ShapeShift founder denies $260mln whale accumulation – Here’s what we know!

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-23Última atualização em 2026-03-23

Recent on-chain data suggests that large investors are quietly building strong positions in Ethereum.

Over the past two weeks, a major whale, reportedly linked to Erik Voorhees, Founder of ShapeShift, has deployed nearly $260 million in USDT to accumulate more than 120,000 ETH.

This buying pattern points to a steady accumulation strategy rather than a one-time trade. For instance, in the latest transaction, the whale spent $4.29 million to purchase ETH at $2,134.

Source: Lookonchain/X

Overall, the average buying price stands at around $2,162, which now acts as a key support level for the market.

Such moves signal strong confidence that Ethereum may be nearing its bottom, with expectations of potential upside in the coming months.

Notably, this accumulation is happening even as ETH trades at $2,071.67, down over 3% in the last 24 hours. This paints a clear divergence between short-term price action and long-term investor sentiment.

Retail vs whale behavior

To understand this better, let’s analyse the Spot Retail Activity by CryptoQuant.

Historically, smaller investors tend to buy when prices are already high, driven by FOMO. This happened in past cycles like 2018, 2021, and even 2024.

Source: CryptoQuant

Right now, retail activity is relatively low, which is actually a good sign. It means the market is in a quieter phase where large investors are accumulating, while the public is still on the sidelines.

Interestingly, while this whale has been aggressively buying Ethereum [ETH], ETFs have been seeing money flow out, which may seem negative at first.

Source: Farside Investors

However, a closer look reveals that large whales are steadily increasing their holdings, while mid-sized investors seem to be selling or redistributing.

Meanwhile, retail investors remain inconsistent, often buying at higher levels and selling during dips.

Source: Santiment

Overall, this indicates that Ethereum is gradually moving from weaker hands to stronger, long-term holders, which is typically a bullish sign for the market.

Voorhees’ past whale move and a crazy plot twist

For those unaware, this whale activity began on the 16th of March and intensified on the 20th of March, when the Voorhees-linked whale made another major move.

Source: Lookonchain/X

However, the narrative took a sharp turn when Voorhees publicly denied any involvement and said,

I did not buy any eth and those tracking sites are a scam.

Now, this throws darts at two opposite possibilities. In the first case, it could be a different investor with similar wallet activity, or simply a misidentification by tracking platforms.

However, another possibility is stealth accumulation, where large investors buy quietly to avoid moving the market.

Whatever the possibilities may be, such whale movements do impact how investors perceive and feel about the token’s future.


Final Summary

  • Price weakness is being used as an opportunity by large players, not a warning sign.
  • ETF outflows may look bearish, but on-chain data shows whales are steadily increasing holdings.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat recent on-chain activity is linked to a major whale, and how much ETH was accumulated?

ARecent on-chain data suggests a major whale, reportedly linked to Erik Voorhees, deployed nearly $260 million in USDT to accumulate more than 120,000 ETH over the past two weeks.

QWhat is the average buying price for the whale's ETH accumulation, and why is it significant?

AThe average buying price for the whale's accumulation stands at around $2,162, which now acts as a key support level for the market.

QHow does the current retail activity for Ethereum compare to the behavior of large whales, according to the article?

ARetail activity is currently low, which is a sign the market is in a quieter phase where large investors are accumulating, while retail investors tend to buy at higher prices and sell during dips.

QWhat was Erik Voorhees's public response to the reports linking him to the whale activity?

AErik Voorhees publicly denied any involvement, stating, 'I did not buy any eth and those tracking sites are a scam.'

QWhat is one possible explanation given in the article for the whale's activity if it is not Voorhees?

AOne possibility is that it could be a different investor with similar wallet activity, or simply a misidentification by tracking platforms. Another possibility is stealth accumulation, where large investors buy quietly to avoid moving the market.

Leituras Relacionadas

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbitHá 55m

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbitHá 55m

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbitHá 1h

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbitHá 1h

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbitHá 2h

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片