The AI Stock Genius Who Made 60x Bets $7.7 Billion on Nvidia Topping Out

链捕手Publicado em 2026-05-20Última atualização em 2026-05-20

Resumo

An AI-focused hedge fund named Situational Awareness LP, known for its 60x returns, has taken a significant bearish stance on semiconductor stocks in Q1 2026. Its 13F filing reveals a massive 148% quarterly increase in nominal exposure to $13.677 billion, with over 60% of the new exposure directed towards put options on major chip players. Key bearish bets include $2.04 billion in puts on the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and $1.56 billion on NVIDIA, alongside positions against Broadcom, Oracle, AMD, and others. The fund simultaneously increased its long equity holdings in AI infrastructure and compute providers like CoreWeave and Bitcoin mining companies repurposing for compute. The core thesis behind this positioning is a shift in the primary constraint for AI expansion. The fund argues that while GPU supply was the critical bottleneck in previous years, the new limiting factors for large-scale AI cluster deployment are physical infrastructure: electrical grid access (with multi-year backlogs in the US), power availability, land, and data center construction timelines. The fund is not betting against AI's success but rather hedging against potential valuation corrections in semiconductor stocks whose prices may have run ahead, while directly investing in the downstream physical bottlenecks—power and data center capacity—it believes will capture value next. This move translates a previously theoretical narrative about infrastructure constraints into a concrete, high-convic...

Author: BiBi News

On May 18, 2026, Situational Awareness LP submitted its 13F filing for the first quarter of 2026.

The fund's nominal exposure to U.S. stocks and options expanded from $5.52 billion at the end of 2025 to $13.677 billion, a single-quarter growth of 148%.

However, what caught market attention was not the size, but the structure: over 60% of the new nominal exposure was entirely placed in put options on the semiconductor sector.

What Q1 Did

The put options cover nine targets: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH), NVIDIA, Broadcom, Oracle, AMD, Micron, TSMC, ASML, Intel.

Among them, SMH has the largest put nominal size at $2.04 billion, followed by NVIDIA at $1.56 billion. Micron and TSMC hold both call and put options, indicating a bet on volatility rather than a one-sided short.

It should be noted that the 13F filing only discloses the nominal value of options, making it impossible to directly determine the net short size. These put positions could be active shorting or could be hedging protection purchased while holding long positions.

The full intent cannot be reconstructed from the filing alone.

In the stock direction, the fund continued to bet on computing infrastructure.

CoreWeave holdings increased from 6.1 million shares to 7.18 million shares; IREN and Applied Digital were similarly increased;

The expansion was most pronounced in the miner direction: Bitfarms (now renamed Keel Infrastructure) increased from 6.9 million shares to 19.88 million shares, CleanSpark increased from 1.64 million shares to 12.28 million shares, Riot Platforms increased from 6.17 million shares to 11.5 million shares.

Bloom Energy reduced holdings by 3.59 million shares but still holds about $879 million in market value, while retaining 408.5 thousand call options. This is profit-taking, not a change in direction.

Exits were concentrated in the optical communication direction.

Lumentum and Coherent were completely liquidated; last quarter, Lumentum's position accounted for as much as 8.68%, this quarter it is zero.

Intel's operation deserves separate attention: last quarter held about 20 million call options, all liquidated this quarter, while establishing new put option positions.

Not a flat position, but a complete reversal in direction, from bullish to bearish.

Where the Bottleneck Is, the Money Is

The logic behind this 13F is a specific judgment on supply and demand: the constraints on AI expansion are shifting.

Over the past two years, the core constraint limiting AI scale was GPU shortage, so the market persistently traded NVIDIA, HBM memory, advanced manufacturing, and optical communication. During this phase, the semiconductor sector as a whole received a significant premium.

However, as computing clusters scale towards hundreds of thousands or even millions of GPUs, new constraints are emerging.

Grid connection applications in the US currently have a backlog exceeding 2TW, with an average wait time of over five years; transformer capacity is limited, and new data center construction cycles are measured in years; chips can continue to expand production, but the electricity, land, and construction capabilities needed to support their operation cannot keep pace.

Under this judgment, the logic of shorting the semiconductor sector is not the belief that AI will fail, but that valuations in the chip sector have already priced in expectations, and value is migrating to downstream physical infrastructure.

Buying puts on SMH and NVIDIA hedges against potential valuation corrections in the chip sector; continuing to hold CoreWeave, transformed miner companies, Bloom Energy, is betting on the real bottlenecks: electricity and data center capacity.

CoreWeave's operation also confirms this thinking: call options were slashed from 10.81 million to 1.81 million, while common shares increased from 6.1 million to 7.18 million shares.

The direction hasn't changed, only the high-leverage option positions were swapped for common stock to reduce portfolio volatility impact.

From $225 Million to $13.677 Billion

This fund was founded in September 2024; its first 13F disclosed U.S. stock exposure of about $225 million. By the end of 2025, this number had grown to $5.52 billion; as of March 31, 2026, the nominal exposure reached $13.677 billion.

In the first half of 2025, the fund achieved a return of about 47%, while the S&P 500 rose only about 6%; for the full year, it outperformed the S&P 500 by about 12.5 percentage points.

Before founding the fund, this 24-year-old German published a 165-page paper titled "Situational Awareness: The Decade Ahead," outlining judgments on the AGI timeline and that power and computing infrastructure would become the biggest bottlenecks. The fund's early capital came from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, and Stripe co-founders Patrick and John Collison.

The significance of this quarterly report is that it translates a judgment that was previously more narrative into concrete portfolio structure.

Chips are merely the entry point for expansion; what truly determines the speed of AI expansion is whether, in the real world, power can be connected, data centers can be built, and grid connection approvals can be obtained within five years.

If this judgment holds, the keywords for AI investment over the past two years were GPU and models; in the coming years, they may be electricity, land, and construction time.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the most significant action taken by Situational Awareness LP in Q1 2026, as revealed by its 13F filing?

AOver 60% of the fund's new nominal exposure was placed in put options on the semiconductor sector, signaling a major directional bet against or a hedge for the chip industry. This includes significant put positions on VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and NVIDIA.

QWhich physical infrastructure sectors did Situational Awareness LP increase its long positions in, and why?

AThe fund increased long positions in power and data center infrastructure companies like CoreWeave, IREN, Applied Digital, and bitcoin miners transitioning to data centers (e.g., Bitfarms, CleanSpark, Riot Platforms). This was based on the belief that constraints for AI expansion are shifting from GPU shortages to bottlenecks in electricity, land, and construction capacity.

QWhat was Situational Awareness LP's specific action regarding Intel in Q1 2026, and what does it indicate?

AThe fund completely closed its approximately 20 million call option positions on Intel from the previous quarter and simultaneously established new put option positions. This indicates a complete reversal in view, from bullish to bearish on the company.

QAccording to the article's analysis, what is the core logic behind the fund's seemingly contradictory moves of holding puts on chips while being long on infrastructure?

AThe core logic is that the valuation for chip companies has already priced in high expectations, while the real constraint for future AI growth is the availability of physical infrastructure like power grids and data centers. Therefore, the fund is hedging potential chip valuation pullbacks while betting on the rising value of the downstream infrastructure bottlenecks.

QHow has Situational Awareness LP's performance been since its inception, and who were its notable early backers?

ASince its founding in September 2024, the fund's nominal exposure grew from $225 million to $13.677 billion by Q1 2026. It significantly outperformed the S&P 500, delivering ~47% returns in H1 2025 versus the index's ~6%. Early backers included prominent figures like Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, and Stripe co-founders Patrick and John Collison.

Leituras Relacionadas

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHá 24m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHá 24m

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHá 54m

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHá 54m

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX LearnHá 56m

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX LearnHá 56m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar GENIUS

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Genius (GENIUS) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Genius (GENIUS) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Genius (GENIUS)Depois de comprar o teu Genius (GENIUS), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Genius (GENIUS)Transaciona facilmente Genius (GENIUS) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

224 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar GENIUS

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de GENIUS (GENIUS) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片