SEC Promotes Tokenized Stocks, Is the Traditional Finance Industry Starting to Worry?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-22Última atualização em 2026-05-22

Resumo

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing to formally release an "innovation exemption" framework this week. This framework would allow third parties to tokenize U.S. stocks like Apple and Tesla without approval from the listed companies. The move, rooted in a deregulatory vision proposed by pro-crypto commissioners earlier this year, could accelerate the migration of traditional stock markets to blockchain. This development poses a structural threat of "fragmentation" to traditional finance. Core concerns are liquidity fragmentation—where trading volume disperses across multiple blockchains and platforms, leading to price disparities and reduced market efficiency—and revenue fragmentation—where trading fees and intermediary income shift away from domestic exchanges to overseas or competing platforms. The report compares the traditional stock market to a monopolistic "supermarket." Tokenization enables countless "street stalls" to operate outside this system, threatening the exchange's dominance, diluting liquidity for large orders, and slicing into revenue streams. Evidence of this capital fragmentation is already emerging. On the same day the SEC signaled the framework, decentralized platform Hyperliquid saw its RWA (real-world asset) open interest hit a record $2.6 billion, driven by demand for 24/7 on-chain trading of traditional assets. Traditional institutions face a dilemma: either collaborate to build tokenization infrastructure proactively or...

Author: Tiger Research

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing to formally announce an "innovation exemption" framework this week, which will allow third parties to tokenize U.S. stocks like Apple and Tesla without approval from the listed companies. This move could accelerate the migration of traditional stock markets to blockchain, while also raising deep concerns among exchanges about liquidity fragmentation and revenue loss.

According to a Bloomberg report on May 18, this framework originates from the deregulation vision proposed by pro-crypto commissioners Paul Atkins and Hester Peirce in February. Coinbase and the Blockchain Association had previously submitted formal letters of support, strongly advocating for granting third parties the right to tokenize. However, the guidance issued by Peirce on May 22 is narrower in scope than market expectations, applying only to on-chain stock instruments that fully retain shareholder rights and explicitly excluding synthetic stock tokens that do not carry voting or dividend rights.

Two Core Threats: Liquidity Fragmentation and Revenue Fragmentation

The core impact of tokenized stocks lies in "fragmentation." While the crypto industry often discusses liquidity aggregation, the traditional finance world views it as a structural threat.

  • Liquidity Fragmentation: When the same stock is tokenized on different blockchains and decentralized platforms, the trading volume and order flow originally concentrated on the NYSE or Nasdaq will disperse across multiple venues. This will lead to price disparities between platforms, increased slippage for large orders, and reduced overall market efficiency.
  • Revenue Fragmentation: With the dispersion of trading venues, transaction fees and intermediary revenues that originally belonged to domestic exchanges will flow to overseas or competing platforms, directly impacting national financial competitiveness.

A Tiger Research report uses South Korea as an example: The SK Hynix 2x Leveraged ETF launched by Hong Kong asset manager CSOP has grown into the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF, with assets exceeding 110 billion won (approximately $80 billion). If South Korea could have taken the lead in launching similar products through regulatory sandboxes, these management fees and financial revenues could have stayed within the country.

The End of Traditional Exchanges' "Supermarket" Monopoly

The report uses a vivid metaphor to describe this change: the traditional stock market is like a dominant supermarket where all buyers and sellers are concentrated, and the exchange monopolizes transactions and collects fees. Tokenized stocks are akin to allowing anyone to set up thousands of street stalls without permission, conducting trades directly outside the supermarket.

This dispersion will lead to buyer loss, thinner inventory at each stall, difficulty in executing large trades, and the slicing up of revenue sources. If domestic exchanges hesitate due to regulatory constraints, competing platforms in other jurisdictions will rush to seize global capital flows and intermediary revenues.

Capital Fragmentation Is Already Happening

On the same day the SEC signaled the framework (May 18), the open interest for RWAs (Real World Assets) on the decentralized platform Hyperliquid surpassed $2.6 billion, reaching a record high. Driven by the demand for 24/7 on-chain trading of traditional assets, RWA trading volume on perpetual DEXs is expected to surge further.

Traditional financial institutions and regulators face a dilemma: one option is to proactively build tokenization infrastructure through cooperation, like the NYSE; the other is to lobby regulators to block innovation to protect existing revenues. Regulators are also conflicted—they must control the pace of innovation while preventing domestic revenue from being siphoned off by overseas platforms.

Even if the framework is formally announced, potential conflicts are just beginning. Future focal points will include:

  • A second "clarity war" surrounding shareholder rights;
  • How to bring platforms like Hyperliquid, which have grown in regulatory gray areas, into the regulatory system. If deemed unlicensed exchanges, this could trigger a new wave of liquidity and uncertainty shocks.

In the era of digital assets, if financial institutions and jurisdictions do not act quickly, they will permanently lose their long-monopolized fee rights and financial leadership, and capital will continue to disperse in all directions.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the SEC's upcoming 'innovation exemption' framework expected to allow, according to the article?

AThe SEC's upcoming 'innovation exemption' framework is expected to allow third parties to tokenize stocks like Apple and Tesla on the blockchain without requiring approval from the companies themselves, provided the tokenized instruments fully retain shareholder rights such as voting and dividends.

QWhat are the two main 'fragmentation' threats that tokenized stocks pose to traditional finance, as outlined in the Tiger Research report?

AThe two main 'fragmentation' threats are liquidity fragmentation and revenue fragmentation. Liquidity fragmentation means trading volume spreads across multiple blockchain platforms, causing price discrepancies and higher slippage. Revenue fragmentation refers to the diversion of trading fees and intermediary income away from national exchanges to competing or foreign platforms.

QWhat example does the article use to illustrate the financial loss a country can suffer by not moving quickly with tokenized products?

AThe article uses the example of South Korea. A Hong Kong-based asset manager's leveraged ETF on SK Hynix has grown into the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF. The report suggests that if South Korea had acted faster through a regulatory sandbox, the management fees and financial revenue from such a product could have remained within the country.

QWhat platform's RWA (Real World Asset) open interest hit a record high on the same day the SEC signaled its new framework?

AOn the same day (May 18), the decentralized platform Hyperliquid saw its RWA open interest surge to a record high, exceeding $2.6 billion.

QWhat are the two strategic options traditional financial institutions and regulators face in response to tokenization, as mentioned in the article?

AThe two strategic options are: 1) To proactively build tokenization infrastructure through partnerships, similar to what the NYSE is doing. 2) To lobby regulators to block innovation in order to protect existing revenue streams.

Leituras Relacionadas

Robinhood Chain Records Largest Daily Trading Volume: $874.8 Million USD, 5.5 Million Transactions

Robinhood Chain recorded its highest daily trading volume and transaction count since its mainnet launch on July 1, with $874.8 million in DEX volume and over 5.5 million transactions. The network briefly surpassed Ethereum and Hyperliquid in application revenue, trailing only Solana. Activity followed a two-month cycle: an initial launch spike, a six-week decline to around $140 million daily in early August, and a three-week rally to new highs. The recent record was driven significantly by the permissionless token launchpad Pons.family, which alone accounted for roughly 51% ($445.98M) of the network's total volume that day. This represents a massive surge from its mid-August levels. While Uniswap Labs launched a competing, zero-fee platform (Pools.trade) in early August and briefly overtook Pons, momentum quickly shifted back. Pons's growth is partly fueled by a reflexive fee cycle, where 80% of protocol fees fund automatic token buybacks and burns, shrinking supply and attracting attention. The broader market rally, with Bitcoin surpassing $81,500 and Ethereum surging nearly 29% weekly, created fertile ground for speculative launchpad activity. Robinhood Chain's low coincided with the market bottom, and its recovery mirrored the upturn. The key question for Robinhood Chain is whether it can sustain transaction activity and volume once the current speculative frenzy on platforms like Pons subsides.

cryptonews.ruHá 3m

Robinhood Chain Records Largest Daily Trading Volume: $874.8 Million USD, 5.5 Million Transactions

cryptonews.ruHá 3m

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion

In a landmark settlement mirroring the historic 1998 tobacco case, Meta has agreed to pay up to approximately $18 billion to resolve lawsuits filed by 52 US states and territories. The lawsuits alleged that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications to hook teenagers, concealed known harms to youth mental health, and illegally collected data from children under 13. Faced with a potential $1.4 trillion claim and a series of unfavorable prior rulings, Meta chose to settle rather than risk a jury verdict. Beyond the financial penalty, the core of the 10-year agreement is a set of mandatory product changes for Instagram and Facebook. These include hard daily time limits and nighttime blocks for teen users, restrictions on notifications during school hours, hiding like counts, offering a non-algorithmic feed option, and implementing stricter age verification. An independent auditor will oversee compliance. Crucially, Meta tied 30% of the settlement amount to a condition requiring TikTok and YouTube to adopt similar restrictions and pay comparable fines, aiming to create an industry-wide standard and level the competitive playing field. Analysts compare this moment to the tobacco settlement, which fundamentally reshaped industry rules and public perception. The outcome signals a major shift in regulatory pressure on social media's core engagement models, particularly concerning minors, with ongoing lawsuits likely to target other major platforms.

marsbitHá 20m

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion

marsbitHá 20m

Trading

Spot
活动图片