Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, But Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

深潮Publicado em 2025-12-23Última atualização em 2025-12-23

Resumo

At the Sibos 2025 conference, Swift announced a major evolution of its financial infrastructure by integrating a blockchain-based shared ledger to support tokenized assets and enable secure, real-time, and interoperable global transactions. The new system, built on Consensys' Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea, uses zk-EVM rollup technology to reduce costs and settlement times while meeting banking security standards. Over 30 major banks, including JPMorgan and Citibank, are participating in the pilot. The article reflects on Ripple’s long-standing effort to challenge traditional cross-border payments using XRP and RippleNet, which has seen adoption in retail and corporate remittances despite earlier regulatory challenges. However, Swift’s move represents a broader and more systemic shift. Unlike Ripple’s XRP-dependent model, Swift’s ledger is asset-agnostic, supporting CBDCs, stablecoins, and fiat currencies, and leverages its existing network of over 11,000 institutions. This transition marks a convergence of traditional and decentralized finance, enabling 24/7 settlement, reducing reliance on pre-funded accounts, and potentially freeing up trillions in trapped capital. By adopting a neutral, interoperable, and highly scalable blockchain framework, Swift is positioned to redefine global value transfer—moving from a legacy telegraphic model to a digitally-native, mathematically-verified system.

Author: Sanqing, Foresight News

During the Sibos 2025 conference in Frankfurt, Swift's Chief Business Officer Thierry Chilosi and Standard Chartered Bank's Global Head of Transaction Banking, Michael Spiegel, discussed a major transformation in global finance. As tokenization moves from pilot programs to reality, Swift officially announced the addition of a blockchain-based shared ledger to its infrastructure, aiming to achieve trusted and interoperable digital finance on a global scale. This ledger will serve as a secure, real-time transaction record between financial institutions, using smart contracts to validate transaction sequences and execute agreed-upon rules. It is designed to complement existing systems and seamlessly bridge traditional finance with tokenized assets.

Image Source: Swift Official Website

Although Swift did not explicitly state the technical platform when initially announcing this major development to the banking industry, Consensys CEO Joe Lubin revealed at the Token2049 conference in Singapore that Swift is leveraging the Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea to build its new payment settlement platform. By adopting Linea's zk-EVM rollup technology, Swift can significantly reduce costs and latency while meeting the financial industry's stringent requirements for 24/7 real-time settlement and security. Currently, over 30 top financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citibank, are preparing to participate in the pilot of this new blockchain-based payment rail built on Linea.

Ripple's In-Depth Efforts and Current Status

Before discussing Swift, we must revisit the pioneer that challenged the old system for over a decade: Ripple.

In 2012, Ripple emerged with the XRP Ledger (XRPL), with the core goal of replacing the inefficient Swift correspondent banking model. During this period, Ripple successfully built the global payment network RippleNet, connecting over 300 financial institutions. In fragmented markets like Southeast Asia, its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service demonstrated that XRP, as a bridge currency, could reduce cross-border settlement times from several days to just 3 to 5 seconds.

By 2020, affected by the U.S. SEC lawsuit, Ripple faced a blockade and stagnation in the U.S. market due to securities allegations. However, its global scale continued to expand. By 2022, its business had reached over 40 payment markets, with total payment volume doubling to approximately $30 billion.

In 2023, Ripple saw a turning point when a court ruled that XRP itself is not a security, marking a milestone victory for Ripple and the industry.

In August 2025, with the SEC completely abandoning its appeal, the five-year legal battle came to an end. The full clarification of its status led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its official entry into mainstream institutional asset allocation portfolios.

Today, Ripple is conducting cross-border payment and receipt businesses in multiple real-world scenarios, ranging from retail remittances (To C) to enterprise-level payments (To B).

In the retail sector, Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to bridge real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia, significantly reducing the pre-funding costs for overseas workers. Santander Bank offers transparent real-time transfers to its customers through the One Pay FX app. Meanwhile, the Southeast Asian payment platform Tranglo has significantly improved the efficiency of peso and baht conversions with the support of Ripple ODL.

At the enterprise level, American Express and PNC Bank use RippleNet to optimize B2B trade settlements and international payment collection experiences.

Additionally, in national infrastructure, Ripple is collaborating with over 20 countries, including Palau, Montenegro, and Bhutan, to develop CBDC platforms, applying blockchain technology to the issuance and清算 systems of sovereign currencies.

Why Did Swift Choose Linea?

When giants in the industry布局 the Ethereum ecosystem, they have shown a high degree of consistency in their preference for Layer 2 technology: Coinbase's Base chain is built on OP Stack, while Robinhood announced earlier this year the launch of Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum technology to support the tokenization and 24/7 trading of RWA.

This preference stems from L2's ability to leverage Ethereum's security while meeting high-performance demands through a modular architecture. Swift's choice of Linea over OP or Arbitrum lies in the core difference in underlying validation logic.

OP and Arbitrum use Optimistic Rollup, which operates on the logic of assuming transactions are valid by default and only verifying them if challenged. Asset withdrawals typically require a multi-day challenge period, which is a significant time cost for financial清算追求流动性.

Linea, on the other hand, uses zk-EVM, which provides instant validity proofs mathematically. For Swift and its partner banks, which need to process massive value settlements, zk-EVM not only offers faster finality but also ensures compliance verification while protecting transaction privacy.

Swift's choice of Linea embodies the first principle of capital operation: maximizing flow velocity.

Capital will flow like a fluid from low-velocity systems (requiring large amounts of idle准备金预存 in Nostro/Vostro accounts), high-friction systems (layers of correspondent bank fees), and slow-settlement systems (settlement taking days) of the traditional telegraphic instruction era to high-velocity, low-friction, fast-settlement blockchain digital systems.

Swift processes approximately $150 trillion in global payments annually. If it can achieve atomic-level reconciliation and 24/7 real-time settlement through Linea's technology stack, it means that trillions of dollars in准备金 currently积压 in the global financial system to hedge against清算 delays will be released and reinjected into the real economy.

As Consensys CEO Joe Lubin stated at the Token 2049 conference in Singapore, this is not merely a technological upgrade but the true convergence of TradFi and DeFi, marking the global value transfer protocol's official transition from the "Telegraphic Instruction Era" to the "Mathematical Verification Era."

The Significance of Swift Embracing Blockchain

As the global financial backbone network handling approximately $150 trillion in annual transaction volume, Swift's decision to build its ledger on Linea, an Ethereum Layer 2, signifies that blockchain technology will become the heart of mainstream finance.

Swift will eliminate fragmentation between different tokenized networks through unified technical standards, breaking down the long-standing barrier between TradFi and DeFi and implanting the efficiency genes of decentralized finance into the traditional清算 system.

Through a 24/7 operational real-time shared ledger, global financial institutions will no longer be limited by the cumbersome manual reconciliation and time-zone delays of the correspondent banking model. The massive amounts of idle capital currently积压 in correspondent bank accounts to hedge against清算 risk will be effectively released. This will enable the speed of capital flow to truly match the demands of the modern economy, ushering in a new era of global value transfer that is more transparent, lower cost, and更具互操作性.

Ripple struggled for a decade to build a new city based on the XRP Ledger outside the old system. However, the scale of financial institutions it currently connects appears势单力薄 compared to Swift's存量 network, which covers over 11,000 institutions across more than 200 countries.

The core threat from Swift lies in its "asset neutrality." Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which heavily relies on XRP as a bridge currency, Swift's blockchain ledger is designed to support multiple assets, including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs.

Banks within the Swift system can achieve instant settlement by upgrading their existing rails without bearing the volatility risk of a single asset. This combination of "存量优势 (incumbent advantage) + technical compliance" is giving Ripple its most bone-chilling challenge since its inception.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core technological difference between Swift's chosen Linea and other Layer 2 solutions like Optimistic Rollups?

AThe core difference lies in the underlying verification logic. Linea uses zk-EVM (Zero-Knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine), which provides instant validity proofs for transactions. In contrast, Optimistic Rollups (like OP and Arbitrum) assume transactions are valid by default and only verify them if a challenge is issued, which introduces a multi-day withdrawal delay. For high-value financial settlements requiring speed and finality, zk-EVM's instant cryptographic verification is superior.

QHow did the resolution of Ripple's legal battle with the SEC in 2025 impact its business?

AThe resolution, with the SEC dropping its appeals in August 2025, provided full legal clarity for Ripple. This landmark victory led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its formal entry into the asset allocation lists of mainstream financial firms and solidifying its legitimacy in the market.

QWhat specific problem is Swift's new blockchain-based shared ledger designed to solve in global finance?

AIt is designed to solve the inefficiencies of the traditional correspondent banking model, including slow settlement times (taking days), high costs from intermediary fees, and the need for large amounts of pre-funded capital (Nostro/Vostro accounts) to hedge against settlement risk. The ledger enables secure, real-time, 24/7 settlement, releasing trapped capital and improving interoperability.

QWhy is Swift's approach considered a greater threat to Ripple than simply competing with its technology?

ASwift's threat stems from its 'asset neutrality' and immense existing network. Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which relies heavily on the XRP token as a bridge currency, Swift's ledger is designed to support multiple assets including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs. This allows Swift's vast network of over 11,000 banks to upgrade for instant settlement without exposure to the volatility of a single asset, leveraging its massive existing infrastructure.

QName one retail and one corporate use case where Ripple's technology is currently being implemented.

ARetail: Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to provide real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Corporate: American Express utilizes RippleNet to optimize its B2B trade settlement processes.

Leituras Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHá 3m

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHá 3m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHá 18m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHá 18m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar O

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de O1 exchange (O) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar O1 exchange (O) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu O1 exchange (O)Depois de comprar o teu O1 exchange (O), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona O1 exchange (O)Transaciona facilmente O1 exchange (O) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

167 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.29

Como comprar O

Como comprar PROS

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Pharos (PROS) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Pharos (PROS) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Pharos (PROS)Depois de comprar o teu Pharos (PROS), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Pharos (PROS)Transaciona facilmente Pharos (PROS) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

160 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.29

Como comprar PROS

O que é VERONA

I. Introdução ao Projeto VERONA é uma blockchain construída para todos, em todo o lado, através da abstração da cadeia. Utilizando a sua camada de Abstração Generalizada, a VERONA distingue-se por integrar funcionalidades complexas de blockchain, como contas, assinaturas e interoperabilidade, diretamente ao nível do protocolo. Esta abordagem permite a interação com aplicações de blockchain sem a necessidade de compreender as tecnologias subjacentes.1) Informação Básica Nome: VERONA (VERONA)III. Links Relacionados Link do site oficial: https://xion.burnt.com/ Whitepaper: https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Exploradores: https://explorer.burnt.com/ Mídias Sociais: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: A introdução ao projeto provém dos materiais publicados ou fornecidos pela equipa oficial do projeto, que é apenas para referência e não constitui aconselhamento de investimento. A HTX não se responsabiliza por quaisquer perdas diretas ou indiretas resultantes.

778 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.22

O que é VERONA

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de A (A) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片