SpaceX Initiates Preparations for Largest IPO in History, Can Four Major Investment Banks Handle an $800 Billion Valuation?

比推Publicado em 2026-01-23Última atualização em 2026-01-23

Resumo

SpaceX is preparing for what could become the world's largest IPO, having selected Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley as lead underwriters. The company, valued at $800 billion in its latest internal share sale, may raise over $30 billion, surpassing Saudi Aramco's 2019 record. The IPO could take place as early as this year, though final decisions are still pending. SpaceX has established itself as a leading commercial rocket developer and operator of the Starlink satellite internet service. Its recent acquisition of wireless spectrum licenses further strengthens its market position. The potential listing is part of a broader wave of major tech IPOs, including companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks, and Canva. While market volatility remains a risk, the IPO market has recently regained momentum amid rising stock prices.

Author: Bao Yilong

Original Title: Is the World's Largest IPO Coming? SpaceX Selects Goldman Sachs and Three Other Major Investment Banks as Underwriters


Elon Musk's rocket manufacturer SpaceX is preparing for what could be a record-breaking global IPO, selecting four Wall Street investment banks as lead underwriters.

According to the Financial Times, citing informed sources, SpaceX executives recently held meetings with bankers from Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley, with the company planning to go public as early as this year.

The report cited sources indicating that other banks may also secure roles in the listing, but they cautiously noted that no final decision has been made yet.

Since its founding over two decades ago, SpaceX's valuation has continued to climb. The company has solidified its position as a leading developer of commercial rockets while also operating the Starlink satellite internet service.

As noted by Wall Street News, SpaceX set the price of its latest internal stock offering at $421 per share in December last year, valuing the company at an astonishing $800 billion. This could potentially set a record for the largest IPO in history.

Four Major Banks Lead Preparation Work

According to informed sources, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley have secured leading roles in SpaceX's IPO project. Sources added that other investment banks may also obtain positions in the project, but no final decision has been made yet. All four banks declined to comment, and SpaceX did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

As noted by Wall Street News, SpaceX's IPO is expected to raise over $30 billion, likely surpassing the $29 billion record set by Saudi Aramco's IPO in 2019, making it the largest IPO in history.

In September last year, SpaceX reached a $17 billion deal with the struggling operator EchoStar to acquire wireless spectrum licenses to enhance the Starlink network, enabling Musk to expand the service in the United States.

This deal further solidifies SpaceX's dominant position in the satellite internet field.

Tech Giants Flock to Go Public

SpaceX's listing preparations come as the U.S. market may welcome several large tech company IPOs.

AI companies OpenAI and Anthropic are also preparing for potential listing plans. Analysts say that just these three deals could raise more than the total amount of U.S. IPOs for the entire last year.

Other large private companies planning to go public this year include data analytics firm Databricks, valued at $134 billion, and design platform Canva, valued at $42 billion. The fitness tracking app Strava is also expected to launch its IPO in the coming months.

Despite the optimistic outlook, market volatility could still disrupt these listing plans.

Trump's tariff policies led to last year's IPO market falling short of expectations. Trump's tariff announcement in April dragged down the stock market, delaying several major tech company IPOs, disappointing investment bankers who had expected the listing market to recover strongly after three years of downturn.

However, as companies advance long-delayed listing plans and rising stock markets provide support, the IPO market has recently regained momentum.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7605563

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhich four major investment banks has SpaceX selected to lead its IPO preparation?

ASpaceX has selected Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley to lead its IPO preparation.

QWhat is the potential valuation of SpaceX for its upcoming IPO as mentioned in the article?

AThe potential valuation for SpaceX's upcoming IPO is an astounding $800 billion.

QWhat record could the SpaceX IPO break if it proceeds as planned?

AThe SpaceX IPO could break the record for the world's largest IPO, surpassing the $29 billion record set by Saudi Aramco in 2019.

QBesides its rocket manufacturing, what other major business contributes to SpaceX's high valuation?

ASpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service is a major business that contributes to its high valuation.

QAccording to the article, what are some other major tech companies that are also preparing for potential IPOs?

AOther major tech companies preparing for potential IPOs include OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks, Canva, and the fitness tracking app Strava.

Leituras Relacionadas

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbitHá 16m

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbitHá 16m

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbitHá 30m

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbitHá 30m

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

Vitalik Buterin recently proposed a conceptual shift for DeFi: replacing traditional Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs) and forced liquidations with an options-based mechanism. This aims to address key vulnerabilities in current DeFi lending. The traditional CDP model, foundational to protocols like MakerDAO and Aave, allows users to borrow against collateral but relies on real-time oracles and triggers sudden, mandatory liquidations during price volatility. This can cause cascading sell-offs, oracle manipulation risks, and significant MEV extraction, exacerbating market stress. Vitalik's alternative envisions splitting an asset like 1 ETH into two complementary components: one offering stable/index-like exposure and the other absorbing the opposite risk/reward. Instead of a hard liquidation threshold, a user's exposure to the target asset would gradually and smoothly deviate (following a near-quadratic curve) as the collateral price moves. The system would primarily depend on "slow oracles" for periodic settlement rather than instant price feeds. Key potential benefits include: the elimination of abrupt, forced liquidations; drastically reduced reliance on vulnerable real-time oracles; and inherent resistance to certain MEV exploits centered on liquidation auctions. The article posits that for Ethereum DeFi to maintain its relevance amid competition from faster, cheaper chains, it must compete on sophisticated financial engineering and robustness—not just transaction speed or yields. The core value proposition should shift towards offering users clearer, more manageable risk structures, greater autonomy, and resilience in extreme scenarios, moving DeFi from high-risk experimentation towards becoming reliable financial infrastructure.

marsbitHá 1h

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片