SEC and CFTC signal execution phase for crypto regulation at harmonization meeting

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-29Última atualização em 2026-01-29

Resumo

US financial regulators, the SEC and CFTC, have announced a shift from coordination to execution in crypto regulation. At a harmonization meeting, officials outlined plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority, without waiting for final legislation from Congress. A key initiative, "Project Crypto," aims to create a shared taxonomy for crypto assets, clarify jurisdictional boundaries, and reduce regulatory duplication and uncertainty. The CFTC stated that most crypto assets are not securities, marking a departure from past ambiguity. Planned rulemaking covers tokenized collateral, onshore crypto perpetual derivatives, retail leveraged trading, and treatment of software in DeFi. The goal is to provide regulatory clarity and reduce friction while maintaining market integrity.

US financial regulators signalled a shift from coordination to execution on crypto oversight on Thursday, 29 January.

Senior officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] outlined plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority.

The remarks came during a rescheduled SEC–CFTC harmonization meeting, where both agencies emphasised regulatory clarity, reduced duplication, and a more coordinated approach to overseeing crypto asset markets.

Regulators move beyond coordination rhetoric

Speaking at the event, Michael S. Selig said the CFTC would begin exercising oversight of the crypto market without waiting for Congress to finalize market structure legislation.

He described the moment as a transition toward implementation. Staff have been directed to draft rules and revisit existing proposals that have contributed to regulatory uncertainty.

Selig said the CFTC would work jointly with the SEC on “Project Crypto.” This is a framework aimed at harmonizing oversight across agencies.

The initiative is designed to establish a shared crypto asset taxonomy. Also, it is to clarify jurisdictional boundaries and reduce overlapping compliance requirements.

Joint taxonomy and jurisdictional clarity

A central focus of the meeting was developing a common classification framework for digital assets. Selig said he agreed with Paul S. Atkins that most crypto assets trading today are not securities.

This position would mark a departure from years of regulatory ambiguity.

Selig added that CFTC staff have been instructed to work with their SEC counterparts on the joint codification of a crypto asset taxonomy as an interim measure. At the same time, Congress continues to work on broader legislation.

The aim, he said, is to draw clearer jurisdictional lines and avoid leaving market participants “trapped in uncertainty.”

Rulemaking plans span derivatives, collateral, and software

Beyond taxonomy, Selig outlined several areas where the CFTC plans to move forward with rulemaking.

These include developing rules to support the use of tokenised collateral, creating pathways to onshore perpetual crypto derivatives. Also, the rule will clarify the treatment of leveraged and margined retail crypto trading.

He also announced plans to withdraw earlier proposals that restricted certain event contracts and to begin rulemaking on prediction markets.

In addition, the CFTC will explore whether innovation exemptions or safe harbours are appropriate for software developers and non-custodial systems operating in the decentralized finance space.

Harmonization aimed at reducing regulatory friction

Both agencies framed harmonization as a practical exercise rather than a blurring of statutory boundaries.

Selig said substituted compliance and aligned requirements could allow firms to operate more efficiently without compromising market integrity. This is particularly as crypto markets span products traditionally overseen by different regulators.

While recent congressional action has advanced market structure legislation, regulators stressed that the execution phase would proceed independently, using existing authorities to modernise oversight as innovation continues.


Final Thoughts

  • US regulators signalled a move from coordination to implementation, with the SEC and CFTC outlining concrete steps toward joint crypto rulemaking.
  • Planned actions span asset classification, derivatives, tokenised collateral, and software treatment, indicating regulatory execution will move ahead of final legislation.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main shift signaled by US financial regulators regarding crypto oversight on January 29?

AUS financial regulators signaled a shift from coordination to execution on crypto oversight, with the SEC and CFTC outlining plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority.

QWhat is the name of the joint framework mentioned for harmonizing crypto oversight between the SEC and CFTC?

AThe joint framework is called 'Project Crypto', aimed at harmonizing oversight, establishing a shared crypto asset taxonomy, clarifying jurisdictional boundaries, and reducing overlapping compliance requirements.

QAccording to Michael S. Selig, what is the classification of most crypto assets trading today?

AMichael S. Selig agreed that most crypto assets trading today are not securities, which marks a departure from years of regulatory ambiguity.

QWhat are some specific areas where the CFTC plans to move forward with rulemaking?

AThe CFTC plans to develop rules for tokenised collateral, create pathways to onshore perpetual crypto derivatives, clarify treatment of leveraged and margined retail crypto trading, withdraw earlier proposals restricting certain event contracts, and begin rulemaking on prediction markets.

QHow do the agencies view harmonization in the context of crypto regulation?

ABoth agencies framed harmonization as a practical exercise aimed at reducing regulatory friction, allowing firms to operate more efficiently without compromising market integrity, through substituted compliance and aligned requirements.

Leituras Relacionadas

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbitHá 5h

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbitHá 5h

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手Há 5h

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手Há 5h

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbitHá 5h

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片