Self-Directed Insider Trading: How He Manipulated Prediction Markets to Pay for His Bugatti?

比推Publicado em 2026-03-11Última atualização em 2026-03-11

Resumo

A prominent X user, @Euanker, has accused former kickboxing champion Andrew Tate of orchestrating an elaborate insider trading scheme on the prediction market platform Polymarket. The allegations claim that Tate controlled at least seven accounts to profit from markets predicting his own weekly tweet activity, earning a total of $52,286. On-chain evidence reveals a consistent funding path: deposits from exchanges like Duelbits and Bybit were bridged via a specific address, then used to place bets on Polymarket. Profits were ultimately funneled to a Gnosis Safe wallet controlled by Tate, which holds over $1.3 million in assets. The betting patterns closely aligned with Tate’s actual tweet activity, indicating manipulation. Andrew Tate, a controversial influencer known for his luxury lifestyle and previous involvement in meme coin promotions, is alleged to have used this scheme to fund expenses like his rented Bugatti. The incident highlights significant regulatory gaps in prediction markets, where outcomes controlled by a single individual create inherent insider risks. Polymarket, which approves all markets on its platform, faces scrutiny over its lack of safeguards against such manipulation.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

Original Title: Funding a Bugatti with Polymarket? Someone is Playing 'Self-Directed' Insider Trading

On March 10, X user @Euanker posted an exposé alleging that renowned combat sports champion Andrew Tate was involved in insider trading on Polymarket, profiting by manipulating markets related to the quantity of his personal tweets. Euanker pointed out that Tate created and controlled at least 7 Polymarket accounts, accumulating profits of $52,286 across six 'Weekly Tweet Count Prediction' markets. These markets essentially depend on Tate's own actions, with the exposé bluntly stating his aim was to 'raise funds for a rented Bugatti sports car.'

Interestingly, this exposé included detailed on-chain evidence and profit charts, allowing us a glimpse into the specifics of this insider trading.

Detailed Explanation of On-Chain Address Records: Identical Deposit Paths

The evidence provided by Euanker shows that the 7 Polymarket accounts (@Tornados, @eterboh5, @Mellisacars, @AntonFuar, @wondernot, @Lindayko, @Counteryeg) were highly consistent in their deposit exchanges, fund paths, and betting habits. The first 5 accounts have been fully linked through on-chain transactions, with the subsequent 2 also showing the same pattern.

The core tracking starts with the @Counteryeg account.

Its fund flow points to the bridging address 0xdae2844d5b3070aafb3638b80fa17e562d840dde. This address frequently conducted cross-chain transfers of USDC and USDC.e in the past week, primarily involving the Polygon and Ethereum networks. These funds were then transferred to the intermediary address 0x9D950Fb9D5F37a128bA0d4B82844DE96697fD83d.

Data from Arkham Intelligence for this address shows that in the past week, it received large USDC deposits from exchanges like Duelbits (a gambling platform), Changelly, and Bybit, accounting for 20%, 42%, and 26% respectively. Typical transactions include a 4000 USDC deposit from Duelbits, a 5700 USDC bridge withdrawal, and multiple transfers of 2500~6000 USDC to the upstream bridging address. The cumulative transaction volume of the address shows that the stablecoin flow rhythm highly coincides with Polymarket betting windows, presenting a unified pattern of 'large deposit first, precise betting second, profit aggregation after'.

The final fund chain points to a Gnosis Safe multi-signature address (confirmed by the exposé and transaction graph as belonging to Tate). Arkham records show this Safe holds over $1.3 million in assets, with recent large USDT/USDC withdrawal operations.

The entire chain forms a closed loop: exchange deposit → bridging address transfer → Polymarket betting → profit aggregation to Tate's controlled Gnosis Safe.

The fund flow chart attached by Euanker clearly marks the Polymarket icon and the Gnosis Safe endpoint. A profit chart of the 7 accounts further corroborates, showing a rapid climb from an initial loss of $5,203 on February 22 to a cumulative peak of $52,286 on March 10, with multiple instances synchronized with Tate's public tweet timings. This level of consistency far exceeds coincidence. The identical combination of exchanges, same USDC bridging scale, and operational patterns precisely matching market settlement times constitute the core on-chain basis for the exposé's insider trading allegations.

From Luxury Cars and Mansions to Meme Coins, Fans Become Tools for Monetizing Influence

Andrew Tate (full name Emory Andrew Tate III), born in 1986, is a public figure, businessman, and former professional fighter with dual US and UK citizenship. Tate began his professional kickboxing career in 2005, winning multiple championships in the late 2000s to early 2010s, including the ISKA British Full-Contact Cruiserweight Championship (2009) and the ISKA World Championship (2011), claiming to be a four-time world champion. He is about 1.91 meters tall, with the nicknames 'Cobra Tate' or 'Top G'.

Andrew Tate has long presented a luxurious lifestyle; his名下 (owned) or rented multiple Bugatti sports cars and numerous mansions have long been the core of his personal brand. The term 'rented Bugatti' in the exposé恰好吻合 (perfectly matches) Tate's publicly flaunted pattern of luxury consumption.

He has repeatedly showcased high-end assets on social platforms, using this to reinforce his 'alpha male' persona and attract young male fans globally. After retiring, he shifted to online business and content creation, launching paid course platforms (like Hustler's University and War Room), teaching topics like wealth building, entrepreneurship, and mindset training, primarily attracting young male audiences.

Starting in 2022, he and his brother Tristan were arrested in Romania, facing charges of human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal organization (related to recruiting women using the 'loverboy' method to produce adult content); the case is still ongoing. After the Romanian travel ban was lifted in late 2025, the two returned to the US. Currently, he also faces a UK civil lawsuit (four women alleging sexual violence and coercion), which has been moved up to Summer 2026. He denies all criminal and civil charges, calling them a political witch hunt against him.

Upon entering the crypto space, Tate further monetized his influence. He has issued multiple meme coins, the most representative being the DADDY series directly tied to his personal IP, achieving rapid monetization through fan-driven hype. Bubblemaps exposed that he had promoted over 10 shitcoins within 24 hours; after Bubblemaps revealed the insider information about DADDY token supply, Andrew subsequently blocked Bubblemaps.

These operations form a complete闭环 (closed loop) with this Polymarket incident: first, gather traffic with controversial statements and lifestyle, then directly extract funds from fans' wallets through prediction markets or meme coins. Whether it's luxury cars and mansions or meme coin issuance, the essence is the same monetization logic—converting personal fame into quantifiable cash flow.

This exposé once again reminds the crypto industry that prediction markets and the meme coin ecosystem under celebrity influence still have significant governance gaps. This incident points directly to structural deficiencies in Polymarket's market creation review process. For example, markets like 'Andrew Tate's Weekly Tweet Count' are created without effective门槛 (thresholds) to verify whether the market has objectivity or is susceptible to manipulation risk. The core value of prediction markets lies in aggregating分散 (dispersed) information for price discovery, but when the subject is entirely controlled by a single entity, information asymmetry is放大至极端 (amplified to an extreme). Tate could simply adjust his tweet frequency to influence market outcomes, while retail investors bet based on public information, unaware of the internal manipulation.

Previously, the author wrote an article titled 'He Made $300,000 Counting Musk's Tweets'. The prediction market tracked Elon Musk's tweet count; Musk himself is the world's richest man, a hard tech entrepreneur with no motive to profit from insider trading, while Andrew Tate might not be. Polymarket currently does not allow any individual user to directly create prediction markets. All markets are ultimately created by Polymarket's market team. If Polymarket does not strengthen market审查 (review), similar allegations are likely to continue to发酵 (ferment).

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7618832

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Andrew Tate accused of doing on Polymarket according to the article?

AAndrew Tate is accused of engaging in insider trading on Polymarket by manipulating prediction markets related to the number of his own tweets. He allegedly controlled at least 7 Polymarket accounts to profit from these markets, earning a total of $52,286.

QHow did the exposé by user @Euanker provide evidence of Tate's alleged manipulation?

A@Euanker provided detailed on-chain evidence and profit charts showing that the 7 Polymarket accounts had identical deposit paths, funding sources from exchanges like Duelbits and Bybit, and a unified pattern of fund flow that ultimately led to a Gnosis Safe wallet controlled by Tate.

QWhat is the significance of the 'weekly tweet count prediction' markets in this case?

AThe 'weekly tweet count prediction' markets were significant because they were based entirely on Andrew Tate's own behavior, allowing him to manipulate the outcome by controlling the number of tweets he posted, thus creating an unfair advantage and profiting from insider knowledge.

QHow does this incident highlight a potential issue with Polymarket's governance?

AThe incident exposes a structural weakness in Polymarket's market creation and review process, as markets dependent on a single individual's actions lack objectivity and are susceptible to manipulation, undermining the platform's core purpose of price discovery through dispersed information.

QWhat other methods has Andrew Tate used to monetize his influence, as mentioned in the article?

AAndrew Tate has monetized his influence through luxury lifestyle branding, paid online courses like Hustler's University, and by promoting and issuing meme coins such as the DADDY series, leveraging his fan base for financial gain.

Leituras Relacionadas

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

The AI employee Viktor, developed by a team with DeepMind background, has achieved $20 million in annual revenue without a traditional sales team, serving over 30,000 companies. Its core innovation lies in positioning itself as a "Tier 3 AI Coworker" capable of "end-to-end execution and delivery of results," moving beyond the "draft and wait for human completion" model of typical AI assistants. Users can simply mention Viktor in Slack or Microsoft Teams using natural language commands, and it autonomously performs tasks like pulling sales data from a CRM, generating reports, or even cross-tool operations like creating board meeting PPTs by aggregating data from six different sources. Key to its growth is a pure Product-Led Growth (PLG) model, eliminating complex implementation cycles and per-seat licensing. Instead, it charges based on task credits or consumption, lowering the trial barrier with a $100 free credit offer and no credit card required. This enabled viral, bottom-up adoption within organizations. Viktor's interaction paradigm removes the barrier of prompt engineering, allowing non-technical employees to delegate complex workflows seamlessly. It also features proactive, automated task execution (e.g., overnight bookkeeping, scheduled reports) based on triggers, effectively embedding AI as an automated "process layer" within business operations. However, its expansion into Microsoft Teams—a platform with 320 million users—highlights challenges. Large enterprises require stringent IT compliance, security reviews (e.g., SOC 2), and governance, potentially hindering the frictionless, user-driven adoption that succeeded in Slack. Additionally, the "black box" nature of its autonomous decision-making raises concerns about operational risks, data integrity, and the need for robust audit logs and permission controls. Balancing efficiency gains with security and trust remains a critical hurdle for Viktor and similar AI agents aiming to become core enterprise infrastructure.

marsbitHá 6m

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

marsbitHá 6m

Interview with CoreWeave Co-founders: AI Demand Seems to 'Intensify' Every Day

An Interview with CoreWeave Executives: AI Demand Seems to 'Intensify' Every Day In an interview, CoreWeave executives highlight a structural shift in AI infrastructure demand. While GPU availability remains crucial, the primary bottlenecks are evolving to include powered data center shells, skilled labor (like electricians), and complex supply chain execution. They note that AI demand, particularly for agentic AI and reasoning models, continues to intensify daily, accelerating since Q1 2024. This demand is driving a need for more balanced infrastructure. CoreWeave is redesigning data centers to allocate more space for storage and CPUs alongside GPUs, with significant interest in Nvidia's upcoming Vera CPUs. The company, serving top AI labs and hyperscalers, emphasizes its client-driven model, building precisely to customer specifications. CoreWeave attributes its competitive edge to proven execution, performance, and a mature platform for AI deployment. Pricing is structured to pass component cost increases (e.g., for HBM memory) to customers, protecting margins. Looking ahead, they anticipate Vera Rubin platform deployments to begin meaningfully in late 2025, with a major ramp throughout 2027, mirroring the Blackwell (GB) series rollout pattern. The competition is shifting from merely acquiring chips to holistic engineering and delivery capability.

marsbitHá 23m

Interview with CoreWeave Co-founders: AI Demand Seems to 'Intensify' Every Day

marsbitHá 23m

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

According to a report by The Information, early Chinese investors of Manus, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China, and ZhenFund, are planning to repurchase the company from Meta for $2 billion—the same price Meta paid in its acquisition last December. This move is a direct response to the Chinese government's prohibition of the foreign acquisition in April. As part of the repurchase plan, Manus is considering establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture within China. This structure is seen as a way to ensure regulatory compliance for its Chinese investors and to pave the way for a future IPO in Hong Kong. Notably, U.S. investor Benchmark will not participate in the buyback, which will concentrate ownership even more among Chinese capital. Since its acquisition by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly, with its annualized revenue run rate reportedly increasing four-to-fivefold to $400-$500 million in roughly six months. This strong growth underpins the investors' willingness to repurchase at the original price. Financially, the forced unwinding of the deal may benefit the early investors, allowing them to regain equity at a cost far below the company's current implied valuation, with the added prospect of an independent future listing. However, specific terms of the repurchase, including funding proportions and the joint venture's equity structure, are still under negotiation. This "repurchase-joint venture-Hong Kong IPO" approach could serve as a reference model for other Chinese AI startups navigating cross-border M&A regulations.

marsbitHá 33m

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

marsbitHá 33m

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

The article discusses the significant and concerning depegging of MicroStrategy's (MSTR) preferred stock, STRC. Designed to trade near its $100 target par value, STRC has recently fallen sharply, reaching a low of $83.26 and closing at $88.59, representing an over 11% discount. STRC is a core component of MicroStrategy's financial strategy. As a perpetual preferred stock, it allows the company to raise capital through an "at-the-market" (ATM) issuance program without diluting common shareholders (MSTR). This capital is primarily used to purchase Bitcoin, creating a "capital flywheel": issuing STRC → raising cash → buying BTC → increasing net assets → supporting STRC's value. The flywheel's operation depends on STRC maintaining its $100 price. To enforce this, MicroStrategy employs a dynamic dividend mechanism, recently raising the rate to 11.5% and increasing payout frequency. However, this has failed to halt the depegging, indicating market concerns extend beyond yield. Analysts cite two main reasons. First, technical factors like forced liquidations from leveraged arbitrage trades may have exacerbated the sell-off. Second, and more fundamentally, is waning confidence in MicroStrategy's financial resilience. A JPMorgan report highlighted the company's limited cash relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation, raising liquidity concerns. While MicroStrategy counters that its massive Bitcoin holdings provide decades of coverage, this argument relies on the potential need to sell BTC—a departure from its long-standing "never sell" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of Bitcoin for "testing," despite being framed as minor, has intensified these fears. The persistent depegging threatens to cripple MicroStrategy's primary funding channel. If STRC remains discounted, the company's ability to fund further Bitcoin purchases weakens. Should cash reserves dwindle while financing is constrained, the market may increasingly price in the risk of MicroStrategy becoming a forced seller of Bitcoin to meet obligations. This shift from a major marginal buyer to a potential seller could pose significant downside risk to the broader Bitcoin market.

链捕手Há 41m

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

链捕手Há 41m

Altcoins Face Deepest Spot Sell Pressure Since 2020, CryptoQuant Data Shows

Altcoins are enduring one of their most severe periods of spot-market selling pressure since 2020, according to CryptoQuant data, with a cumulative buy/sell volume gap of roughly $209 billion. This reflects weak retail demand, a rotation into safer assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoin yield products, and broad investor caution. While such extreme selling can set the stage for a contrarian opportunity by showing one-sided positioning, the data does not yet signal an immediate reversal or altcoin season. The market remains in a defensive state, lacking the sustained spot accumulation and broad sector improvement needed for a confirmed bullish turn.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Altcoins Face Deepest Spot Sell Pressure Since 2020, CryptoQuant Data Shows