South Korea To Unveil Tokenized Securities Rules In July As Crypto Regulation Advances

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-05-16Última atualização em 2026-05-16

Resumo

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to release a detailed framework for tokenized securities in July. This initiative follows the passage of the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, which will take effect in February 2027. The regulations aim to allow qualified issuers to launch and trade tokenized securities using distributed ledger technology through licensed intermediaries. FSC Vice Chairman Kwon Dae-young emphasized balancing innovation with trust, market order, and investor protection. The framework will include rules for issuance, infrastructure, and distribution, and permit fractional investment securities. This move is part of South Korea's broader push to regulate digital assets. Concurrently, the country is preparing to implement a 20% income tax on crypto assets starting in 2027, despite some public and political opposition. Lawmakers are also urging the government to prioritize delayed stablecoin legislation.

South Korean authorities are set to release detailed rules for the issuance, infrastructure, and distribution of tokenized securities, as the country advances its efforts to implement crypto market regulations in 2027.

FSC Eyes July Tokenized Securities Framework

On Friday, South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) revealed it is preparing to publish its framework for tokenized securities in July during the second meeting of the public-private joint “Token Securities Council,” launched in March.

Earlier this year, the National Assembly passed the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, which will take effect on February 4, 2027, to amend the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act.

The changes are set to allow qualified issuers to launch tokenized securities using distributed ledger technology and enable the products to be traded as investment contract securities on brokerages and other licensed intermediaries.

FSC’s Vice Chairman Kwon Dae-young highlighted that the “upcoming token securities ecosystem must strike a balance between innovation and trust.” Therefore, the regulatory agency is reviewing measures to subordinate regulations and guidelines for the Tokenized Securities Act.

In addition, the regulator is expected to develop a phased roadmap for tokenizing existing standardized securities, such as stocks and bonds, as well as for on-chain settlements, drawing on international practices.

Discussing the best practices for eligibility and underlying assets, Kwon stated that the FSC will “We will uphold the fundamental principles of market order and investor protection, but we will not take a one-sided regulatory approach.” Notably, the regulator plans to allow the issuance of fractional investment securities by pooling underlying assets of the same type within a certain range.

He also explained that the government’s stance was to design a market structure that enhances trading efficiency, ensures fair competition, and protects users. The FSC’s Vice Chairman added that the regulator will add trading limits on OTC exchanges “in a way that allows the expansion of initial market liquidity while systematizing investor protection, so that the limits do not become a barrier stifling innovation.”

South Korea Prepares For Crypto Rules Implementation

The upcoming rules for tokenized securities come amid South Korea’s push to regulate digital assets and the local crypto market. Over the past few years, the country has worked to develop a framework to supervise the crypto industry and protect users.

Alongside the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, the government is expected to implement the Income Tax Act in 2027, with the tax authority fast-tracking the development of a tax base and tracking system to end years of delays.

As reported by Bitcoinist, South Korea’s National Tax Service (NTS) announced last month that it had begun “full-scale preparations” to implement the long-delayed crypto legislation in January of next year.

Under the Income Tax Act, crypto assets will be subject to a 20% income tax rate, up to 22% including local taxes, starting January 1, 2027. The financial authority plans to create a tax base by formally receiving pertinent data from crypto exchanges, establish a guidance framework for taxpayers subject to virtual asset income tax, and outline criteria for capital gains calculations.

Despite some efforts to abolish the crypto tax, including a People Power Party (PPP)-led bill and a petition with over 30,000 signatures, recent reports noted that the odds of abolishing or delaying it seem slim, as parliamentary petitions rarely lead to legislative action and authorities are committed to the 2027 rollout.

Meanwhile, South Korean lawmakers have repeatedly urged the government to prioritize stablecoin legislation, which has been delayed since late 2025 due to a disagreement between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the FSC.

The total crypto market capitalization is at $2.61 trillion in the one-week chart. Source: TOTAL on TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhen will South Korea release detailed rules for tokenized securities, and under which legislative act are these rules being developed?

ASouth Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to release its framework for tokenized securities in July 2026. These rules are being developed under the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, which was passed earlier in 2026 and amends the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act. This legislation is set to take effect on February 4, 2027.

QAccording to FSC Vice Chairman Kwon Dae-young, what key principles will guide the upcoming token securities ecosystem?

AFSC Vice Chairman Kwon Dae-young stated that the upcoming token securities ecosystem must strike a balance between innovation and trust. He emphasized that the regulator will uphold the fundamental principles of market order and investor protection while avoiding a one-sided regulatory approach. The goal is to design a market structure that enhances trading efficiency, ensures fair competition, and protects users.

QWhat are the two main components of South Korea's crypto regulations scheduled for implementation in 2027?

ASouth Korea's crypto regulations scheduled for full implementation in 2027 consist of two main components: the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, which governs the issuance and trading of tokenized securities, and the Income Tax Act, which imposes a tax on crypto asset income. The tax will be levied at a 20% income tax rate, potentially up to 22% including local taxes, starting January 1, 2027.

QWhat preparations is South Korea's National Tax Service (NTS) making for the 2027 crypto tax implementation, and what data will be used?

ASouth Korea's National Tax Service (NTS) has begun 'full-scale preparations' to implement the crypto income tax legislation in January 2027. To create the tax base, the authority plans to formally receive pertinent transaction and user data from crypto exchanges. This data will be used to establish a guidance framework for taxpayers and outline criteria for calculating capital gains on virtual asset transactions.

QWhat is the current status of stablecoin legislation in South Korea, and what has been the primary cause of its delay?

AStablecoin legislation in South Korea has been delayed and has not been prioritized by the government despite urging from lawmakers. The primary cause of the delay is a reported disagreement between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over regulatory responsibilities, which has stalled the process since late 2025.

Leituras Relacionadas

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHá 33m

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbitHá 33m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHá 40m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHá 40m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片