The FBI Launched a Coin, and It's More Legitimate Than Half of the Crypto Projects Out There

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-21Última atualização em 2026-05-21

Resumo

In an undercover operation dubbed "Operation Token Mirrors," the FBI created a fake cryptocurrency project called NexFundAI on Ethereum to expose widespread market manipulation. Posing as a project team, FBI agents approached several market-making firms—including Gotbit, ZM Quant, CLS Global, and MyTrade—to artificially inflate trading volume. All firms agreed without questioning the project's legitimacy, with one founder admitting on tape that they profited by ensuring retail investors lost money. The investigation, spanning two years and three continents, led to charges against 28 individuals and the seizure of over $25 million in crypto assets. Key cases involved firms like Saitama, which allegedly manipulated its token to a $7.5 billion market cap using coordinated buying and market makers, and Lillian Finance, which promoted a fraudulent charity narrative. Evidence included internal spreadsheets tracking fake versus real trading volume and Telegram chats discussing manipulation tactics. The FBI's fake project website now warns visitors about its investigative purpose and offers a victim compensation portal. Ironically, within 24 hours of the DOJ's announcement, a copycat token based on NexFundAI's contract was launched, netting its creator over $127,000—highlighting how quickly such schemes are replicated in the crypto space.

Author: Curry, Shenchao TechFlow

Two years ago, FBI agents pretended to be the founding team of an investment project at the "intersection of AI and finance," launched a token called NexFundAI on Ethereum, complete with an official website, whitepaper, and business plan, looking no different from any legitimate project on the market.

Then they approached market makers to provide liquidity.

One function of market makers is sometimes to help project teams boost trading volume. The industry term is "volume support," which translates to volume manipulation.

The undercover FBI agents contacted several well-known market makers in the industry one by one, stating upfront: we have a new project and need someone to help boost the trading volume.

According to the indictment released by the U.S. Department of Justice, every single one said, okay.

No one asked if the project was compliant, no one asked if the token had any real utility, no one asked if this was illegal. According to court documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice, four market makers—Gotbit, ZM Quant, CLS Global, MyTrade—all took the job.

During a meeting with an undercover agent, the founder of one of these firms, on a recording device, referred to himself as the "mastermind." He explained in detail how his company used bots to simultaneously place buy and sell orders to create fake trading volume, and how to make the price chart look like a rollercoaster to lure retail investors to jump in.

Then he said something that the FBI recorded verbatim. According to Cointelegraph quoting the indictment, he said:

We have to make them lose money for us to make money.

"Them" refers to retail investors.

The operation was code-named Operation Token Mirrors. According to a U.S. Department of Justice announcement on October 9, 2024, the first batch of 18 people were charged, with over $25 million in crypto assets seized. According to an IRS announcement on March 30 of this year, a second batch of 10 people were charged, with three extradited to the U.S. from Singapore.

Two years, three continents, 28 people. This is the largest market manipulation enforcement action in cryptocurrency history. And it's not over yet.

A Price Quote

How did these market makers operate?

According to the indictment released by the U.S. Department of Justice, Gotbit's founder, Andriunin, maintained a spreadsheet within the company with two columns of data side by side: one labeled "Created Volume" and the other "Market Volume."

To translate, one column was the fake volume they generated themselves, the other was the actual trading happening in the market.

In a 2019 interview with CoinDesk, while still a sophomore at Moscow State University, this 20-year-old was already explaining in detail on camera how he wrote code to create fake volume and helped clients get their tokens onto CoinMarketCap's trending lists. According to the CoinDesk article, he himself said this business was "not entirely ethical."

After the interview aired, he didn't receive any subpoenas; instead, he gained five new clients.

By the time of his arrest in 2024, Gotbit had been operating for six years, serving projects worldwide. According to the U.S. Department of Justice's sentencing announcement, Andriunin was ultimately sentenced to 8 months in prison, Gotbit was ordered to dissolve, and approximately $23 million in crypto assets were forfeited.

Gotbit wasn't the cheapest.

According to a price quote from another market maker disclosed in the indictment, the cost of generating $1 million in daily trading volume was about $200. According to Cointelegraph citing court documents, an employee of ZM Quant explained to an FBI undercover agent on a recorded call: "We use one to two thousand wallets, trading ten times per hour, or ten times per minute, to reach the target volume."

Each transaction cost about $3.

And CLS Global went even further. According to SEC investigation documents, this company registered in the UAE used 30 wallets to execute 740 wash trades, creating nearly $600,000 in fake trading volume, accounting for 98% of the total trading volume of the fake token NexFundAI created by the FBI during that period.

$7.5 Billion of Thin Air

Market makers are tools; the people hiring them are the main actors.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice indictment, the biggest client exposed by this FBI sting operation was called Saitama, a crypto company registered in Massachusetts in 2021, with a peak market cap reportedly reaching $7.5 billion.

What does $7.5 billion mean? It was larger than many legitimate publicly traded companies on Nasdaq at the time.

But how did that number come about, according to the indictment? Starting in July 2021, Saitama's management coordinated actions in a Telegram group, using multiple wallets to place small buy orders, creating the illusion of "a large influx of new buyers."

According to Telegram chat logs cited in the indictment, a core member explained the purpose of the operation: "We want these small buys to look like more buyers, that’s the plan."

The chat logs also included "PUMP IT" emojis and GIFs they sent to each other to confirm buys and celebrate when retail investors followed.

According to the same indictment, Saitama then paid market makers including ZM Quant and Gotbit to conduct large-scale wash trading on exchanges like BitMart and LBank. After the market cap was inflated, the management quietly sold their own tokens, cashing out tens of millions of dollars. According to a DOJ announcement, Saitama's CEO was arrested in the UK, and five former and current employees were charged, with three pleading guilty.

Saitama wasn't the only one.

According to the same indictment, a project called Lillian Finance was founded by 48-year-old Bradley Beatty from Florida. This person publicly claimed to be a defense contractor, stated he had spoken before Congress on cryptocurrency issues, and promised that part of the token sale proceeds would go to charity to help children receive medical care.

According to the indictment, all these claims were fabricated. Beatty pocketed the profits meant for charity.

Defense contractor, congressional speech, children's medical charity—you just need to weave a compelling enough narrative and hire a market maker to paint a pretty price chart, and that's enough to attract some people to FOMO.

Looking back at these cases, what feels most unsettling isn't how sophisticated the scams were, but rather, how crude they were.

The FBI's Coin Was Pretty Legit

After the operation concluded, the FBI did one more thing.

According to a U.S. Department of Justice announcement, the NexFundAI website is still up, but now with a banner at the top that reads: "This website was created under the direction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation as part of an investigation into cryptocurrency fraud and market manipulation." Below the banner is a link to the full DOJ indictment.

The FBI also specifically opened a victim registration channel. According to the DOJ announcement, anyone who lost money on NexFundAI or related tokens can fill out a form to apply for compensation and legal protection.

The FBI launched a token, proactively disclosed information after the operation ended, and even opened a compensation channel for those who lost money; compared to the projects caught in this sting, the process was arguably much more legitimate.

The most absurd part is yet to come.

According to a report by blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs, within 24 hours of the DOJ announcement, someone cloned the FBI's NexFundAI smart contract and launched a copycat token. This person started with about $2,300, cashed out over 52 ETH within 24 hours, worth approximately $127,000 at the time.

The FBI used a fake token to prove market maker manipulation; the day the news broke, someone used the same tactic to launch a new meme and make another profit. Law enforcement took two years, but the market digested and absorbed the entire event in two hours, by launching yet another new shitcoin.

So next time you see a meme coin suddenly skyrocketing, you might want to think about whether it's a performance or real trading.

Of course, it could also be the FBI.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what was the primary tactic used by the 'market makers' exposed in the FBI sting operation?

AThey used automated bots or a network of wallets to place simultaneous buy and sell orders, creating fake trading volume to make a project appear more active and legitimate, thereby attracting real investors.

QWhat was the name of the fake project the FBI created, and what action did they take regarding its website after the operation concluded?

AThe fake project was called NexFundAI. After the operation, the FBI added a prominent banner to its website explaining it was a law enforcement investigation tool and provided links to official documents and a victim compensation form.

QWhich major project with a peak claimed valuation of $75 billion was implicated as a major client of the exposed market makers? What was the alleged method they used to inflate its value?

AThe project was Saitama. Its management allegedly coordinated through Telegram groups to place numerous small buy orders from multiple wallets, creating the illusion of widespread organic buying demand to pump the price before selling their own holdings.

QWhat ironic event occurred shortly after the Department of Justice announced the results of 'Operation Token Mirrors'?

AWithin 24 hours, someone cloned the NexFundAI smart contract and launched a copycat memecoin. Starting with about $2,300, the creator cashed out over 52 ETH (approx. $127,000 at the time), demonstrating the very market behavior the operation aimed to expose.

QWhat specific, self-incriminating quote from one of the market maker founders did the FBI record and highlight in the article?

AThe founder said, 'We have to make them lose money for us to make money,' where 'them' referred to retail investors.

Leituras Relacionadas

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight NewsHá 13m

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight NewsHá 13m

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbitHá 1h

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbitHá 1h

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

Veteran trader's case study: trading the market's "wrong expectations". This trade centered on a textbook "expectation error" after a weak CPI report. While the market initially priced in broad monetary easing (sending Nasdaq to 30,060), the crucial 30-year real yield hit a 20-year high. This signaled a fractured transmission mechanism: short-term rates eased, but long-term funding costs (vital for tech valuations) refused to fall. The trader executed five short positions on the Nasdaq (NQ) as it fell from 30,060 to 28,768. The core methodology: don't just trade the data, but analyze the market's implied causal chain and identify where it breaks. In this case, the chain was: Weak CPI → Policy Easing → Lower Long-Term Funding Costs → NQ Valuation Expansion. The break occurred between policy easing and long-term rates. The "veto variable" – long-term real yields – refused to confirm the bullish narrative. Trades were structured around "fast variables" (price) temporarily repairing while "slow variables" (funding conditions) remained broken. The article outlines a repeatable framework: 1) Map the market's implied causal chain. 2) Identify the veto variable. 3) Observe if it rejects the narrative. 4) Enter when price still follows the old script. 5) Choose the cleanest asset expression (e.g., short NQ, not broad S&P). 6) Define both invalidation and fulfillment exit conditions. The key insight: Alpha often comes not from an information edge, but from a "reaction function edge" – recognizing when the market is applying an outdated causal logic to new data. The critical question: What causal chain is the market's first reaction relying on, and is that chain still valid today?

marsbitHá 2h

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar F

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Synfutures (F) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Synfutures (F) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Synfutures (F)Depois de comprar o teu Synfutures (F), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Synfutures (F)Transaciona facilmente Synfutures (F) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

284 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar F

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de F (F) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片