South Korea To Unveil Tokenized Securities Rules In July As Crypto Regulation Advances

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-05-16Última atualização em 2026-05-16

Resumo

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to release a detailed framework for tokenized securities in July. This initiative follows the passage of the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, which will take effect in February 2027. The regulations aim to allow qualified issuers to launch and trade tokenized securities using distributed ledger technology through licensed intermediaries. FSC Vice Chairman Kwon Dae-young emphasized balancing innovation with trust, market order, and investor protection. The framework will include rules for issuance, infrastructure, and distribution, and permit fractional investment securities. This move is part of South Korea's broader push to regulate digital assets. Concurrently, the country is preparing to implement a 20% income tax on crypto assets starting in 2027, despite some public and political opposition. Lawmakers are also urging the government to prioritize delayed stablecoin legislation.

South Korean authorities are set to release detailed rules for the issuance, infrastructure, and distribution of tokenized securities, as the country advances its efforts to implement crypto market regulations in 2027.

FSC Eyes July Tokenized Securities Framework

On Friday, South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) revealed it is preparing to publish its framework for tokenized securities in July during the second meeting of the public-private joint “Token Securities Council,” launched in March.

Earlier this year, the National Assembly passed the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, which will take effect on February 4, 2027, to amend the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act.

The changes are set to allow qualified issuers to launch tokenized securities using distributed ledger technology and enable the products to be traded as investment contract securities on brokerages and other licensed intermediaries.

FSC’s Vice Chairman Kwon Dae-young highlighted that the “upcoming token securities ecosystem must strike a balance between innovation and trust.” Therefore, the regulatory agency is reviewing measures to subordinate regulations and guidelines for the Tokenized Securities Act.

In addition, the regulator is expected to develop a phased roadmap for tokenizing existing standardized securities, such as stocks and bonds, as well as for on-chain settlements, drawing on international practices.

Discussing the best practices for eligibility and underlying assets, Kwon stated that the FSC will “We will uphold the fundamental principles of market order and investor protection, but we will not take a one-sided regulatory approach.” Notably, the regulator plans to allow the issuance of fractional investment securities by pooling underlying assets of the same type within a certain range.

He also explained that the government’s stance was to design a market structure that enhances trading efficiency, ensures fair competition, and protects users. The FSC’s Vice Chairman added that the regulator will add trading limits on OTC exchanges “in a way that allows the expansion of initial market liquidity while systematizing investor protection, so that the limits do not become a barrier stifling innovation.”

South Korea Prepares For Crypto Rules Implementation

The upcoming rules for tokenized securities come amid South Korea’s push to regulate digital assets and the local crypto market. Over the past few years, the country has worked to develop a framework to supervise the crypto industry and protect users.

Alongside the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, the government is expected to implement the Income Tax Act in 2027, with the tax authority fast-tracking the development of a tax base and tracking system to end years of delays.

As reported by Bitcoinist, South Korea’s National Tax Service (NTS) announced last month that it had begun “full-scale preparations” to implement the long-delayed crypto legislation in January of next year.

Under the Income Tax Act, crypto assets will be subject to a 20% income tax rate, up to 22% including local taxes, starting January 1, 2027. The financial authority plans to create a tax base by formally receiving pertinent data from crypto exchanges, establish a guidance framework for taxpayers subject to virtual asset income tax, and outline criteria for capital gains calculations.

Despite some efforts to abolish the crypto tax, including a People Power Party (PPP)-led bill and a petition with over 30,000 signatures, recent reports noted that the odds of abolishing or delaying it seem slim, as parliamentary petitions rarely lead to legislative action and authorities are committed to the 2027 rollout.

Meanwhile, South Korean lawmakers have repeatedly urged the government to prioritize stablecoin legislation, which has been delayed since late 2025 due to a disagreement between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the FSC.

The total crypto market capitalization is at $2.61 trillion in the one-week chart. Source: TOTAL on TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhen will South Korea release detailed rules for tokenized securities, and under which legislative act are these rules being developed?

ASouth Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to release its framework for tokenized securities in July 2026. These rules are being developed under the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, which was passed earlier in 2026 and amends the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act. This legislation is set to take effect on February 4, 2027.

QAccording to FSC Vice Chairman Kwon Dae-young, what key principles will guide the upcoming token securities ecosystem?

AFSC Vice Chairman Kwon Dae-young stated that the upcoming token securities ecosystem must strike a balance between innovation and trust. He emphasized that the regulator will uphold the fundamental principles of market order and investor protection while avoiding a one-sided regulatory approach. The goal is to design a market structure that enhances trading efficiency, ensures fair competition, and protects users.

QWhat are the two main components of South Korea's crypto regulations scheduled for implementation in 2027?

ASouth Korea's crypto regulations scheduled for full implementation in 2027 consist of two main components: the Token Securities Institutionalization Act, which governs the issuance and trading of tokenized securities, and the Income Tax Act, which imposes a tax on crypto asset income. The tax will be levied at a 20% income tax rate, potentially up to 22% including local taxes, starting January 1, 2027.

QWhat preparations is South Korea's National Tax Service (NTS) making for the 2027 crypto tax implementation, and what data will be used?

ASouth Korea's National Tax Service (NTS) has begun 'full-scale preparations' to implement the crypto income tax legislation in January 2027. To create the tax base, the authority plans to formally receive pertinent transaction and user data from crypto exchanges. This data will be used to establish a guidance framework for taxpayers and outline criteria for calculating capital gains on virtual asset transactions.

QWhat is the current status of stablecoin legislation in South Korea, and what has been the primary cause of its delay?

AStablecoin legislation in South Korea has been delayed and has not been prioritized by the government despite urging from lawmakers. The primary cause of the delay is a reported disagreement between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over regulatory responsibilities, which has stalled the process since late 2025.

Leituras Relacionadas

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbitHá 12m

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbitHá 12m

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbitHá 26m

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbitHá 26m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHá 56m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHá 56m

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHá 1h

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片