SEC Chairman Explains Why NFTs Are Not Securities: 'Like Buying Trading Cards'

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-19Última atualização em 2026-03-19

Resumo

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins explained in a CNBC interview why NFTs are generally not considered securities, comparing them to collectibles like baseball cards. The SEC recently issued guidance identifying four categories of digital assets not classified as securities: digital commodities, digital tools, digital collectibles (including NFTs), and stablecoins. Atkins emphasized that NFTs are typically "bought and held" assets rather than investment contracts, which are central to the definition of a security. He noted that each asset is evaluated based on its specific facts and circumstances, but digital collectibles are generally viewed as immutable purchases not intended for trading like traditional securities. This reflects a broader shift in the SEC’s approach under Atkins’ leadership, moving away from enforcement-driven regulation toward clearer guidance and a more predictable framework. The change aligns with the Trump administration's crypto-friendly stance, with Atkins criticizing past regulatory missteps that he believes set the U.S. back in crypto innovation.

Author: Sam Bourgi

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: SEC Chairman Paul Atkins further explained in a CNBC interview why NFTs generally do not constitute securities. The SEC recently released an interpretive document listing four categories of digital assets that are not securities: digital commodities, digital instruments, digital collectibles (including NFTs), and stablecoins.

Atkins compared NFTs to baseball cards, emphasizing that such assets are "bought and held" and do not involve investment contracts. This is the latest move by the SEC under Atkins' leadership to shift from "enforcement-driven" to "guidance-driven" regulation.

Full text as follows:

After the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) listed four major categories of digital assets not subject to securities laws, Chairman Paul Atkins further explained why non-fungible tokens (NFTs) generally do not meet the definition of securities.

In a CNBC interview on Wednesday, Atkins reiterated the four categories of digital assets identified in the SEC's recent interpretive document that are typically not considered securities: digital commodities, digital instruments, digital collectibles like NFTs, and stablecoins.

During the interview, host Andrew Ross Sorkin pressed the issue of digital collectibles, noting that depending on their structure, they could more easily be classified as securities.

Atkins responded, "That's true of anything." He emphasized that the SEC's analysis still depends on the specific facts and circumstances of each asset, particularly whether it involves an investment contract under long-standing legal precedent.

Atkins stated that digital collectibles are generally viewed as items to be bought and held, similar to physical collectibles, rather than investment contracts. Investment contracts are a core defining feature of securities.

He said, "These collectibles, like baseball cards, memes, memecoins, NFTs, are things someone buys. It's an immutable purchase...unlike other assets that people trade."

Caption: Paul Atkins interviewed on CNBC. Source: CNBC

SEC Continues to Move Away from "Enforcement-Driven" Crypto Policy

Under Atkins' leadership, the SEC's approach to regulating digital assets has undergone a noticeable adjustment. This shift coincides with the Trump administration, which is more crypto-friendly and took office in early 2025.

Atkins said in the CNBC interview, "We are breaking with the past." He described the SEC's efforts to promote clearer guidance and a more predictable regulatory framework.

Last year, Atkins criticized the SEC's previous reliance on "regulation by enforcement" and promised to move away from this approach. He also noted that tokenization is a key innovation that regulators should support rather than restrict.

Since then, he has repeatedly stated that past regulatory missteps have set the U.S. back by as much as a decade in crypto development and vowed to reverse this situation.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the four categories of digital assets that the SEC recently identified as typically not being considered securities?

AThe four categories are digital commodities, digital tools, digital collectibles (including NFTs), and stablecoins.

QHow did SEC Chairman Paul Atkins compare NFTs to explain why they are not securities?

AHe compared NFTs to baseball cards, stating they are 'bought and held' items, similar to physical collectibles, and do not involve investment contracts.

QWhat shift in regulatory approach has the SEC undergone under Chairman Paul Atkins' leadership?

AThe SEC has shifted from an 'enforcement-driven' approach to a 'guidance-driven' one, focusing on clearer guidance and a more predictable regulatory framework.

QAccording to the article, what did Paul Atkins say about the impact of past regulatory mistakes on the U.S. crypto industry?

AHe stated that past regulatory missteps set the U.S. back by as much as a decade in crypto development and vowed to reverse this situation.

QWhat key feature did Atkins emphasize as central to the definition of a security in the context of digital assets?

AHe emphasized that the key feature is whether the asset involves an investment contract under long-standing legal precedent.

Leituras Relacionadas

Wall Street Morning Report: AI + Cloud Computing Takes Over the Market Again, Amazon Knocks on the Door of $3 Trillion

Wall Street's August began with a strong rally, driven by easing Middle East tensions as President Trump signaled progress on U.S.-Iran talks, prompting a sharp drop in oil prices. Major indices hit record or near-record highs, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 1.32%, the Nasdaq Composite surging 2.13%, and the S&P 500 rising 1.48%. The energy sector was the sole decliner. The AI and cloud computing narrative dominated the tech rally. The "Magnificent Seven" index jumped 3.6%. Amazon's market cap surpassed $3 trillion for the first time following robust AWS results, while Nvidia regained a $5 trillion valuation. Meta, Google, and Microsoft also posted significant gains. Other AI-related stocks like Palantir, CoreWeave, and various semiconductor and infrastructure companies saw strong advances. In other markets, gold held above $4,000, supported by central bank buying. Treasury yields fell as oil prices dropped. The U.S. dollar remained stable despite strong manufacturing data. Japan's substantial currency intervention raised concerns, but U.S. officials reassured markets about the mechanism used. Key events ahead include major industry conferences (Ai4 2026, FMS Summit) and earnings reports from companies like SpaceX, AMD, and Pfizer. The White House is also set to host a meeting with leading AI firms to discuss regulatory frameworks.

marsbitHá 11m

Wall Street Morning Report: AI + Cloud Computing Takes Over the Market Again, Amazon Knocks on the Door of $3 Trillion

marsbitHá 11m

The July Tech Stock Pullback: Which Funds Are Paying the Price for Buying High?

In July, China's technology stocks experienced a sharp correction, causing significant pain for actively managed mutual funds that aggressively increased their holdings in the sector during the second quarter. The sell-off saw major indices like the ChiNext and STAR 50 fall over 25% and 28% for the month, respectively. Funds that piled into tech at its June peak faced steep losses. Notably, several veteran "value investor" fund managers, known for long-term holdings in consumer staples, made dramatic shifts. Star managers like Zhang Kun (E Fund Blue Chip Selected) and Liu Yanchun (Invesco Great Wall Dingyi) drastically reduced positions in liquor stocks like Kweichow Moutai, switching instead to semiconductor and AI hardware companies like SMIC and Ingenic International. Data shows active equity funds' allocation to the electronics sector reached a historical high of 42.64% by end-Q2. Around 67 funds saw their TMT (Technology, Media, Telecom) weighting surge from an average of 6.75% to 54.99%. The consequences were severe in July: these high-TMT funds fell an average of over 20%, with 12 plunging more than 40%. Examples include Jinhua High-Quality Growth and Guoshou Anbao Wenhui, which fell 26.34% and nearly 40% respectively after raising TMT weights above 70%. The article also highlights issues of "style drift," where funds with names like "high-dividend" held high-P/E tech stocks instead, confusing investors. Newly launched funds suffered even more. For instance, Guotai Haitong New Energy RuiXuan Hybrid, launched in mid-June, saw its net asset value plummet to 0.5509 yuan by July 30, a loss of nearly 45%. Analysts note the extreme sector concentration mirrored past bubbles (e.g., 2021 new energy). The intense, crowded trade itself became a major risk. While tech stocks rebounded sharply on July 31, the funds that chased the high face a longer-term market test.

marsbitHá 26m

The July Tech Stock Pullback: Which Funds Are Paying the Price for Buying High?

marsbitHá 26m

Dalio's Warning: AI Bubble Is Here, Gold Is the Hard Asset

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the AI sector is currently in a bubble, drawing parallels to historical examples like the 1929 crash and the dot-com bubble. He explains that revolutionary new technologies lead to excessive excitement and investment, often with investors ignoring price fundamentals and taking on debt, which ultimately creates unsustainable asset valuations. Dalio outlines three key signs that a bubble is about to burst: 1) Rising interest rates, which force asset sales for liquidity. 2) A significant increase in stock supply as companies issue more shares. 3) A shift in ownership from steadfast institutional investors to less knowledgeable, often leveraged, retail investors. To navigate the potential downturn, he strongly advocates for a diversified investment portfolio, criticizing cash as a poor long-term store of value due to inflation. He specifically recommends allocating 5-15% of a portfolio to gold, which he views as a unique "hard asset" and an effective hedge because it is no one else's liability. In contrast, he is skeptical of Bitcoin as "digital gold," citing potential vulnerabilities to future technologies like quantum computing and government intervention. Regarding the AI revolution, Dalio believes the primary beneficiaries will be capitalists who own the automating technology, potentially exacerbating wealth inequality as machines replace both physical and increasingly complex cognitive labor. However, he concludes that humans with exceptional intelligence and strong collaborative skills will continue to thrive by leveraging uniquely human traits like emotion and intuition that AI cannot replicate. Finally, touching on his theory of long-term cycles, Dalio suggests the world is currently approaching a significant inflection point in an approximate 80-year cycle of changing world orders.

marsbitHá 55m

Dalio's Warning: AI Bubble Is Here, Gold Is the Hard Asset

marsbitHá 55m

On the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report, Wall Street Shows Major Divergence in CRCL Valuation

On the eve of Circle (CRCL) releasing its quarterly earnings report, Wall Street analysts are deeply divided over the company's valuation. Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight," slashing its price target from $106 to $38. Analyst James Faucette argues the market overestimates the growth potential of Circle's core USDC stablecoin, noting its circulation hasn't increased since Q3 2025 and new use cases beyond remittances and card spending are limited. He warns that slowing USDC growth could pressure the crucial "reserve income" and shift revenue toward lower-margin transaction fees. In stark contrast, TD Cowen initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and an $82 price target. Analyst Bryan Bergin believes the market underestimates Circle's potential to evolve from a stablecoin issuer into a broader digital financial infrastructure platform. He forecasts a ~31% annual growth rate for USDC through 2030 and expects faster growth in fee-based revenue from services like payments, RWA tokenization, and its Arc network. A key external factor adding uncertainty is the stalled progress of the CLARITY Act in the US Senate, whose delay could dampen institutional adoption expectations for stablecoins. The core disagreement lies in whether Circle's future hinges on USDC circulation growth or a successful platform-based transformation. The upcoming earnings report is keenly awaited for insights into reserve income trends and the progress of newer business verticals.

marsbitHá 2h

On the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report, Wall Street Shows Major Divergence in CRCL Valuation

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片