South Korea moves to block USDT and USDC from corporate trading – Details

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-08Última atualização em 2026-03-08

Resumo

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) is moving to exclude USD-based stablecoins like USDT and USDC from its upcoming corporate crypto trading guidelines. This decision aims to prevent indiscriminate investments in the early market stages and is partly due to the current legal framework not recognizing stablecoins as a valid external payment method. The proposed rules will allow eligible firms to invest up to 5% of their capital in crypto, but only in top assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, traded through regulated exchanges. This aligns with South Korea's broader push to promote the Korean Won-pegged stablecoins and reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar, a trend also emerging in other countries like China and Russia.

South Korea is mulling banning USD-based stablecoins, especially Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, from its upcoming corporate crypto rules.

According to a local publication, the country’s watchdog, the Financial Services Commission (FSC), will exclude dollar-denominated stablecoins from the ‘corporate virtual currency trading’ guidelines.

The report noted the move was designed to “prevent indiscriminate investments’ in the early stages of the market.

Additionally, the current legal framework, the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act, does not treat stablecoins as a means of external payment. A recent push for the amendment of the Act to include stablecoins has yet to be ratified.

Even so, local firms had requested that stablecoins be included to help them hedge against exchange rate risks and drive faster settlements.

South Korea proposed crypto rules

For over nine years, South Korea’s crypto scene has mostly been dominated by individual retail investors. However, there has been strong institutional crypto adoption across the U.S., the E.U., and parts of Asia.

As such, South Korea has opted to set clear rules for local corporations seeking to engage in the sector.

These rules will be rolled out in the upcoming FSC’s corporate crypto trading rules.

Per the proposal, eligible firms will invest up to 5% of their capital in crypto. However, the investment will be restricted only to the top crypto assets, including Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH].

Besides, transactions will be conducted strictly through regulated exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb.

That said, South Korea has been pushing for stablecoins denominated in Korean Won (KRW) since last year to reduce reliance on US dollar alternatives.

So, the need for monetary sovereignty could also be another key reason for excluding USDT and USDC. In fact, China and Russia have made similar moves, underscoring stablecoin adoption as a national security issue among key players.

Stablecoins, or digital currencies pegged to various traditional currencies, have grown to over $300 billion amid explosive global adoption. The crypto rails have made stablecoins a low-cost and fast way to send remittances and international payments.

Stablecoin activity in Asia

However, U.S dollar-based USDT and USDC control over 90% of the market share. But there’s a likely looming showdown as various jurisdictions position themselves to fight US dollar dominance.

Interestingly, Asia has emerged as a key stablecoin corridor, accounting for 60% ($245 billion) of total activity in 2025. Asia-originated activity is primarily driven by Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan. But most of these countries are pushing to secure their turf from U.S dollar stablecoins.

It remains to be seen how these proposed foreign stablecoins will compete with USDC and USDT in the near future.


Final Summary

  • South Korean regulators and lawmakers are considering excluding USDT and USDC from corporate crypto trading guidelines
  • Broader Asia dominated global stablecoin activity, driving $245B in 2025, but individual countries are pushing for stablecoins pegged to their local currencies.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy is South Korea considering banning USDT and USDC from corporate crypto trading?

ASouth Korea is considering this ban to prevent indiscriminate investments in the early stages of the market, and because the current Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not treat stablecoins as a means of external payment. Additionally, the country is pushing for monetary sovereignty by promoting stablecoins denominated in the Korean Won (KRW).

QWhat is the maximum percentage of capital that eligible South Korean firms can invest in crypto under the new proposal?

AEligible firms will be allowed to invest up to 5% of their capital in crypto, but this investment will be restricted to top crypto assets like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).

QWhich regulated exchanges will be used for corporate crypto transactions in South Korea?

ACorporate crypto transactions will be conducted strictly through regulated exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb.

QWhat percentage of global stablecoin activity did Asia account for in 2025, according to the article?

AAsia accounted for 60% of total global stablecoin activity in 2025, which amounted to $245 billion.

QWhat are the two main reasons cited for the push towards local currency stablecoins in various countries?

AThe two main reasons are to reduce reliance on U.S. dollar alternatives and to address stablecoin adoption as a matter of national security, as seen in the moves by countries like China and Russia.

Leituras Relacionadas

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手Há 7m

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手Há 7m

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbitHá 38m

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbitHá 38m

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbitHá 1h

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片