RedotPay Eyes $1B US IPO at $4B+ Valuation

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-24Última atualização em 2026-02-24

Resumo

Hong Kong-based stablecoin payments firm RedotPay is reportedly preparing for a potential US IPO that could raise over $1 billion, valuing the company at more than $4 billion. The company is working with major banks including JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs on the offering, which may occur as early as this year. Launched in April 2023, RedotPay has grown rapidly, serving 6 million users and processing $10 billion in annualized payment volume. It offers stablecoin-linked payment cards, multi-currency wallets, and cross-border payment solutions. In 2025, the company raised $194 million across three funding rounds, achieving unicorn status. The move reflects broader investor interest in stablecoin infrastructure, as firms like RedotPay bridge traditional finance with blockchain-based settlement systems. A successful IPO would mark a significant milestone for the stablecoin payments industry.

Hong Kong-based stablecoin payments firm RedotPay is reportedly preparing for a potential US initial public offering that could raise more than $1 billion. Sources familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that the listing could value the company at over $4 billion.

RedotPay is working with JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Jefferies on a possible New York offering. The IPO could occur as early as this year, although terms remain under review. Additional banks may join the underwriting syndicate as plans develop.

The company declined to comment on the reported listing discussions.

Rapid Growth Since 2023 Launch

RedotPay launched in April 2023 and quickly established itself as a significant player in the stablecoin-linked payments space. The company provides payment cards linked to stablecoin balances, multi-currency digital wallets, and cross-border payout solutions.

RedotPay currently supports 6 million users and handles $10 billion in annualized payment volume, according to its website. The company is focused on connecting traditional finance infrastructure with blockchain-based settlement infrastructure.

Payment cards linked to stablecoins have been gaining popularity as users look for faster and cheaper ways to make cross-border payments. RedotPay’s business model is part of the larger trend of integrating stablecoins into mainstream financial activity.

Strong Fundraising Momentum in 2025

RedotPay raised $194 million in 2025 across three funding rounds. In March, it raised $40 million in a Series A round of funding, led by Lightspeed, with participation from HSG and Galaxy Ventures.

In September, the company raised a strategic round of funding of $47 million, taking it to unicorn status. Coinbase Ventures joined Galaxy Ventures and Vertex Ventures in funding the company. An undisclosed global technology entrepreneur also participated.

In December, RedotPay completed a $107 million Series B led by Goodwater Capital. Pantera Capital, Blockchain Capital, and Circle Ventures joined the round alongside continued support from HSG.

Stablecoin Sector Draws Heavy Capital

RedotPay’s IPO consideration reflects wider investor enthusiasm for stablecoin infrastructure. In 2025, venture capital investments kept pouring into payment and settlement service providers with a focus on blockchain integration.

M0, a Switzerland-based company, raised $40 million in Series B funding led by Polychain Capital and Ribbit Capital. Rain, a US-based startup, raised $58 million to build tools for banks to issue stablecoins.

In October, Chicago-based Coinflow raised $25 million in a Series A led by Pantera Capital to expand cross-border settlement services. CMT Digital later launched a $136 million fund targeting stablecoin startups.

Investors increasingly view stablecoins as a core building block for digital finance. As regulatory clarity improves, firms that offer compliant infrastructure may capture significant market share.

If RedotPay moves forward with its IPO, it may become one of the most well-known publicly traded stablecoin payment firms. The successful IPO will be a historic event for blockchain-based payment infrastructure and will further establish the importance of stablecoins in the global financial system.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Step Finance and SolanaFloor Shut Down After Treasury Hack Drains Millions in SOL

TagsCrypto PaymentHong KongIPORedotPaystablecoins

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the potential valuation and fundraising target for RedotPay's reported US IPO?

ARedotPay's potential US IPO could raise more than $1 billion and value the company at over $4 billion.

QWhich major banks are reportedly working with RedotPay on its potential New York offering?

ARedotPay is working with JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Jefferies on the possible offering.

QHow many users does RedotPay currently support and what is its annualized payment volume?

ARedotPay currently supports 6 million users and handles $10 billion in annualized payment volume.

QWhat significant funding rounds did RedotPay complete in 2025, and which investors were involved?

AIn 2025, RedotPay raised a $40M Series A (led by Lightspeed), a $47M strategic round (with Coinbase Ventures, Galaxy, Vertex), and a $107M Series B (led by Goodwater with Pantera, Blockchain Capital, Circle Ventures).

QHow does the article characterize the broader investor sentiment towards the stablecoin sector in 2025?

AThe article states there was heavy capital investment and widespread investor enthusiasm for stablecoin infrastructure, with venture capital pouring into payment and settlement service providers focused on blockchain integration.

Leituras Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHá 14m

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHá 14m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHá 29m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHá 29m

Trading

Spot
活动图片