Rep. Waters Calls for SEC Hearing Over Crypto Enforcement Shift

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2025-12-30Última atualização em 2025-12-30

Resumo

US Representative Maxine Waters has called for an oversight hearing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), criticizing what she describes as a troubling shift in the agency’s enforcement approach toward the cryptocurrency industry. In a letter to the House Financial Services Committee, Waters expressed concern over the lack of congressional oversight and transparency under SEC Chair Paul Atkins, contrasting it with the more frequent testimonies given by former chairman Gary Gensler. Waters highlighted the SEC’s decision to drop several high-profile enforcement cases—including those involving Coinbase, Binance, and entrepreneur Justin Sun—as particularly alarming. She warned that these actions risk undermining investor confidence and the agency’s ability to combat fraud. Since Atkins took office in April, the SEC has adopted a more crypto-friendly stance, easing regulations and halting certain lawsuits. Waters questioned whether political influence may be affecting the SEC’s independence and urged the committee to demand greater clarity and accountability to protect investors in the digital asset market.

US Representative Maxine Waters called for an oversight hearing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, expressing concerns regarding what she feels is a marked and troubling shift in the commission’s approach to crypto regulation.

In a letter sent Sunday to French Hill, chair of the House Financial Services Committee (HFSC), Waters argued that the committee has failed in its responsibility to properly oversee the SEC. She said the lack of hearings has allowed significant policy changes to go unchecked, particularly as the agency retreats from enforcement actions against major crypto firms.

“Despite having a clear obligation to oversee the SEC, the Committee has not held a single hearing with Chairman Atkins,” Waters wrote, pointing to what she called “rapid, significant, and questionable policy shifts” under the current administration.

Waters went on to draw a contrast with the tenure of ex-SEC chairman Gary Gensler, who gave testimony before the committee twice within the first year of his tenure. She noted that the fact that there was no testimony given so far “raises serious questions about a lack of transparency and a lack of accountability.”

Dropped Crypto Cases Draw Scrutiny

Waters referred to the thwarting of several prominent enforcement actions by the SEC against cryptos as one of the most important reasons why she requested a hearing. Waters said that: “The SEC has abandoned enforcement actions against entities and individuals credibly accused of significant violations of US securities laws.”

Among the cases she cited were actions involving Coinbase, Binance, and crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun. Waters also claimed that, in some instances, defendants publicly announced the termination of enforcement actions before the SEC had formally voted on those decisions.

She warned that such moves risk undermining investor confidence and weakening the agency’s ability to deter fraud and market manipulation. Waters said the HFSC must press the SEC to explain how it plans to protect investors under its current approach.

A New Direction Under Chair Atkins

SEC Chair Paul Atkins, who assumed the role in April after his nomination by Donald Trump, has overseen a noticeably more crypto-friendly stance at the agency. Since taking office, Atkins has shelved several lawsuits and investigations, eased rules for crypto exchange-traded funds, and promoted a more collaborative regulatory tone through initiatives such as Project Crypto.

It is argued that this brings clarity and innovation. Waters thinks that this is a retrograde step that is detrimental to market security.

“She also questioned whether political factors are at play in the decision-making at the SEC, which would be troublesome to its independence and to its ability to monitor the markets,” the paper said.

Longstanding crypto critic

Waters has been dissatisfied with the cryptocurrency market and any legislative moves proposed by the Republicans. In the month of October, she declared her disapproval of the granting of amnesty to Binance’s co-founder Changpeng Zhao. At the beginning of 2023, she stated that “the CLARITY Act and GENIUS Act would be the start of a huge wave of fraud and the destruction of finances on a large scale.”

With her call for an oversight hearing on the matter, Waters seeks to compel the required public review of the SEC’s policies on cryptocurrency and return to the enforcement mindset that she finds preferable. Waters asked the committee to take prompt action because it may leave investors exposed to the current complexities arising from the digital asset market.

Highlighted Crypto News Today

Bitcoin Mining Difficulty Ends 2025 at 148.2 Trillion

TagsBlockchaincrypto IndustrySECSecurities and Exchange Commission

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Representative Maxine Waters call for an oversight hearing with the SEC?

AShe called for the hearing due to concerns about a marked and troubling shift in the SEC's approach to crypto regulation, particularly its retreat from enforcement actions against major crypto firms and a perceived lack of transparency and accountability.

QWhat specific examples of dropped enforcement actions did Waters cite in her letter?

AShe cited enforcement actions involving Coinbase, Binance, and crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun, noting that in some cases, defendants announced the termination of these actions before the SEC had formally voted on the decisions.

QHow has the SEC's approach to crypto regulation changed under Chair Paul Atkins?

AUnder Chair Atkins, the SEC has adopted a more crypto-friendly stance, which includes shelving several lawsuits and investigations, easing rules for crypto exchange-traded funds, and promoting a more collaborative regulatory tone through initiatives like Project Crypto.

QWhat risks did Waters associate with the SEC's current enforcement approach?

AWaters warned that the SEC's approach risks undermining investor confidence and weakening the agency's ability to deter fraud and market manipulation in the cryptocurrency market.

QWhat broader concerns did Waters raise about the SEC's independence and decision-making?

AShe questioned whether political factors are influencing the SEC's decision-making, which could compromise its independence and its ability to effectively monitor the markets.

Leituras Relacionadas

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHá 7m

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHá 7m

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Há 30m

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Há 30m

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbitHá 1h

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbitHá 1h

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbitHá 2h

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar US

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Talus Network (US) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Talus Network (US) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Talus Network (US)Depois de comprar o teu Talus Network (US), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Talus Network (US)Transaciona facilmente Talus Network (US) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

394 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar US

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de US (US) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片