Report Review: Kyber Delay Tear NVIDIA Supply Chain, Only a Few Winners in the PCB Chain

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-23Última atualização em 2026-06-23

Resumo

Research Report Analysis: Kyber's Delay Reshapes NVIDIA Supply Chain, Winners Limited in PCB Sector Jefferies maintained a Buy rating on NVIDIA with a $300 price target (42% upside), but delivered a surprising take on the AI server PCB supply chain. The key finding is that the high-density orthogonal backplane PCB, codenamed "Kyber," is likely delayed to 2028 or even canceled. This prompts a downward revision in the global AI PCB market forecast for 2027/2028 by 5% and 11%, respectively, with CCL (copper-clad laminate) forecasts cut by 8% and 16%. While Kyber's postponement extends the lifecycle of the current Oberon architecture and defers some PCB volume, it does not halt the trend towards higher specifications. Migration to advanced materials like M9/M10-grade CCL and PTFE processes continues. The delay reshuffles the winners' list: upstream material suppliers (glass fabric, CCL) benefit from persistent tight supply and strong pricing power. Copper cable vendors gain a reprieve as the threat from PCB-based interconnects recedes. PCB manufacturers, however, face intensified competition, with mid-tier players most vulnerable to being squeezed out. The report stresses that the market adjustment reflects a timing shift, not a demand destruction. Kyber-related orders are deferred, not canceled. NVIDIA's core GPU competitiveness and the AI server growth trajectory remain intact. The analyst's investment thesis prioritizes "high-value-add" and "supply-constrained" segments: up...

Author:Rita

Trend Highlights

Jefferies issued a research report on NVIDIA on June 22, maintaining a Buy rating and raising the target price to $300 (implying a 42% upside from the current $210.69). The core view is surprising: while bullish on NVIDIA, it pours cold water on the AI server PCB supply chain. The backplane PCB product Kyber is highly likely to be delayed until 2028 or even canceled entirely, leading to a downward revision of the global AI PCB market size by 5% and 11% for 2027/2028 respectively, and the CCL (Copper Clad Laminate) market by 8% and 16% respectively. This adjustment might seem like bad news, but it is reshaping the list of winners in the AI server supply chain.

What the Kyber Delay Means

Jefferies believes the Kyber delay is essentially confirmed. Rubin Ultra was originally planned to use orthogonal backplane PCB (Kyber architecture), but due to bottlenecks in intra-rack connectivity technology, the Oberon architecture will still be used in 2027. Kyber is postponed to 2028 at the earliest, and could be canceled in the worst-case scenario. This change directly impacts the PCB iteration timeline.

However, delay does not mean regression. Switch boards and midplane boards continue to migrate towards high-end materials, with M9/10 grade CCL and PTFE processes becoming industry standards. CoWoP (Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate interconnect technology) penetration will begin earliest in 2027. The trend of rising unit value remains unchanged, only the timeframe has been extended.

Therefore, the biggest winners of this delay are not in manufacturing, but upstream. Upstream material suppliers like glass fiber cloth and CCL are already facing tight supply, with strong ability for sustained price increases and cost pass-through. PCB manufacturers face more direct pressure from order contraction. Copper cable suppliers benefit from the extended lifecycle of Oberon, reducing the risk of being replaced by PCB.

Why Focus on Specs, Not Just TAM

On the surface, the Kyber postponement led to significant downward revisions of the AI PCB and CCL market size estimates. But looking closely, this adjustment reflects a reshuffling of the pace of specification upgrades, not a disappearance of demand.

From the data, the original global AI PCB market expectation for 2027 was $25 billion; after excluding Kyber it's $24 billion, a 5% decrease. This is not a "shrinkage" but a "rescheduling." Kyber's order volume won't vanish; it will simply shift from 2027 to 2028. During this shift, the order volume left in 2027 will be used for Oberon upgrades, actually raising the specification standards.

This means the value per PCB doesn't change linearly. Lower-end products are revised down, higher-end products revised up. Within this mixed structure, there is room for total value recombination. Those who will profit are players positioned in high-end specifications and upstream materials, while manufacturers relying entirely on low-end capacity expansion will passively bear the pressure.

Supply Chain Divergence: Who's Out, Who's In the Inner Circle

The most direct impact of the Kyber delay is the acceleration of the elimination race in the PCB industry. Mid-tier manufacturers face the greatest pressure. High-end players have technical depth and customer stickiness, enabling them to follow NVIDIA's upgrade rhythm for spec iterations; low-end capacity has cost advantages, allowing them to quickly follow basic demand. But manufacturers stuck in the middle, unable to handle high-end complexity nor compete on cost, will be squeezed out.

Upstream material suppliers see structural opportunities. Glass fiber cloth and CCL suppliers face industry-wide demand. Kyber's cancellation won't reduce demand for glass fiber and CCL; it will only change the structure. The tight supply situation won't ease in the short term, with pricing power in the hands of material suppliers.

Copper cable suppliers gain a "reprieve" from the Kyber delay. Before Kyber's launch, copper cables faced the risk of gradual replacement by high-speed PCB interconnects. The extended lifecycle of the Oberon architecture means copper cables remain useful.

Why NVIDIA is Still Worth $300

Although Jefferies revised down the TAM expectations for PCB and CCL, it is not pessimistic about NVIDIA's prospects. The Kyber delay does not affect NVIDIA's core GPU competitiveness, nor does it change the growth trajectory of AI server shipments.

Kyber aims to further optimize rack efficiency in 2028 and beyond. Its delay means NVIDIA has one less innovation story for 2027, but it doesn't mean chip sales in 2027 will decline. Specification upgrades (M9/10, CoWoP) are still progressing as planned, and the unit value of AI servers continues to rise.

From a financial perspective, the CY28E NVIDIA EPS estimate is $14.14, leading to a $300 target price based on a 21x P/E ratio. This valuation level considers the certainty of long-term AI demand, not the timeline of a specific product generation.

What the Analysts are Betting On

Jefferies' final judgment points to: Upstream Materials > NVIDIA > Copper Cables > PCB Downstream.

They are bullish on the "high value-added end" and "supply bottleneck end" of the AI industry chain. GPU chips, as the core computing resource, have the highest value and most certain demand. Upstream materials are the bottleneck; scarcity determines premium. Copper cables get breathing room due to the delay. PCB manufacturing is most adversely affected because it is neither the bottleneck nor the core competency, just an executor.

This delay in PCB specification upgrades is not bad news, but a process of realignment. After the realignment, the profitability of players inside the inner circle and those positioned correctly will be higher, while those waiting on the sidelines will be left out.

Disclaimer

This article is a third-party brokerage research report summary and interpretation by Trend Research. The ratings, target prices, earnings forecasts, and related judgments cited are the views of that brokerage's analysts, representing only the position of their affiliated institution. They do not represent the views of Trend Research, nor constitute any investment advice.

Please note three points while reading: First, target prices are analysts' expectations for the next approximately 12 months, representing forecasts not promises, and are subject to frequent adjustments based on performance and market conditions. Second, sell-side research reports are inherently biased towards bullishness, and some covered companies may have investment banking relationships with the brokerage. Third, the value of a research report lies in its mainline logic and its underlying assumptions, not just a specific target price. Focus on the logic, not just the price.

The market carries risks; decisions should be made independently. This article should not serve as the basis for trading any securities.

Data Sources: Jefferies Research Report (Jacky He et al., June 22, 2026) · Prismark · NVIDIA Public Financial Reports

Tide Research · TideResearch · June 2026

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the report, what is the main impact of Kyber's potential delay or cancellation on the AI server PCB supply chain?

AThe main impact is a reshuffling of winners and losers in the supply chain. While the total market size for AI PCBs and CCL is revised down slightly (5% in 2027, 11% in 2028), the delay acts as a catalyst for industry consolidation. It accelerates the淘汰赛 for mid-tier PCB manufacturers who lack the technical depth for high-end规格 or the cost advantage for low-end products. The primary beneficiaries shift upstream to material suppliers (like glass fiber cloth and CCL providers) and also to copper cable makers, who get a reprieve from potential replacement by PCBs.

QWhy does the Jefferies report maintain a bullish $300 target price for NVIDIA despite the negative implications for the PCB segment?

AJefferies maintains a bullish outlook on NVIDIA because Kyber's delay does not impact NVIDIA's core GPU competitiveness or the overall growth trajectory of AI server shipments. The delay only affects a specific interconnect architecture for future rack efficiency, not the fundamental demand for NVIDIA's AI chips. The analyst's $300 target price is based on long-term AI demand certainty and CY28E EPS expectations of $14.14, applying a 21x P/E ratio. The valuation focuses on NVIDIA's position as the highest-value component in the AI supply chain, which remains unchanged.

QWhat are the key structural opportunities identified for upstream material suppliers due to the Kyber schedule change?

AThe report identifies significant structural opportunities for upstream material suppliers, particularly glass fiber cloth and Copper Clad Laminate (CCL) providers. Their advantage stems from persistent supply tightness in these materials, which grants them strong pricing power and the ability to pass on costs. The demand for these materials is industry-wide and not fundamentally reduced by Kyber's delay; it merely shifts in规格 mix. Therefore, they occupy a bottleneck position in the supply chain with inherent scarcity value.

QHow does the 'delay' of Kyber affect the value proposition of individual PCBs versus the total market size (TAM)?

AThe delay affects the timing and规格 mix more than the ultimate value proposition. While the Total Addressable Market (TAM) numbers are revised down for 2027/2028, this represents a timing shift ('错期'), not a disappearance of demand. Crucially, the average value per PCB may not decline linearly because the orders originally intended for Kyber in 2027 are now allocated to upgrading the Oberon architecture (e.g., adopting M9/10 grade CCL and PTFE processes). This means a re-composition where high-end PCB规格 gain a larger share, benefiting companies positioned in that segment, even within a temporarily adjusted TAM.

QAccording to the analyst's final judgment, how does the report rank the relative attractiveness of different segments in the AI supply chain affected by this news?

AThe analyst's final judgment ranks the relative attractiveness as follows: 1. Upstream Materials (highest) - Due to supply bottleneck and pricing power. 2. NVIDIA (GPU) - Due to its core, high-value position in AI compute. 3. Copper Cable Makers - Benefiting from a prolonged lifecycle of the Oberon architecture, reducing near-term replacement risk. 4. PCB Downstream Manufacturers (lowest) - Facing the most direct pressure from order adjustments and lacking the定价权 or technological moat of the other segments.

Leituras Relacionadas

Dialogue with Yihui Capital, SoundAI Technology, Ling Universe, and Zhongbo Jili: Opportunities and Challenges in the AI Smart Hardware Track

On June 28, 2026, an event titled "New Opportunities in AI Hardware: The Battle for Interactive Entry Points Begins" was held in Beijing. It featured a report from ITJuzi and discussions with experts from SoundAI, Ling Universe, One Reed Capital, and Zhongbo Juli on the opportunities and challenges in China's AI hardware sector. Key report findings highlight the sector's intense activity: 327 out of 431 startups founded post-2023 have secured funding, with 179 investments in H1 2026 alone. The landscape is dominated by embodied intelligent robots, while wearable tech like smart rings and AI glasses shows rapid growth. Geographically, Shenzhen leads, leveraging its superior hardware supply chain, followed by Beijing and Shanghai. The overarching trend is for companies to focus on micro-innovations within specific scenarios rather than reinventing foundational technology. Industry leaders shared several critical insights: 1. **Balancing Innovation & Market Readiness**: Entrepreneurs face the "hammer looking for a nail" dilemma. Success requires balancing technical capability with user acceptance, cost control, and incremental design improvements rather than chasing disruptive innovation. 2. **Competitive Landscape**: The future interactive entry point may not be a single super-device but a mix of universal terminals and specialized, scenario-specific hardware. While large companies have ecosystem advantages, startups can win by deeply targeting vertical markets and specific user groups. 3. **Core Challenges & Business Models**: Key hurdles include deep understanding of AI models and navigating non-transparent hardware supply chains. Viable business models may involve selling hardware at cost and generating revenue through software subscriptions, but this requires tight control over both hardware BOM and model inference costs. 4. **The Road to Commercialization**: The ultimate test is market validation—achieving sales growth and sustainable cash flow. Companies must find the right application scenario, use edge computing effectively, and close the loop from technology to commercial success. 5. **The Future of Interaction**: Proactive, context-aware interaction is the next frontier, though it's currently limited by issues like model hallucinations and environmental perception. The near-term focus should be on identifying target users and creating a coherent experience in specific domains, such as health wearables. In summary, to succeed in the competitive AI hardware arena, companies must strategically choose their niche, build a team with the right geographical advantages (e.g., leveraging Shenzhen's supply chain), and most importantly, execute a flawless commercialization strategy that translates technology into market-accepted products and sustainable business growth.

marsbitHá 32m

Dialogue with Yihui Capital, SoundAI Technology, Ling Universe, and Zhongbo Jili: Opportunities and Challenges in the AI Smart Hardware Track

marsbitHá 32m

CryptoQuant Founder: The Cost to Double BTC Has Increased by 20,000 Times, Where Will the $100 Billion Buying Power Come From?

CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju analyzes Bitcoin's current capital challenge. He notes that the cryptocurrency market has grown too large for retail-driven momentum alone to generate massive price increases as in past cycles. His calculations show that in 2011, approximately $2.7 million in capital inflow could push BTC's price up by 550x, whereas the current cycle requires an estimated $101 billion in new capital just for a 100% price increase. This shift underscores that sustaining a bull run now depends on attracting large-scale, long-term institutional capital rather than short-term speculative trading. Recent outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs, totaling nearly $10 billion since May, highlight the fragility of current demand and challenge the narrative of deep institutional support. While surveys indicate continued institutional interest, these entities prioritize regulated products, risk management, and portfolio integration over speculative gains. For the next significant bull market, Bitcoin must transition to being a core macro asset. The key drivers are no longer just more buyers, but capital allocation from larger, slower-moving entities like wealth advisors, corporate treasuries, banks, and sovereign wealth funds. This new phase pits Bitcoin against other major asset classes like AI for a share of institutional capital, making its growth trajectory dependent on sustained, high-quality inflows from diversified financial balance sheets.

marsbitHá 35m

CryptoQuant Founder: The Cost to Double BTC Has Increased by 20,000 Times, Where Will the $100 Billion Buying Power Come From?

marsbitHá 35m

Trading

Spot
活动图片