Ripple CEO Says Clarity Act Has 90% Chance of Passing by April

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-20Última atualização em 2026-02-20

Resumo

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse estimates a 90% chance that the Clarity Act will pass through the U.S. Congress by the end of April, following recent discussions between crypto industry leaders and regulators. The bill aims to provide jurisdictional clarity by defining whether digital assets are securities or commodities, with key regulatory roles for the SEC and CFTC. While some complex issues, particularly around stablecoin regulation, remain, Garlinghouse noted that negotiations have narrowed outstanding disagreements. Passage of the act would mark a significant shift in U.S. crypto regulation, potentially encouraging greater institutional involvement by resolving long-standing legal uncertainties.

Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, stated that he thinks the Clarity Act will be passed through the U.S. Congress by the end of April. Garlinghouse estimated that there was a 90% chance of this happening, based on the recent talks in Washington. This was said during and after a meeting at the White House that was held between the leaders of the crypto industry and the banking regulators.

During an interview with Fox Business, Garlinghouse stated that stakeholders focused on the foundational aspects of the bill, such as jurisdictional clarity. The bill seeks to establish the regulatory jurisdiction of major U.S. agencies over digital assets. The bill will provide clarity on whether certain tokens qualify as securities or commodities.

Garlinghouse pointed out that many of the outstanding issues had been narrowed down after talks between the industry and the regulators. This came after several weeks of negotiations between lawmakers, the crypto industry, and Treasury officials. The stablecoin provisions were also part of the talks. The stablecoin yield provisions have made the initial versions of the bill complicated.

However, Garlinghouse also admitted that a compromise may be required to pass the legislation this spring. Other industry officials and prediction markets have also cited a narrowing timeline. Legislators are hoping to move the Clarity Act forward before the congressional recess in April. Some estimates place the chances of passage slightly lower than Garlinghouse’s estimate, but still high.

Regulatory Environment and Industry Implications

The Clarity Act aims to offer long-overdue federal regulatory clarity regarding digital asset regulation. It would provide a clearer definition of jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Industry insiders believe that regulatory clarity could encourage institutional involvement.

Lack of a clear legal framework has resulted in enforcement uncertainty and innovation stagnation for businesses. Regulations on the issuance and trading of stablecoins are some of the most contentious issues in the bill. The White House and Senate panels have been working to reconcile these differences. Passage by Congress would represent a major change in the course of U.S. crypto regulation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Metaplanet CEO Defends Disclosure Practices Amid Bitcoin Strategy Criticism

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the estimated probability that the Clarity Act will pass by the end of April, according to Ripple's CEO?

ABrad Garlinghouse estimates there is a 90% chance that the Clarity Act will be passed by the U.S. Congress by the end of April.

QWhat was the main focus of the discussions between crypto industry leaders and regulators at the White House meeting?

AThe discussions focused on the foundational aspects of the Clarity Act, particularly on establishing jurisdictional clarity for major U.S. agencies over digital assets and determining whether certain tokens qualify as securities or commodities.

QWhy does the article suggest that a compromise might be necessary for the Clarity Act to pass this spring?

AA compromise may be required due to the contentious issues within the bill, such as the regulations on the issuance and trading of stablecoins, which have made the initial versions complicated and require reconciliation of differences.

QWhat are the two major U.S. regulatory agencies that the Clarity Act seeks to define jurisdiction between for digital assets?

AThe Clarity Act seeks to provide a clearer definition of jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

QWhat potential positive outcome does the article suggest could result from providing regulatory clarity for digital assets?

AIndustry insiders believe that regulatory clarity could encourage greater institutional involvement in the crypto industry, as a clear legal framework would reduce enforcement uncertainty and help overcome innovation stagnation.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbitHá 6m

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbitHá 6m

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbitHá 10m

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbitHá 10m

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

A crypto analyst forecasts a continued Bitcoin bear market, predicting a potential price bottom around October 2026 based on a historical 400-day cycle pattern. The analysis suggests Bitcoin is currently 252 days into a bear phase that typically lasts 364-400 days, indicating another 112-148 days of downward pressure. The projected cycle low could be around $30,000, representing a more than 75% decline from recent all-time highs near $126,000. The analyst dismisses arguments that current market factors like ETFs make this cycle different, noting the pattern has held for over a decade. Another expert aligns, forecasting a bottom between $30,000-$40,000 by late Q3 or early Q4 2026 and rejecting the possibility of Bitcoin reaching $100,000 this year.

bitcoinistHá 29m

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

bitcoinistHá 29m

Hedgeye’s New Bitcoin ETF Filing Targets One Of BTC’s Biggest Problems

Hedgeye has filed for a "Hedged Bitcoin" ETF, ticker HBIT, designed to offer Bitcoin exposure with reduced volatility. The fund would hold spot Bitcoin ETFs while using an options strategy, guided by Hedgeye's proprietary "Risk Range" signals, to manage downside risk. This approach aims to provide a smoother investment experience, particularly during market downturns, but the filing notes it may also limit upside potential during strong rallies. The strategy involves buying and writing both standardized and customizable FLEX options. The registration with the SEC is pending, and the proposal represents a growing trend of crypto products focused on altering Bitcoin's risk/return profile rather than simply tracking its price.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Hedgeye’s New Bitcoin ETF Filing Targets One Of BTC’s Biggest Problems

bitcoinistHá 1h

Is Dogecoin Dead Or Could The SpaceX IPO Lead To A Revival?

Dogecoin is facing doubts about its future as its price hovers near multi-year lows and investor enthusiasm wanes. Lacking its previous narrative momentum and with modest institutional ETF inflows, it has struggled alongside the broader meme-coin downturn. However, the upcoming SpaceX IPO, seeking a massive $1.75 trillion valuation, is generating discussion as a potential catalyst. While the IPO has no direct link to Dogecoin, the event will refocus global attention on Elon Musk, whose past endorsements have significantly boosted the cryptocurrency. Some investors see this renewed spotlight as a chance for revived interest, though it remains uncertain if attention alone can drive a sustained recovery amid ongoing market challenges.

bitcoinistHá 3h

Is Dogecoin Dead Or Could The SpaceX IPO Lead To A Revival?