Russia Advances Bill To Regulate Crypto Market, Eyes July 1st Implementation

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-04-23Última atualização em 2026-04-23

Resumo

Russia has advanced a key crypto bill, "On Digital Currency and Digital Rights," through its first parliamentary reading, aiming to establish a regulatory framework by July 1, 2026. The legislation recognizes digital assets as property and grants the Central Bank of Russia authority to license and oversee the market, permitting only licensed entities like exchanges and brokers to operate. It prohibits using crypto for domestic payments but allows it for cross-border settlements to bypass sanctions. The bill also introduces investor protection measures, including annual purchase limits for non-qualified investors and stricter oversight of mining activities.

Russia has advanced a key crypto bill on its first reading, as part of its efforts to establish a framework and fully bring the digital assets market out of the shadows in the next few months.

Russia Moves To Regulate Crypto Market By Summer

On Tuesday, the State Duma, the lower house of Russia’s legislature, advanced a key bill to legalize cryptocurrencies and establish a framework to regulate the digital assets in the country’s market.

According to the state news agency TASS, lawmakers passed the bill “On Digital Currency and Digital Rights” on its first reading, with 327 deputies voting in favor. The Russian government first introduced the draft in December 2025, seeking to establish the regulatory framework by summer 2026.

After clearing its first review, the bill still needs to clear the second and third readings in the State Duma. Then, it would proceed to the Federation Council, the upper chamber of the Federal Assembly, for consideration before reaching the President’s desk for signature. If passed, the bill will take effect on July 1, 2026, except for provisions with different effective dates, TASS reported.

The draft will recognize digital assets as property and grant the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) the authority to license, regulate, and oversee the local crypto market. Under the proposed legislation, only licensed professional participants supervised by the Bank of Russia will be allowed into the market.

“No anonymous exchanges or ‘black’ brokers. Exchanges, brokers, and depositories will receive licenses, and the Central Bank will monitor compliance. Transactions conducted through underground platforms will automatically be at risk of being blocked and of losing funds,” Kaplan Panesh, deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Budget and Taxes, explained.

The bill also defines the entities authorized to facilitate the circulation of crypto assets in the country, including exchanges, brokers, trust managers, and digital depositories holding the relevant licenses from the central bank.

The proposed draft establishes rules and requirements for authorized entities, and a simplified access procedure for entities already operating under the CBR’s experimental legal regime. It also introduces a simplified procedure for banks and brokers wanting to dive into crypto.

Discussing the regulation of crypto mining activities using Russian information infrastructure facilities, the deputy highlighted that “It is now a legal activity, but with clear rules: the use of only Russian infrastructure, and the reporting of equipment and currency produced.”

Digital Assets Allowed For Cross-Border Settlements

Notably, the bill will prohibit the use of crypto for paying for goods, services, or labor within the country, the report noted. However, it will allow its use for cross-border settlements to bypass sanctions restrictions.

“We have a national currency—the ruble—and it must remain the sole legal tender,” Deputy Panesh emphasized. “But we are making an exception for foreign trade. This allows Russian companies to settle accounts with foreign counterparties using cryptocurrency, bypassing sanctions restrictions. In effect, we are creating a legal instrument for cross-border settlements.”

The legislation will also introduce a tiered system that would limit the investor’s access depending on classification, aiming to “protect ordinary people from losing all their savings in a volatile market.”

As Bitcoinist previously reported, non-qualified investors would be limited to purchasing up to 300,000 rubles annually, worth around $3,800, in the most liquid cryptocurrencies after passing a knowledge test. Meanwhile, qualified investors would be able to purchase unlimited amounts of any digital asset after passing a risk-awareness test.

Panesh noted that the digital asset market in Russia has been in a gray area for years, creating risks for both citizens and the economy, adding that the legislation marks a crucial step for the local market.

“Now we are clearly defining: digital currency is property. This means it can be defended in court, included in the bankruptcy estate, and taken into account in divorce proceedings. This is a crucial step for the legal protection of millions of people who already own such assets,” he concluded.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $78,955 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the crypto bill advanced by Russia's State Duma?

AThe main purpose of the bill is to legalize cryptocurrencies and establish a regulatory framework to bring the digital assets market out of the shadows, recognizing crypto as property and granting the Central Bank of Russia authority to license, regulate, and oversee the market.

QBy what date is the bill expected to take effect if passed, and what is one key exception to this date?

AThe bill is expected to take effect on July 1, 2026, except for provisions that have different effective dates.

QHow does the bill propose to regulate the use of cryptocurrency for payments within Russia and for international trade?

AThe bill prohibits the use of cryptocurrency for paying for goods, services, or labor within Russia, but allows its use for cross-border settlements to bypass sanctions restrictions in foreign trade.

QWhat are the investment limits for non-qualified investors under the proposed tiered system?

ANon-qualified investors would be limited to purchasing up to 300,000 rubles (approximately $3,800) annually in the most liquid cryptocurrencies after passing a knowledge test.

QWhich government body will be granted the authority to license and oversee the local crypto market according to the bill?

AThe Central Bank of Russia (CBR) will be granted the authority to license, regulate, and oversee the local crypto market.

Leituras Relacionadas

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHá 7m

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbitHá 7m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHá 14m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHá 14m

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbitHá 26m

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbitHá 26m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片