SEC plans ‘token taxonomy’ for crypto assets even if CLARITY Act fails

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-05Última atualização em 2026-03-05

Resumo

U.S. regulators are advancing crypto guidelines independently of the stalled CLARITY Act. The SEC is developing a 'token taxonomy' to clarify how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, providing regulatory obligations for firms and investors. Simultaneously, the CFTC is proposing rules for prediction markets and plans to issue guidance on crypto perpetual contracts. These efforts aim to establish enforceable frameworks even without broader legislation, as bipartisan support for the CLARITY Act remains uncertain due to disputes over stablecoin regulations.

U.S regulators could still offer clear guidelines for the crypto sector even if the broader market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, fails to become law.

Notably, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has already issued interpretive guidance on how to apply federal securities law to certain crypto assets.

The guidance is under White House review, with Bloomberg reporting that it will establish a ‘token taxonomy’ to help categorize crypto assets that fall under SEC jurisdiction.

An SEC spokesperson further clarified that,

“As Chairman Atkins said, the Commission will consider interpretive guidance around a token taxonomy for crypto assets – in line with market structure legislation – to ensure that investors and innovators have a clear understanding of their regulatory obligations.”

Worth noting that this is separate from the SEC’s pending rulemaking proposal on crypto asset offerings.

For ETF Prime’s Nate Geraci, the move would be net positive, especially if the CLARITY Act stalls.

“CLARITY Act would be better, but SEC apparently not waiting around for politicians to figure out how to classify crypto assets...”

Such regulatory clarity would establish an enforceable framework that allows crypto firms to register with the regulator, conduct disclosure requirements, and engage with investors, amongst other things.

In fact, some analysts who viewed the CLARITY Act as a ‘bad bill’ advocated for this route to safeguard the market.

CFTC pushes for prediction market rules

Separately, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which handles derivatives trading, has pledged to unveil clear rules for booming prediction markets.

Like the SEC, the CFTC also submitted a proposal for rulemaking for the multi-billion-dollar prediction markets.

Besides, CFTC Chairman Mike Selig had pledged to unveil crypto perps guidelines by next month. Collectively, these regulatory moves could allow key players to operate even if the CLARITY Act fails to hit the finish line.

In fact, the bill stalled earlier in the year as the crypto and banking industries failed to reach a stablecoin yield deal.

Surprisingly, the White House has openly criticized banks for their hardline stance on stablecoin rewards and sided with the crypto industry. The ongoing rift could make it challenging to have full bipartisan support to advance the bill.

Even so, the current pro-crypto regulators may still offer the much-needed guidelines for players to operate with clear rules for the road.


Final Summary

  • The SEC submitted proposed guidelines on how to treat crypto assets that fall within federal securities law.
  • CFTC also pushed for rules for prediction markets, with experts billing the updates as ‘better’ if the CLARITY Act stalls.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the SEC planning to establish for crypto assets, even if the CLARITY Act fails?

AThe SEC is planning to establish a 'token taxonomy' to help categorize crypto assets that fall under its jurisdiction.

QWhich U.S. regulatory body has pledged to unveil clear rules for prediction markets?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has pledged to unveil clear rules for prediction markets.

QWhat did the CFTC Chairman pledge to release by next month regarding crypto?

ACFTC Chairman Mike Selig pledged to unveil crypto perps (perpetuals) guidelines by next month.

QWhy did the CLARITY Act stall earlier in the year?

AThe CLARITY Act stalled because the crypto and banking industries failed to reach a stablecoin yield deal.

QAccording to the article, what would regulatory clarity from the SEC establish for crypto firms?

ARegulatory clarity would establish an enforceable framework that allows crypto firms to register with the regulator, conduct disclosure requirements, and engage with investors.

Leituras Relacionadas

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手Há 7m

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手Há 7m

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbitHá 38m

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbitHá 38m

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbitHá 1h

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片