Red Flags in US Stock Options Data: Last Time This Signal Appeared Was Before the 2022 Bear Market

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-02Última atualização em 2026-06-02

Resumo

A key gauge of U.S. stock market sentiment, the Cboe equity put-to-call ratio's five-day moving average, has fallen to its lowest level since March 2022, preceding the last bear market. This indicates investors are buying more than twice as many bullish call options as bearish puts, a historically extreme reading that signals potentially excessive optimism, particularly among retail traders fueled by the AI frenzy. Market analysts warn this mirrors conditions seen before the market peaks in late 2021 and early 2022, which were followed by sustained declines. Meanwhile, a record divergence has emerged between low overall market volatility (VIX) and high single-stock implied volatility, highlighting intense internal market divergence driven by AI-related stocks. Despite these cautionary signals, major indexes including the S&P 500 continued to hit record highs, with the tech sector leading gains.

Bullish sentiment in the U.S. stock market has spilled over into the options market, with a key indicator dropping to its lowest level in nearly four years, closely matching the levels seen just before the onset of the 2022 bear market, prompting market participants to sound cautionary warnings.

According to Dow Jones Market Data, the five-day moving average of the Cboe equity put-to-call ratio fell to 0.452 last Friday, its lowest since March 30, 2022. This means investor demand for call options is more than double that for put options.

Mark Arbeter, President of Arbeter Investments, told MarketWatch in an interview that this reading is "historically extremely low." While not a direct sell signal yet, it is enough to put investors on high alert. He believes this reflects overly exuberant sentiment among retail investors, fueled by the artificial intelligence frenzy.

The last time the indicator hit similar levels was during the peak of the first "counter-trend rally" in the early stages of the 2022 bear market; an earlier instance occurred around the market peak in late 2021. Both historical precedents were followed by sustained declines in the stock market.

Meanwhile, Mandy Xu, Head of Derivatives Market Intelligence at Cboe, pointed out that while the overall market volatility gauge VIX continues to fall, the implied volatility of individual stocks has surged significantly. The spread between the two has widened to a record high, revealing high levels of internal divergence within the stock market.

However, despite these warning signals, the bullish momentum has not diminished. On Monday, all three major benchmark indices – the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite – set new all-time closing records. According to Dow Jones Market Data, the S&P 500 has recorded 23 new all-time closing highs year-to-date.

Put/Call Ratio Hits Four-Year Low

The five-day moving average of the Cboe equity put-to-call ratio closed at 0.452 last Friday, its lowest since March 30, 2022. Mark Arbeter noted that this value indicates investor demand for call options is more than double that for put options, placing it in the extremely low range on a historical scale.

The 21-day moving average of this indicator also declined, falling to 0.493 last Friday, a new low since December 9, 2021 (when it was 0.490). Mark Arbeter stated that as long as this moving average remains in a "downward trend," the stock market may still have room to continue rising, but the trend itself is evidence of an overheating market.

It is worth noting that put options can be used either as directional tools to bet on market declines or for portfolio hedging. When investors massively buy call options and hedging demand plummets, it often signals that market risk appetite is nearing extreme levels.

Historical Precedents Point to the Eve of the 2022 Bear Market

Mark Arbeter's review of history shows that the five-day moving average last reached similar levels during the first "counter-trend rally" of the 2022 bear market; looking further back, comparable readings also appeared during the market topping phase in late 2021.

"We saw similar levels as the market entered the topping zone leading into the 2022 bear market," he said.

Following these two historical junctures, the U.S. stock market entered sustained downturns, providing a reference for the warning signal conveyed by the current indicator. Mark Arbeter also emphasized that this does not constitute a clear sell trigger at present, but historical experience is enough for investors to exercise restraint when chasing gains.

Increased Internal Market Divergence, AI Concepts Dominate Gains

In contrast to the calm appearance of the overall market, significant internal divergence is emerging within the stock market. Mandy Xu noted in a report released Monday that single-stock volatility, as measured by the VIXEQ index, approached a one-year high last week, with the spread relative to the VIX widening to a record high.

This is the latest signal that internal market divergence has risen to extremely high levels in the past two months—stocks related to artificial intelligence have dominated most of the S&P 500's gains.

On Monday, the S&P 500 Information Technology sector surged about 2.5%, becoming the core support for the index hitting another record high. FactSet data shows that among all 11 sectors of the index, only the Technology and Energy sectors closed higher on the day, while most other sectors declined.

The rise in the Energy sector is related to geopolitical disturbances. Reports indicate that Iran has halted peace talks with the U.S. and is seeking a full blockade of the Strait of Hormuz—a crucial waterway for oil and gas exports in the Middle East—pushing international oil prices higher.

However, U.S. President Donald Trump responded in a social media post Monday afternoon, stating, "Talks with the Islamic Republic of Iran are still moving quickly."

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the Cboe equity put/call ratio's five-day moving average, and why is its current level a cause for concern?

AThe Cboe equity put/call ratio's five-day moving average fell to 0.452, its lowest level since March 30, 2022. This is a concern because it indicates extreme investor optimism, with demand for call options more than double that for put options. Historically, similar low readings preceded significant market downturns, such as those in late 2021 and during the early 2022 bear market rebound.

QAccording to Mark Arbeter, what do the current low put/call ratio levels historically correlate with?

AAccording to Mark Arbeter, the current low levels of the put/call ratio's moving averages historically correlate with market tops and subsequent sustained declines. Similar readings were seen during the topping phase in late 2021 and during the first countertrend rally of the 2022 bear market, both of which were followed by prolonged market drops.

QWhat market divergence does Mandy Xu point out regarding volatility indicators?

AMandy Xu points out a significant divergence between overall market volatility and single-stock volatility. While the VIX (market volatility index) has been declining, the VIXEQ index (single-stock volatility) has surged to near one-year highs. The spread between the two has widened to a record level, indicating extreme internal market dispersion.

QWhich market segment is currently driving most of the S&P 500's gains, and what evidence supports this?

AStocks related to the artificial intelligence (AI) theme are currently driving most of the S&P 500's gains. This is evidenced by the fact that the S&P 500 Information Technology sector rose about 2.5% on Monday, being the primary driver for the index's new record high. Most other sectors declined that day, showing concentrated leadership in tech/AI stocks.

QDespite the warning signals, what is the current overall trend of the major U.S. stock indexes?

ADespite the warning signals, the overall trend of the major U.S. stock indexes remains strongly bullish. On the Monday referenced in the article, the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite all closed at record highs. Year-to-date, the S&P 500 had already recorded 23 all-time closing highs.

Leituras Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Mesmo agora

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Mesmo agora

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 18m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 18m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHá 46m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHá 46m

Trading

Spot
活动图片