Snowflake's stock price surges 33%, AI infrastructure expands from chips to the data layer

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-29Última atualização em 2026-05-29

Resumo

Snowflake's stock surged over 33% after the company raised its full-year revenue forecast and announced a $6 billion, five-year partnership with AWS. This agreement, which secures AWS Graviton chip supply, underscores Snowflake's evolving role in the AI infrastructure landscape. The market's reaction reflects a reassessment of data platforms as critical enablers for enterprise AI adoption. As companies move beyond conceptual AI to building operational, data-integrated AI workflows, demand for robust data storage, processing, and analysis capabilities is increasing. The deal strengthens AWS's custom chip ecosystem while positioning Snowflake not just as a data warehouse, but as a key data layer for deploying and managing AI applications. Analysts have rapidly revised their valuations upwards, signaling a shift in sentiment where proven AI-driven revenue growth is now commanding premium multiples.

Editor's note: The narrative of AI investments is further expanding from chips and models to the data infrastructure layer.

After facing stock price pressure since the beginning of the year, Snowflake saw its stock surge over 33% in a single day after raising its full-year revenue forecast and securing a $6 billion five-year cooperation agreement with AWS. The core of this market reaction isn't just about better-than-expected earnings; it's that investors have started to reassess Snowflake's position in the enterprise AI implementation chain.

Over the past year, enterprise software companies have generally faced a question: Will AI become a growth engine, or will it undermine their existing business models? Snowflake's latest performance and the AWS partnership provide a relatively clear answer—when enterprises start deploying AI applications at scale, the capabilities for data storage, processing, analysis, and model deployment become even more critical.

In this partnership, the supply of AWS Graviton chips addresses the computing power constraint issue, while the deeper integration of the Snowflake platform with AWS AI workloads points to a more profound enterprise need: companies don't simply "use AI"; they need to connect their own data into AI workflows to build operational, manageable, and scalable application systems.

This is also why Snowflake is being re-integrated into the "AI winner" narrative. AI software stocks previously experienced a sell-off, with the market being skeptical about whether "AI can truly contribute to revenue." However, Snowflake's case shows that once AI translates from conceptual demonstrations into real revenue growth, market sentiment can reverse rapidly. The fact that at least 30 analysts raised their price targets illustrates that the capital markets are re-pricing the value of data platforms within the AI infrastructure cycle.

What's even more noteworthy is that this deal also reinforces the presence of AWS's in-house chip ecosystem. From Anthropic, OpenAI, and Meta to Uber, and now Snowflake, Amazon is embedding itself deeper into the AI infrastructure through cloud, chip, and enterprise software partnerships. For Snowflake, this means it is not just an enterprise data warehouse company but is becoming a critical data layer in the process of enterprise AI application implementation.

The original text follows:

May 28—Snowflake's stock surged more than 33% on Thursday. The company previously raised its full-year revenue forecast and announced a $6 billion cooperation agreement with Amazon, bolstering investor confidence in its position as a key beneficiary of the AI boom.

This five-year agreement with Amazon Web Services (AWS) will secure a crucial supply of AWS Graviton chips for Snowflake. Currently, computing resources are becoming increasingly scarce as AI usage grows substantially.

The agreement will also further deepen the integration between Snowflake's data storage, processing, and analytics products and AI workloads on the AWS cloud. As enterprises rapidly scale their AI applications, Snowflake is poised to capture more demand. Currently, most of Snowflake's customers run on AWS.

Following the announcement, at least 30 analysts raised their price targets for Snowflake, pushing the median target price from $230 before Wednesday's earnings report to $280. The stock was last trading at $233.50 in early trading.

If the current gains hold, Snowflake's market value would increase by approximately $20 billion from its previous $607.5 billion.

Matt Britzman, a senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, stated that Snowflake's sharp stock rise—the stock was down 20% year-to-date before the previous trading day's close—"shows how much skepticism had built up during the wider AI software sell-off that hit data names."

"But it also shows how quickly sentiment can turn once a company proves AI is already driving revenue rather than just being PowerPoint filler."

Currently, Snowflake's forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio is 85.21 times, compared to 85.19 times for Datadog and 47.17 times for MongoDB. A higher P/E ratio typically indicates investors are betting on stronger future growth.

Previously, market concerns that AI would disrupt enterprise software put pressure on Snowflake. Now, the company is embedding AI into its platform, helping businesses integrate data from multiple sources, perform analysis, and build AI tools.

"We believe this set of results puts Snowflake squarely in the 'AI winner' camp and deserves a higher valuation multiple," said Patrick Colville, an equity research analyst at Scotiabank. He added that this clearly indicates Snowflake is benefiting from the growth in enterprise AI adoption.

Snowflake helps businesses store, manage, and analyze all their data on one platform. Its AI tools like Cortex Code and Snowpark are seeing strong adoption. These tools enable enterprises to build generative AI applications based on their own data and deploy machine learning models.

This agreement also serves as another vote of confidence in Amazon's in-house chip business. In recent months, Amazon has secured several significant customers, including Anthropic, OpenAI, Facebook parent Meta, and Uber.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat were the two main factors that led to Snowflake's stock price surging over 33%?

ASnowflake's stock price surged over 33% primarily due to two factors: 1) The company raised its full-year revenue guidance. 2) It announced a five-year, $6 billion partnership agreement with Amazon Web Services (AWS).

QWhat does the $6 billion AWS deal specifically provide to Snowflake, and why is it important?

AThe $6 billion deal provides Snowflake with a critical supply of AWS Graviton chips. This is important because as AI usage grows, computing power resources are becoming increasingly scarce and constrained.

QHow does the article describe the shift in the AI investment narrative, and what role does Snowflake now play in it?

AThe article states that the AI investment narrative is shifting from chips and models to the data infrastructure layer. Snowflake is now being re-evaluated as a key data layer, essential for enterprises to integrate their own data into AI workflows and build manageable, scalable AI application systems.

QAccording to the analyst from Hargreaves Lansdown, what does Snowflake's stock surge indicate about market sentiment?

AMatt Britzman from Hargreaves Lansdown stated that the surge indicates how much skepticism had built up during the broader AI software sell-off that dragged down data-related companies. It also shows how quickly market sentiment can reverse once a company proves that AI is driving actual revenue growth, not just being a presentation talking point.

QWhat are some of the specific AI tools offered by Snowflake mentioned in the article, and what is their purpose?

AThe article mentions Snowflake's Cortex Code and Snowpark AI tools. Their purpose is to enable enterprises to build generative AI applications and deploy machine learning models based on their own data.

Leituras Relacionadas

Circle Blacklists Zama Protocol Address, Freezing $12.6M In User Funds – Details

Circle has blacklisted a smart contract address for the Zama protocol's Confidential USDC (cUSDC), freezing approximately $12.6 million in user funds. The action, identified by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, targeted a publicly documented contract on Ethereum. Investigations suggest the frozen funds may be indirectly connected to ongoing controversy and legal issues surrounding Overnight Finance, an asset-management protocol. A wallet linked to Overnight Finance had deposited a large sum into the Zama contract amidst governance disputes and allegations of a possible rug pull. This move by Circle, reportedly made without prior warning to Zama, has reignited criticism over transparency and unilateral enforcement by centralized stablecoin issuers. It highlights concerns about how external legal and governance risks can impact unrelated users in interconnected DeFi systems. Circle has not provided an official explanation for the freeze.

bitcoinistHá 24m

Circle Blacklists Zama Protocol Address, Freezing $12.6M In User Funds – Details

bitcoinistHá 24m

Why More AI Agents Does Not Equal Higher Productivity?

Editor's Note: As AI Agents become cheaper and easier to use, a new constraint emerges: the cost isn't in launching more Agents, but in the human attention required to manage, judge, and integrate their outputs. This hidden cost is called the "orchestration tax." The article argues that a developer's cognitive bandwidth is the key bottleneck—a serial, non-parallelizable resource akin to a Global Interpreter Lock (GIL). While many Agents can run concurrently, their results ultimately require human judgment for review, conflict resolution, and final integration. Therefore, more Agents don't automatically mean higher productivity; they can simply create longer queues, lead to cognitive fatigue, and create the illusion of busyness without real output. The core solution is to design workflows around this scarce human attention. Key strategies include: scaling the number of Agents to match review capacity (not UI capacity), categorizing tasks (delegating independent ones, keeping complex judgment-heavy ones serial), batch reviewing results to minimize context-switching costs, automating verifiable checks to reserve human judgment for critical decisions, and protecting focused, uninterrupted thinking time. Ultimately, the critical skill is not launching many Agents, but architecting systems that respect the fundamental limit of human attention. Unpaid "orchestration tax" accumulates as both technical and cognitive debt, undermining system understanding and quality. True productivity comes from thoughtfully managing the single-threaded resource—your focus.

marsbitHá 1h

Why More AI Agents Does Not Equal Higher Productivity?

marsbitHá 1h

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbitHá 7h

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbitHá 7h

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手Há 10h

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手Há 10h

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbitHá 11h

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbitHá 11h

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar LAYER

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Solayer (LAYER) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Solayer (LAYER) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Solayer (LAYER)Depois de comprar o teu Solayer (LAYER), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Solayer (LAYER)Transaciona facilmente Solayer (LAYER) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

306 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de LAYER (LAYER) são apresentadas abaixo.