Small-Cap Tokens Hit Four-Year Lows: Is the 'Altcoin Season' Completely Lost?

深潮Publicado em 2025-12-15Última atualização em 2025-12-15

Resumo

Small-cap cryptocurrency tokens have plummeted to multi-year lows, with indices tracking altcoins outside the top assets by market cap showing severe underperformance in 2024–2025. While the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 delivered strong double-digit returns with limited drawdowns, the CoinDesk 80 Index (excluding the top 20 cryptocurrencies) fell nearly 40% by mid-2025, and the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index hit its lowest level since November 2020. Despite high correlation (0.9) with major crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, small-cap tokens offered no diversification benefits and instead came with deeply negative risk-adjusted returns, high volatility, and severe drawdowns—often exceeding 30–46% in a single quarter. Liquidity has increasingly concentrated in high-value, institutionally accepted assets such as BTC, ETH, and a few altcoins like SOL and XRP, reflecting a flight to quality and regulatory clarity. The data suggests that, in the current cycle, broad altcoin exposure has failed to justify its risk, performing worse than both U.S. equities and core crypto assets.

Written by: Gino Matos

Compiled by: Luffy, Foresight News

Since January 2024, the performance comparison between cryptocurrencies and stocks indicates that the so-called new "altcoin trading" is essentially just a substitute for stock trading.

In 2024, the S&P 500 index had a return of approximately 25%, reaching about 17.5% in 2025, with a cumulative two-year increase of nearly 47%. During the same period, the Nasdaq 100 index rose by 25.9% and 18.1% respectively, with a cumulative increase close to 49%.

The CoinDesk 80 Index, which tracks 80 assets outside the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market cap, plummeted 46.4% in the first quarter of 2025 alone, and by mid-July, it was down about 38% year-to-date.

By the end of 2025, the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index fell to its lowest level since November 2020, wiping out over $1 trillion from the total cryptocurrency market capitalization.

This divergence in performance is by no means a statistical error. Not only did a portfolio of overall altcoins have a negative return, but its volatility was also comparable to or even higher than that of stocks; in contrast, major U.S. stock indices achieved double-digit growth with manageable drawdowns.

For Bitcoin investors, the core question is: Can allocating to small-cap tokens provide risk-adjusted returns? Or is such an allocation merely taking on additional exposure to negative Sharpe ratio risk while maintaining similar correlation to stocks? (Note: The Sharpe ratio is a core metric for measuring the risk-adjusted return of an investment portfolio, calculated as: Annualized portfolio return - Annualized risk-free rate / Annualized portfolio standard deviation.)

Choosing a Reliable Altcoin Index

For analysis, CryptoSlate tracked three altcoin indices.

The first is the CoinDesk 80 Index, launched in January 2025. This index covers 80 assets outside the CoinDesk 20 Index, providing a diversified portfolio of标的 beyond Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other top tokens.

The second is the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index. This index selects the 50 smallest tokens by market cap from a basket of 100 assets, serving as a barometer for the market's "junk assets."

The third is the small-cap index launched by Kaiko. This is a research product, not a tradable benchmark, offering a clear sell-side quantitative perspective for analyzing the small-cap asset group.

These three depict the market landscape from different dimensions: the overall altcoin portfolio, high-beta small-cap tokens, and a quantitative research perspective. Yet, the conclusions they point to are highly consistent.

In contrast, the benchmark performance of the stock market shows a completely opposite trend.

In 2024, major U.S. indices achieved gains of around 25%, with double-digit growth also in 2025, accompanied by relatively limited drawdowns. During this period, the maximum intra-year drawdown for the S&P 500 index was only in the mid-to-high single digits, while the Nasdaq 100 index maintained a strong upward trend throughout.

Both major stock indices achieved compounded annual growth without significant givebacks of gains.

The trend of the overall altcoin indices, however, was vastly different. Reports from CoinDesk Indices show that the CoinDesk 80 Index plummeted 46.4% in the first quarter alone, while the large-cap tracking CoinDesk 20 Index fell 23.2%.

By mid-July 2025, the CoinDesk 80 Index was down 38% year-to-date, whereas the CoinDesk 5 Index, which tracks Bitcoin, Ethereum, and three other major tokens, gained between 12% and 13% over the same period.

Andrew Baehr of CoinDesk Indices, in an interview with ETF.com, described this phenomenon as "identical correlation, vastly different profit and loss performance."

The correlation between the CoinDesk 5 Index and the CoinDesk 80 Index was as high as 0.9, meaning their price movements were completely aligned in direction, but the former achieved modest double-digit growth while the latter crashed nearly 40%.

It turns out that the diversification benefits from holding small-cap altcoins were minimal, while the performance cost was severe.

The performance of the small-cap asset sector was even worse. According to Bloomberg, by November 2025, the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index had fallen to its lowest level since November 2020.

Over the past five years, this small-cap index had a return of approximately -8%, while the corresponding large-cap index surged about 380%. Institutional capital clearly favored large-cap assets, avoiding tail risks.

Looking at the performance of altcoins in 2024, the Kaiko small-cap index fell over 30% for the year, and mid-cap tokens also struggled to keep up with Bitcoin's gains.

Market winners were highly concentrated in a few top tokens, such as SOL and Ripple (XRP). Although the share of altcoin trading volume once rebounded to 2021 highs in 2024, 64% of the trading volume was concentrated in the top ten altcoins.

Liquidity in the cryptocurrency market did not disappear; it migrated towards higher-value assets.

Sharpe Ratio and Drawdown Magnitude

If compared from a risk-adjusted return perspective, the gap widens further. The CoinDesk 80 Index and various small-cap altcoin indices not only had deeply negative returns but also exhibited volatility comparable to or higher than stocks.

The CoinDesk 80 Index crashed 46.4% in a single quarter; the MarketVector small-cap index, after another round of declines, fell to pandemic-era lows in November.

The overall altcoin indices experienced multiple index-level halving drawdowns: the Kaiko small-cap index fell over 30% in 2024, the CoinDesk 80 Index plummeted 46% in Q1 2025, and the small-cap index fell again to 2020 lows by the end of 2025.

In contrast, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices achieved cumulative returns of 25% and 17% over the two years, with maximum drawdowns only in the mid-to-high single digits. The U.S. stock market had fluctuations, but they were overall manageable; the volatility of cryptocurrency indices, however, was highly destructive.

Even considering the high volatility of altcoins as a structural feature, their unit risk return from 2024 to 2025 was still far lower than that of holding major U.S. stock indices.

From 2024 to 2025, the overall altcoin index had a negative Sharpe ratio; the S&P and Nasdaq indices, even without volatility adjustment, showed strong Sharpe ratios. After volatility adjustment, the gap between them further widened.

Bitcoin Investors and Cryptocurrency Liquidity

The first insight from this data is the trend of liquidity concentration and migration towards high-value assets. Reports from Bloomberg and Whalebook on the MarketVector Small-Cap Index both pointed out that since early 2024, small-cap altcoins have consistently underperformed, while institutional funds flowed into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.

Combined with Kaiko's observations, although the share of altcoin trading volume rebounded to 2021 levels, funds were concentrated in the top ten altcoins. The market trend is clear: liquidity did not completely leave the cryptocurrency market; it migrated towards high-value assets.

The previous altcoin bull market was essentially just a basis trade strategy, not a structural outperformance of assets. In December 2024, the CryptoRank Altcoin Season Index once soared to 88 points, only to crash to 16 points in April 2025, completely erasing all gains.

The 2024 altcoin bull market ultimately turned into a typical bubble burst; by mid-2025, the overall altcoin portfolio had given back almost all its gains, while the S&P and Nasdaq indices continued to compound growth.

For wealth advisors and asset allocators considering diversification beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum, the data from CoinDesk provides a clear case reference.

As of mid-July 2025, the large-cap tracking CoinDesk 5 Index achieved modest double-digit growth year-to-date, while the diversified altcoin index CoinDesk 80 plummeted nearly 40%, yet their correlation was as high as 0.9.

Investors allocating to small-cap altcoins did not gain substantial diversification benefits; instead, they suffered far higher return losses and drawdown risks compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and U.S. stocks, while still being exposed to the same macro drivers.

Current capital views most altcoins as tactical trading instruments, not strategic allocation assets. From 2024 to 2025, Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs had significantly better risk-adjusted returns, and U.S. stocks also performed brilliantly.

Liquidity in the altcoin market is increasingly concentrating towards a few "institutional-grade coins," such as SOL, Ripple (XRP), and other tokens with independent positive catalysts or clear regulatory prospects. Asset diversity at the index level is being squeezed by the market.

In 2025, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices rose about 17%, while the CoinDesk 80 cryptocurrency index fell 40%, and small-cap cryptocurrencies fell 30%

What Does This Mean for Liquidity in the Next Market Cycle?

The market performance from 2024 to 2025 tested whether altcoins could achieve diversification value or outperform in an environment of rising macro risk appetite. During this period, U.S. stocks achieved double-digit growth for two consecutive years with manageable drawdowns.

Bitcoin and Ethereum gained institutional recognition through spot ETFs and benefited from a moderating regulatory environment.

In contrast, the overall altcoin indices not only had negative returns and larger drawdowns but also maintained high correlation with major crypto tokens and stocks, yet failed to provide adequate compensation for the additional risk investors undertook.

Institutional capital always chases performance. The five-year return of the MarketVector Small-Cap Index was -8%, while the corresponding large-cap index surged 380%. This gap reflects capital's continuous shift towards assets with clear regulation, sufficient derivatives market liquidity, and well-developed custody infrastructure.

The CoinDesk 80 Index's 46% crash in the first quarter and its 38% year-to-date decline by mid-July indicate that the trend of capital migration towards high-value assets is not reversing but accelerating.

For Bitcoin and Ethereum investors evaluating whether to allocate to small-cap crypto tokens, the data from 2024 to 2025 provides a clear answer: the absolute returns of overall altcoin portfolios underperformed U.S. stocks, their risk-adjusted returns were inferior to Bitcoin and Ethereum; despite a high correlation of 0.9 with major crypto tokens, they provided no diversification value.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the performance difference between the S&P 500 and the CoinDesk 80 index in 2025 according to the article?

AThe S&P 500 had a return of about 17.5% in 2025, while the CoinDesk 80 index plummeted by approximately 40%.

QWhich index is described as a barometer for the 'junk assets' in the crypto market?

AThe MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index is described as a barometer for the market's 'junk assets'.

QWhat key metric is used to argue that small-cap altcoins provided a negative risk-adjusted return compared to major stock indices?

AThe Sharpe Ratio is the key metric used, with the article stating the overall altcoin indices had a negative Sharpe Ratio, indicating poor risk-adjusted returns.

QWhat trend does the article identify regarding liquidity in the cryptocurrency market?

AThe article identifies a trend of liquidity concentration and migration towards higher-value assets, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, rather than a complete withdrawal from the crypto market.

QWhat was the correlation between the CoinDesk 5 Index (large-cap crypto) and the CoinDesk 80 Index (altcoins), and what does this imply for diversification?

AThe correlation was 0.9, which implies that holding small-cap altcoins provided minimal diversification benefits while resulting in significantly worse performance.

Leituras Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 39m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 39m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 56m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 56m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHá 1h

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片