Thailand links crypto & carbon credits to derivatives market: Details

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-12Última atualização em 2026-02-12

Resumo

Thailand has officially integrated digital assets and carbon credits into its regulated derivatives market under the Derivatives Trading Act. This allows cryptocurrencies and carbon credits to serve as underlying assets for futures and options trading on the Thailand Futures Exchange, shifting their status from speculative instruments to regulated investment products. The move enables institutional investors to manage risk more effectively and supports market diversification. Stricter licensing and supervision rules are being implemented to ensure stability. This development is part of Thailand’s broader strategy to position itself as a digital economy leader in Southeast Asia, with plans to introduce Bitcoin ETFs by 2026. The policy follows years of regulatory evolution, including earlier exchange licensing, a ban on crypto payments, and recent tax incentives.

In a surprising turn of events, Thailand’s government has decided to officially include digital assets and carbon credits in its regulated derivatives market.

This means cryptocurrencies and carbon credits can now be used as reference products under the country’s Derivatives Trading Act.

With this decision, Thailand is moving away from treating crypto as just a speculative investment. Digital assets and carbon credits can now be used for futures and options trading on the Thailand Futures Exchange.

This allows large investors and institutions to trade them in a more serious and structured way, similar to gold or oil.

Execs weigh in...

Remarking on the same in the Bangkok Post, Nirun Fuwattananukul, chief executive of Binance TH, said,

“The move marks a watershed moment for the country’s capital markets. It sends a strong signal that Thailand is positioning itself as a forward-looking leader in Southeast Asia’s digital economy.”

By upgrading digital assets and carbon credits to official underlying assets, the government is giving the SEC more power to connect traditional finance with the digital economy.

Until now, most Thai investors could only trade crypto through spot trading, meaning they bought and held assets.

Under the new rules, the Thailand Futures Exchange can now offer products like Bitcoin [BTC] futures and options.

Benefits offered

This gives investors better tools to manage risk and protect themselves from sudden price drops. It also supports market growth, as crypto can now be part of diversified portfolios, with allocations of up to 5%.

At the same time, regulators are introducing strict safety rules. Crypto firms like Binance TH must meet higher licensing standards, and brokers will follow new supervision guidelines to prevent market instability.

According to Fuwattananukul, these changes turn crypto into a regulated asset class and prepare Thailand for future developments, including Bitcoin ETFs by 2026, bringing it closer to global financial hubs like New York and Hong Kong.

Thailand’s crypto journey from 2018 to 2026

Needless to say, Thailand’s current policy shift is the result of years of gradual change in how the country views digital assets. In 2018, the government introduced rules for crypto exchanges, creating the first licensing system.

By 2021, crypto trading had become extremely popular, with some people even using Bitcoin to buy luxury goods. To protect financial stability, the Bank of Thailand banned crypto payments in March 2022.

After this, Thailand adopted a balanced approach. It limited crypto as everyday money but encouraged it as an investment. The government introduced tax benefits, launched a regulatory sandbox in 2024, and allowed banks to enter the sector.

For example, Kasikorn Bank received a crypto custodian license and began offering digital services in 2025. Local projects like KUB, JFIN, and BAND also helped move the market beyond the crackdown period.

This push became a part of a wider plan to compete with global fintech hubs like Dubai and Singapore.

Additionally, a key incentive was also a capital gains tax exemption until 31st December 2029, for trades on approved platforms.

Thus, looking ahead, the launch of Bitcoin ETFs and carbon credit futures by 2026 could further strengthen Thailand’s role in the global digital economy.

Final Thoughts

Government support signals long-term commitment to digital finance, not short-term experimentation.
By allowing crypto futures and options, the country is shifting digital assets from speculation to serious, regulated investment tools.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two new asset classes that Thailand has officially included in its regulated derivatives market?

ADigital assets (cryptocurrencies) and carbon credits.

QAccording to Binance TH's CEO, what does this move signal about Thailand's position in the region?

AIt signals that Thailand is positioning itself as a forward-looking leader in Southeast Asia's digital economy.

QWhat new type of product can the Thailand Futures Exchange now offer under the new rules?

AThe Thailand Futures Exchange can now offer products like Bitcoin (BTC) futures and options.

QWhat was a key regulatory action the Bank of Thailand took in March 2022 regarding cryptocurrency?

AThe Bank of Thailand banned the use of cryptocurrencies for payments to protect financial stability.

QUntil what date is there a capital gains tax exemption for trades on approved crypto platforms in Thailand?

AThe capital gains tax exemption is in effect until 31st December 2029.

Leituras Relacionadas

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbitHá 1h

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbitHá 1h

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

A jurisdictional battle between the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the state of New Mexico over the regulation of prediction markets could set national rules for the industry. At issue is who polices platforms like Kalshi, with the CFTC asserting federal oversight and New Mexico arguing state gaming and consumer protection laws apply, especially for contracts resembling wagers on events like elections or sports. The outcome will determine if prediction markets can scale nationally under a clear federal framework or face a fragmented, state-by-state regulatory landscape. This dispute is significant for the crypto-adjacent trading community, which often engages with these speculative event markets. A clearer rulebook could boost mainstream adoption, liquidity, and integration with crypto infrastructure, while a state-led challenge could stifle growth. The case is particularly sensitive for sports-related contracts, where the line between financial markets and gambling blurs. Ultimately, this legal fight will shape whether prediction markets become a scalable national product or remain constrained by jurisdictional conflicts.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

bitcoinistHá 2h

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbitHá 8h

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手Há 8h

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbitHá 8h