Rhythm Interview with OpenMind: From x402 Payments to Building the 'Android for Robots'

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-22Última atualização em 2026-01-22

Resumo

In a 2025 interview, OpenMind founder and Stanford professor Jan Liphardt discusses his vision for building the "brain" for humanoid robots, positioning it as a potential "Android for robots." Following a $20 million funding round, OpenMind has accelerated its product roadmap, launching a suite of offerings from an underlying operating system to a payment protocol. A core of OpenMind’s strategy is enabling the emerging "Machine Economy," where robots act as independent economic agents. A key development is its partnership with Circle and the implementation of the x402 protocol, allowing robots to autonomously conduct transactions using USDC stablecoins—exemplified by robots independently paying for charging at stations in San Francisco. Beyond payments, OpenMind is creating a modular operating system (OM1) and a dedicated app store where users can download skills and applications for their robots. The company aims to address critical challenges in robotics, including value exchange, identity authentication, data privacy, and collaborative governance through its FABRIC protocol and blockchain technology, envisioning a future of seamless human-robot collaboration.

In 2025, humanoid robots are transitioning from science fiction to reality. From Tesla's Optimus to Figure AI's Figure 01, the capabilities of general-purpose humanoid robots are rapidly expanding with the support of large language models. According to Goldman Sachs predictions, the humanoid robot market could reach $154 billion by 2035. A trillion-dollar market is attracting the world's top tech companies and brightest minds to dive in.

However, as robots' "limbs" become increasingly advanced, a more core question arises: how to build an intelligent, open, and secure enough "brain"? When thousands of robots enter homes, hospitals, and cities, how will they collaborate, exchange value, and seamlessly integrate with human society?

Stanford professor and OpenMind founder Jan Liphardt provides his answer. After securing $20 million in funding led by Pantera Capital in August 2025, OpenMind hit the fast-forward button, releasing a series of products from the underlying operating system to upper-layer payment protocols, gradually outlining the complete blueprint for its "robot brain."

OpenMind's core business is providing SaaS-based cloud cognitive services to enterprises. But they keenly observed that as robots become independent economic participants, blockchain will play a crucial role in payment systems, identity authentication, data privacy, and collaborative governance.

Recently, OpenMind's collaboration with stablecoin issuer Circle and the deployment of robot charging stations on the streets of San Francisco are initial implementations of this vision. Robots can independently complete charging payments using USDC, which may mark the dawn of the "Machine Economy" era.

Simultaneously, OpenMind is building a dedicated app store for robots, allowing users to download applications and skills to their robots in one place, much like customizing phone apps on the Apple App Store or Google Play Store. The app was launched last week on the OpenMind App Store.

In this exclusive interview, we delved into the philosophy behind building the robot "brain," the design理念 of the modular operating system OM1, and how the FABRIC protocol and blockchain technology can构建 a future where machines and humans collaborate efficiently. He shared OpenMind's technical roadmap and offered profound insights on key issues such as developer ecosystems, remote operation, and data privacy.

Below is the interview content:

Establishing a "Bank Account" for Robots

In December 2025, OpenMind and stablecoin issuer Circle jointly announced the launch of a robot autonomous payment system based on the x402 protocol. As robots' capabilities improve, they will no longer be mere tools for executing tasks but will start to act as autonomous economic entities. They will need to purchase computing power, data, skills, and even hire other robots or humans to complete complex tasks.

To achieve this, a financial system designed specifically for machines, requiring no human intervention, becomes indispensable. The traditional banking system is clearly not prepared for this, and cryptocurrency and blockchain technology, with their native digital and decentralized characteristics, have become the most natural choice.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core business of OpenMind as mentioned in the article?

AOpenMind's core business is providing SaaS-based cloud cognitive services for enterprises.

QWhich company led the $20 million funding round for OpenMind in August 2025?

APantera Capital led the $20 million funding round for OpenMind in August 2025.

QWhat specific payment protocol did OpenMind collaborate with Circle to implement for robots?

AOpenMind collaborated with Circle to implement a robot autonomous payment system based on the x402 protocol.

QWhat is the name of the modular operating system that OpenMind is developing for robots?

AOpenMind is developing a modular operating system called OM1 for robots.

QWhat recent development did OpenMind announce for customizing robot capabilities, similar to smartphone app stores?

AOpenMind announced a dedicated app store for robots, allowing users to download applications and skills to their robots, similar to smartphone app stores.

Leituras Relacionadas

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHá 10m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHá 10m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Há 22m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Há 22m

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHá 37m

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHá 37m

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手Há 40m

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手Há 40m

Trading

Spot
活动图片