Ripple President Says Stablecoins Will Power Global Settlement

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-21Última atualização em 2026-01-21

Resumo

Ripple President Monica Long asserts that stablecoins are set to become the foundation of global settlement systems, rather than an alternative payment rail. She emphasizes that fiat-pegged tokens will serve as the core infrastructure for cross-border transactions, with major institutions like Visa and Stripe integrating them into payment flows. Long predicts that within five years, stablecoins will be fully integrated into global payment systems as the default settlement layer. She also highlights the crypto industry's shift from a speculative phase to a "production era," marked by increased institutional adoption and practical utility. By 2026, she expects significant crypto integration among Fortune 500 companies, including tokenized assets, on-chain treasury bills, and programmable financial instruments directly embedded into corporate workflows. This transition positions crypto as the operating layer of modern finance.

The President of Ripple, Monica Long, has mentioned in a new thread on X that stablecoins will be the base of global settlement, not an alternative rail, mounting fiat-pegged tokens as the pillar of cross-border money movement instead of just a side experiment.

She highlighted Visa, Stripe and other prominent institutions so far, hardwiring them into payment flows and recognising business-to-business transactions as the growth engine, having corporates leverage digital dollars to unlock real-time liquidity and capital efficiency.

The thesis of Long lines up with a wider post on the website of Ripple, where she mentions that within about five years, stablecoins will be completely amalgamated into global payment systems and function as the default settlement layer for holders and fintechs.

Meanwhile, other analysts mention that regulated stablecoins are increasingly being made to directly integrate into bank and card-network rails, obscuring the line between crypto infrastructure and traditional clearing systems.

The Further Forecasts

Long withstands that the industry is withdrawing completely from the speculative phase and setting its foot into what she calls a production era of crypto. She also mentions that after one of the most exciting years witnessed by crypto, the industry is going into its production era.

She has also forecasted that in this year, we will witness the institutionalisation of crypto-trusted infrastructure, and actual utility will propel banks, corporates and providers from pilots to scale.

Crypto is no longer unpredictable; it is the operating layer of modern finance, she further states in a follow-up post, speculating that about 50% of Fortune 500 companies will have some form of virtual asset exposure or a formal “DAT strategy” by this year.

She further proposes that they will comprise tokenised assets, on-chain treasury bills, stablecoins and programmable financial instruments implanted directly into corporate treasury and capital-markets workflows.

The written outlook of Long at Ripple associates these themes altogether, mentioning 2026 as a defining year in which stablecoins will power global settlement.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bhutan to Launch Sei Validator in Q1, Explores Tokenization Ties

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat does Ripple's President, Monica Long, predict will be the foundation of global settlement?

AStablecoins will be the base of global settlement, not an alternative rail.

QAccording to the article, what is the role of stablecoins in the future of cross-border money movement?

AStablecoins will be the pillar of cross-border money movement, not just a side experiment.

QWhat does Monica Long call the new phase that the crypto industry is entering?

AShe calls it the 'production era' of crypto, moving away from the speculative phase.

QWhat percentage of Fortune 500 companies does Long speculate will have some form of virtual asset exposure by this year?

AAbout 50% of Fortune 500 companies will have some form of virtual asset exposure or a formal 'DAT strategy'.

QWhat year does the Ripple outlook mention as a defining year for stablecoins powering global settlement?

A2026 is mentioned as a defining year in which stablecoins will power global settlement.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 12m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 12m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHá 20m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHá 20m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHá 24m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHá 24m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 31m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 31m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 40m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think