Taurus links digital asset platforms to Swift’s blockchain ledger

cointelegraphPublicado em 2026-08-26Última atualização em 2026-08-26

Resumo

Digital asset infrastructure provider Taurus has integrated its tokenization and custody platforms with Swift's blockchain-based ledger. This allows Taurus clients to connect their existing infrastructure to use bank-issued tokenized deposits for payments. Initial client integrations are expected within days, with the first transactions via the platform anticipated in weeks. Swift's ledger, announced ready for initial use in July with 17 global banks piloting, serves as an orchestration layer for 24/7 cross-border payments using tokenized deposits. It coordinates transfers between institutions prior to final settlement. Notably, Standard Chartered and HSBC have already completed the ledger's first live cross-border transaction.

Digital asset infrastructure provider Taurus has integrated its tokenization and custody platforms with Swift’s blockchain-based ledger.

Taurus said Wednesday in an announcement shared with Cointelegraph that its clients can connect their existing digital asset infrastructure to the ledger for payments using bank-issued tokenized deposits.

The first client integrations are expected to go live within days, with the first distributed ledger technology transactions facilitated through its platforms expected within weeks.

Swift announced in July that the ledger was ready for initial use, with 17 banks across six continents preparing to pilot live transactions using tokenized deposits. Standard Chartered and HSBC have since completed the ledger’s first live cross-border transaction, connecting their separate tokenized deposit systems.

The international payments network’s ledger serves as an orchestration layer for round-the-clock cross-border payments using tokenized deposits on participating banks’ balance sheets. It coordinates transfers between institutions before final settlement through existing arrangements, including real-time gross settlement systems.

Related: StanChart, HSBC execute first live transaction on Swift blockchain ledger

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat has Taurus integrated with Swift's blockchain-based ledger?

ATaurus has integrated its tokenization and custody platforms with Swift's blockchain-based ledger.

QWhat can Taurus's clients connect to the Swift ledger for, using bank-issued tokenized deposits?

ATaurus's clients can connect their existing digital asset infrastructure to the Swift ledger for payments using bank-issued tokenized deposits.

QWhen were the first client integrations and the first DLT transactions expected to go live?

AThe first client integrations were expected to go live within days, and the first distributed ledger technology (DLT) transactions were expected within weeks.

QWhich banks completed the first live cross-border transaction on the Swift ledger?

AStandard Chartered and HSBC completed the Swift ledger's first live cross-border transaction.

QWhat is the primary function of Swift's ledger in the context of cross-border payments?

ASwift's ledger serves as an orchestration layer for round-the-clock cross-border payments using tokenized deposits on participating banks' balance sheets, coordinating transfers before final settlement through existing systems.

Leituras Relacionadas

One Vote Could Make SOL's Daily Burn Rate Soar 14 Times

Solana's first formal on-chain governance vote concluded on August 27th, coinciding with SOL hitting a yearly high. Three key proposals aimed at reshaping the network's tokenomics were decided. Solana's core challenge is a massive usage-to-value capture gap. Despite processing 120x more transactions than Ethereum and leading in DEX volume, its fee revenue is significantly lower due to its fee structure. Currently, most fees (priority fees) go to validators, with only a small base fee partially burned. This results in high net inflation (approx. 6k SOL issued vs. ~650 burned daily). The three proposals seek to address this: **SGP-0001** establishes the formal governance framework. **SGP-0002** (Double Deflation Acceleration) proposes doubling the annual reduction rate of new SOL issuance from 15% to 30%, aiming to reach the terminal inflation rate by 2029 instead of 2032, reducing issuance by an estimated 18.9 million SOL. **SGP-0003** (Resource & Entry Fee Restructuring) would split the base fee into a fixed "entry fee" for block producers and a variable, fully burned "resource fee." This could increase daily SOL burns by ~14x to 7,500-9,000. Major stakeholders like Helius, Jupiter, and Jito support the changes. However, opposition exists, notably from Solana Company (HSDT), whose revenue is 99.4% from staking. They argue rapid changes could disrupt institutional adoption. Critics also highlight a potential conflict where validators can vote against reduced staking yields using delegated SOL without explicit voter consent. The outcome of these votes provides a directional mandate. If passed, they represent a significant step towards aligning Solana's immense network activity with tangible economic value for SOL holders.

marsbitHá 10m

One Vote Could Make SOL's Daily Burn Rate Soar 14 Times

marsbitHá 10m

Chinese Venture Capital Is Shifting from 'Selecting People' to 'Selecting Cities'

Chinese Venture Capital: Shifting from "Picking Founders" to "Picking Cities" The article discusses a significant shift in China's venture capital (VC) landscape. Historically, VC investments heavily focused on the individual founder's vision, track record, and capability, as seen in early internet-era successes like Wang Xing (Meituan), Li Bin (Nio), and Li Xiang (Li Auto). The belief was that betting on exceptional people was the key to success. However, the rise of hard tech startups—in fields like semiconductors, robotics, AI, and biotech—has changed this calculus. These industries depend heavily on deep, localized ecosystems: specialized talent pools, established supply chains, manufacturing bases, and application scenarios. A city's industrial "resume" now significantly impacts a startup's chances. Examples include Shenzhen's dominance in robotics, Beijing's concentration of AI firms, Suzhou's biotech cluster, and Hefei's successful bet on semiconductor giant ChangXin. This shift is further driven by changes in funding sources. Government-guided funds and state-owned capital now dominate VC limited partners (LPs). These "patient capital" investors prioritize local economic development, job creation, and industrial chain growth alongside financial returns. Their early bets signal viability to other investors. Ultimately, the VC logic remains about managing risk and increasing the odds of success. In the hard tech era, a supportive city ecosystem provides crucial resources—talent, suppliers, R&D, and policy stability—that a single founder cannot easily assemble. The investment due diligence process has thus expanded from evaluating just the founder to also evaluating the founder's city. Consequently, capital is concentrating in a few regions with strong, focused industrial foundations, challenging other cities to build compelling, credible ecosystems to attract investment.

marsbitHá 1h

Chinese Venture Capital Is Shifting from 'Selecting People' to 'Selecting Cities'

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片