, making it one of the best-performing mainstream L2 tokens over that period.

The catalyst for this rally is the launch of "Robinhood Chain"—Robinhood's RWA (Real World Asset) Layer2 built on Arbitrum technology, which officially went live on mainnet at a launch event in London on July 1.

A more subtle logic behind this is that a year-and-a-half-old rule has been brought back into the spotlight: A portion of Robinhood Chain's revenue will automatically flow back into the Arbitrum ecosystem, with a significant chunk going directly to the ArbitrumDAO treasury. This isn't a new policy, but a previously lukewarm revenue-sharing mechanism that is now being seriously priced in by the market for the first time, thanks to the entry of the heavyweight TradFi brand Robinhood.

The First Major Tenant in a Year and a Half

This rule is called the Arbitrum Expansion Program (AEP), launched jointly by the Arbitrum Foundation and Offchain Labs in January 2024. Simply put, it allows Arbitrum to open up its technology for others to build their own chains, with the condition of revenue sharing.

The sharing logic is straightforward: Any independent chain built using Arbitrum Orbit technology but not settling on Arbitrum One/Nova (e.g., settling directly to Ethereum or Base) must share 10% of its net protocol revenue with the Arbitrum ecosystem—8% to the DAO treasury and 2% to the Developer Guild. However, L3s that settle back to Arbitrum One/Nova, like Xai and Sanko, are exempt from this share and retain their status as first-tier ecosystem members.

The key point is that Robinhood Chain is not the first chain to trigger the AEP. Smaller chains settling on Base, like Degen Chain, Onyx, and Flynet, have been paying this share for a while, but their volumes were too small to draw attention. What sets Robinhood Chain apart is simply that it's the first heavyweight chain to bring scale to this shared revenue amount.

Impressive Data, but the Rent Plate is Still Small

According to the latest data disclosed by Johann, Robinhood's Head of International & Crypto Business: As of July 10, just over a week after launch, Robinhood Chain has processed over 17 million transactions, has over 350,000 addresses, a TVL of approximately $250 million, and DEX trading volume exceeding $1 billion. For a newly launched chain, this report card is indeed impressive.

But the rent plate is far from this large. According to Dune data, as of the time of writing, Robinhood Chain's current protocol revenue is about $147,000. After deducting the cost of data settlement back to Ethereum L1, it's only $146,000. Even if 10% of this is shared with Arbitrum DAO, the amount is pitifully small. ARB's current rally reflects the market's premium valuation on the future scaling boundaries of the AEP protocol—a typical narrative-driven market move.

Looking at the potential upside, the ceiling for AEP is indeed not low: The Robinhood platform holds total assets of approximately $324 billion, custodies assets of about $143.6 billion, and its tokenized stocks have expanded to over 2,000 tokens covering 120 countries—most of these assets are not yet on-chain today. Once settlement gradually migrates, the $57,000 sharing base will stand at a completely different scale.

Old Landlord About to Lose Biggest Tenant, New Landlord Just Landed a Big Deal

Arbitrum's "rent collection" model isn't actually new. Optimism has been running the "landlord" business for a long time.

The Optimism Collective collects rent from all Superchain member chains (Base, Zora, Mode, Unichain, etc.) through OP Stack—charging 2.5% of sequencer revenue or 15% of net profit (whichever is higher), and OP Mainnet itself also contributes its net revenue to the treasury. However, its rental income has been gradually shrinking, falling further to about $2.9 million in Q1 2026 (with Base alone contributing about $1.4 million), down 21.5% quarter-on-quarter from $3.7 million in the previous quarter.

In February of this year, Base officially announced plans to leave OP Stack—Base accounted for about 96.5% of revenue flowing into the Collective on a gas fee basis. Upon the news, the OP token fell 28% within two days.

Meanwhile, Arbitrum just managed to revitalize its own landlord business from zero, thanks to Robinhood Chain. Their structures are completely parallel—both are underlying technologies charging rent from external chains, with the money going into their own DAO treasuries (ArbitrumDAO vs. Optimism Collective). The only difference is that Arbitrum's AEP, although the rules were written in 2024, never had a major tenant until this week, finally giving its "rent collection" a sense of scale for the first time.

But Can This Big Tenant Be Kept?

It's precisely this history with Base that some analysts are using to throw cold water. Some believe that, following the same script, Robinhood Chain will eventually leave Arbitrum Orbit just as Base left OP Stack and align directly with Ethereum. According to growthepie data, Robinhood Chain's daily sequencer revenue is already nearly $60,000, second only to Base's $72,000 among Ethereum L2s, approaching three times that of its parent chain, Arbitrum.

Even more delicate is the question of the beneficiary. In its first week, Robinhood Chain has become the second-largest demand source for Ethereum DA after Base, with its sequencer paying blob fees, settling in ETH, and permanently burning it. Some analysts argue that if this chain can only have one ecosystem currency, it's more likely to be ETH than ARB.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the primary reason behind Arbitrum (ARB) token's recent price surge of nearly 20% according to the article?

AThe primary reason is the launch of 'Robinhood Chain,' a Layer 2 for Real World Assets (RWA) built by Robinhood using Arbitrum technology. This event brought significant market attention to Arbitrum's revenue-sharing model for the first time.

QWhat is the name of Arbitrum's program that mandates revenue sharing from chains built with its technology, and what are the specific terms?

AThe program is called the Arbitrum Expansion Plan (AEP). It requires independent chains built with Arbitrum Orbit technology, which do not settle back to Arbitrum One/Nova (e.g., those settling directly to Ethereum or Base), to share 10% of their net protocol revenue with the Arbitrum ecosystem (8% to the DAO Treasury, 2% to the Developer Guild).

QWhy is Robinhood Chain's launch significant for Arbitrum's revenue-sharing model, unlike previous users of the AEP like Degen Chain?

AWhile other small chains like Degen Chain have been paying under AEP, their volume was too insignificant to matter. Robinhood Chain is significant because it is the first major, heavyweight chain from a major TradFi brand to trigger the AEP, bringing substantial potential scale and market credibility to the revenue-sharing model.

QWhat historical event from the Optimism ecosystem is cited as a cautionary tale regarding the sustainability of such revenue-sharing models?

AThe article cites Base's announcement in February (2026) to break away from the OP Stack as a cautionary tale. Base was the largest contributor (providing ~96.5% of revenue) to the Optimism Collective's treasury, and its departure caused the OP token price to drop 28% over two days.

QAccording to analysts in the article, what are the potential risks that Robinhood Chain might pose to Arbitrum's long-term benefits from the AEP?

AAnalysts suggest Robinhood Chain might eventually follow Base's example and break away from Arbitrum Orbit to align directly with Ethereum, especially as its sequencer revenue grows rapidly. Furthermore, the chain's economic activity primarily benefits Ethereum (ETH) through blob fee payments and burning, not necessarily the ARB token.

Leituras Relacionadas

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbitHá 40m

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbitHá 40m

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

The United States is preparing to demand that European and other partners abandon Chinese artificial intelligence initiatives, threatening exclusion from the American-led "Pax Silica" coalition, according to a leaked U.S. State Department document. This ultimatum forces signatories of the "AI Opportunity Statement" to choose between the Western technological ecosystem and alternative frameworks, with China not explicitly named but clearly targeted. Pax Silica is a U.S. strategy for AI and semiconductor hegemony, launched in late 2025. Its European presence expanded significantly in mid-2026. Concurrently, China, Russia, and 27 other nations established the World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in July 2026 as an independent intergovernmental platform promoting AI governance based on UN principles. This situation creates a difficult choice, especially for European nations balancing strategic autonomy with dependence on U.S. tech and security. It also pressures Global South countries with pragmatic ties to both Washington and Beijing. The formation of competing blocks risks fragmenting the global tech landscape, forcing companies to split supply chains, increasing costs, and potentially leading to incompatible standards and protocols. The era of open globalization in AI may be ending, replaced by geopolitical confrontation where technological sovereignty trumps economic efficiency. The decisions made will shape the global digital economy for decades.

cryptonews.ruHá 2h

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

cryptonews.ruHá 2h

Robert Kiyosaki Shares His Mentor's Predictions About the Emergence of Bitcoin and AI

American entrepreneur and author of "Rich Dad Poor Dad," Robert Kiyosaki, discussed the influence of futurist R. Buckminster Fuller on his worldview, linking Fuller's past technological predictions to the emergence of Bitcoin and the development of artificial intelligence. In an X post, Kiyosaki also reflected on personal purpose, sharing his journey from the music business—where he worked with bands like The Police and Iron Maiden—to creating the "Cashflow" board game and writing his famous book. He described feeling an inner emptiness despite his success, a turning point that came after meeting Fuller, whom he studied with for three summers. Kiyosaki described Fuller as a "friendly genius" who foresaw world-changing developments like Bitcoin and AI. However, the core of his post focused on Fuller's philosophical impact, particularly a quote about belonging to the universe and finding purpose by dedicating one's life to the maximum benefit of others. The entrepreneur remains a vocal advocate for cryptocurrencies. He regularly advises buying Bitcoin during market panics, viewing it and assets like Ethereum, gold, and silver as hedges against traditional financial system failures. Kiyosaki has predicted a major market crash by 2026, seeing it as an opportunity for prepared investors, with long-term price targets including $750,000 for Bitcoin and $95,000 for Ethereum.

cryptonews.ruHá 4h

Robert Kiyosaki Shares His Mentor's Predictions About the Emergence of Bitcoin and AI

cryptonews.ruHá 4h

Etherealize CEO Calls Wall Street's Private Blockchains a 'Race to the Bottom'

Etherealize co-founder and CEO Vivek Raman criticized Wall Street's growing interest in private, permissioned blockchains, calling them a "race to the bottom." In an interview with CoinDesk, Raman argued that consortium networks fragment liquidity and return the industry to the siloed systems that blockchain technology was meant to overcome. He stated that closed networks do not interoperate, undermining two key advantages of the technology: system compatibility and liquidity concentration. Etherealize promotes Ethereum as an open, foundational layer for institutional players. Raman insists that privacy and access restrictions should be built on top of public infrastructure—at the application or L2 level—rather than creating separate, closed networks. He compared Ethereum to HTTP as a base layer, with additional permissioned and private layers akin to HTTPS. Examples of this new wave of "closed" solutions mentioned include Canton Network from Digital Asset, Circle's Arc project, and Stripe's Tempo. Raman termed this trend "consortium chains 2.0," recalling earlier initiatives like the R3 interbank consortium and the Hyperledger corporate ecosystem from 2016 that failed to gain significant traction. He reiterated his firm belief that a global, open, permissionless infrastructure is necessary as a foundational base layer. Raman previously noted in June that traditional financial institutions had begun implementing Ethereum-based solutions into real business processes.

cryptonews.ruHá 4h

Etherealize CEO Calls Wall Street's Private Blockchains a 'Race to the Bottom'

cryptonews.ruHá 4h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar HYPE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Hyperliquid (HYPE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Hyperliquid (HYPE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Hyperliquid (HYPE)Depois de comprar o teu Hyperliquid (HYPE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Hyperliquid (HYPE)Transaciona facilmente Hyperliquid (HYPE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

537 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar HYPE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de HYPE (HYPE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片