RIVER price prediction: Why its next move hinges on liquidity at $25

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-14Última atualização em 2026-02-14

Resumo

RIVER's price recently hit $24.2 but has since, dropping 18.9% to $19.62. Despite a bearish daily structure and strong capital outflows (CMF at -0.36), the token saw a 55% gain over the past week. Key liquidity zones are identified at $15 and $25, with further clusters at $33 and $37.7. While short-term upward movement toward these levels is possible due to recent momentum and untapped imbalances, the overall trend remains cautious. Traders are warned of potential selling pressure near these supply zones, especially given the asset's extreme volatility and signs of holders selling during rallies.

Earlier this week, AMBCrypto reported that River [RIVER] could see further short-term gains. The cross-chain liquidity protocol’s token reached $23, as AMBCrypto forecast, but there was potential for more short-term gains.

After reaching a high of $24.2 on Thursday, the 12th of February, RIVER has receded by 18.9% to $19.62. However, this brush of the $24 supply zone was an interesting development for traders.

The short-term bullish case for RIVER

The 1-day swing structure was bearish. The $16.1 swing low had been breached, and the longer-term bias was now bearish. This timeframe’s MACD fell below the zero line to signal downward momentum over the past two weeks.

The CMF was at an extremely low value of -0.36 to highlight heavy capital flows out of the market. Combined with the bearish structure, it informed traders to watch for a bearish continuation.

Yet, during its slide from all-time highs, RIVER left behind imbalances on the 1-day timeframe. Highlighted in white, these areas at $26-$33 and $35-$40 represented supply zones that are likely to get tagged in the coming days.

The liquidation heatmap showed pockets of liquidity nearby. The closest ones to the current market price were at $15 and $25, and roughly equal in the magnitude of liquidations.

Given the upward momentum that RIVER has exhibited over the past week with its 55.2% bounce, it was possible that the move would extend higher. Beyond $25, the $33 and $37.7 levels were also notable liquidity clusters.

Traders, watch out for a rejection

Strong capital outflows, as highlighted by the CMF, demand attention. Although last week’s gains turned the lower‐timeframe structure and momentum bullish, that strength may not last.

Traders should treat the imbalances and magnetic zones overhead as supply areas where selling pressure on RIVER is likely to emerge.

Final Thoughts

  • River has rallied 55% in a week, but the volume indicator warned of holders selling into the rally.
  • It was risky to buy this extremely volatile asset, which rallied 660% in under three weeks and retraced the entire move a week later.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current price of RIVER and what was its recent high?

AThe current price of RIVER is $19.62, and its recent high was $24.2 on the 12th of February.

QAccording to the article, what are the two key liquidity levels that RIVER's next move hinges on?

AThe two key liquidity levels are at $15 and $25.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) value of -0.36 indicate for the RIVER market?

AA CMF value of -0.36 indicates heavy capital outflows from the RIVER market.

QWhat potential supply zones, left behind as imbalances, does the article suggest RIVER might test?

AThe article suggests RIVER might test the supply zones at $26-$33 and $35-$40.

QWhat major warning does the article give to traders considering a long position in RIVER?

AThe article warns traders that the strong capital outflows and the supply zones overhead mean that selling pressure is likely to emerge, making it a risky buy.

Leituras Relacionadas

Amidst the Volatility in the Crypto Market, Who is Buying Against the Trend?

"In a volatile crypto market downturn of Q1 2026, institutional players demonstrated divergent strategies. While Bitcoin fell over 25% and Ethereum dropped 35%, key institutions accumulated: corporate treasuries like Strategy (MicroStrategy) added over $10 billion in BTC, sovereign wealth funds like Mubadala increased IBIT holdings by 46%, and major banks launched crypto services and ETFs. Notably, 26 new crypto ETFs were filed or launched under streamlined SEC rules, including bank-led products from Morgan Stanley and BlackRock’s staking ETH ETF. VC funding saw concentration: total investment reached ~$5 billion, but deal count plummeted 49%. Three mega-deals—BVNK ($1.8B), Kalshi ($1B), and Polymarket ($600M)—accounted for half the quarter’s funding. Investment shifted from DeFi/NFTs to payments, prediction markets, and regulated CeFi infrastructure. Selling pressure came from hedge funds (e.g., Brevan Howard cut IBIT by 85%) and Bitcoin miners liquidating holdings. The U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve saw zero additions, highlighting that real buying came from corporations and sovereign funds, not governments. The institutional crypto landscape is bifurcating: long-term holders accumulate while short-term traders exit, signaling a foundation for the next cycle."

marsbitHá 24m

Amidst the Volatility in the Crypto Market, Who is Buying Against the Trend?

marsbitHá 24m

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbitHá 2h

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbitHá 2h

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbitHá 2h

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbitHá 2h

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbitHá 3h

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbitHá 3h

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbitHá 3h

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar MOVE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Movement (MOVE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Movement (MOVE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Movement (MOVE)Depois de comprar o teu Movement (MOVE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Movement (MOVE)Transaciona facilmente Movement (MOVE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

282 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar MOVE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de MOVE (MOVE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow