Rally Without Conviction

insights.glassnodePublicado em 2026-06-03Última atualização em 2026-06-03

Resumo

The article analyzes Bitcoin's current rally, noting its resilience amidst a macro backdrop of sticky inflation and tight financial conditions. However, key on-chain metrics suggest the uptrend lacks strong conviction. While capital flows have turned positive, they remain well below levels seen at the start of prior major bull phases. The recovery has shifted market sentiment from fear toward uncertainty, but without signs of the deep capitulation typical of cycle bottoms. Key support is identified near $76.9k, with major resistance around $86.9k. Off-chain data shows improving ETF inflows and spot buying, but derivative markets indicate compressed volatility and reduced downside hedging demand. The conclusion is that while market structure is strengthening, the rally appears to be a gradual, selective recovery rather than a confirmed momentum breakout, requiring stronger capital inflows to sustainably overcome overhead supply.

The macro backdrop remains caught between slowing growth and inflation that refuses to fully roll over. Recent US inflation data came in firmer than expected, while labour markets continue to hold up better than many anticipated. As a result, markets have pushed rate cut expectations further into the future, keeping Treasury yields elevated and financial conditions relatively tight.

Liquidity remains the key driver across risk assets. Equities have continued to grind higher, but beneath the surface, the environment still feels shaky, with markets adjusting to the reality of rates staying higher for longer. At the same time, oil and broader commodity strength continue to feed into inflation expectations, particularly amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.

For digital assets, the picture remains constructive but selective. Bitcoin has continued to show resilience despite tighter liquidity conditions and a firm US dollar, suggesting underlying demand remains intact. However, softer ETF flows and elevated real yields imply that a more sustained move higher will likely require either easing financial conditions or a fresh catalyst to reignite broader risk appetite.

On-chain Insight

From Fear Toward Uncertainty

Against a macro backdrop of sticky inflation, elevated Treasury yields, and tighter financial conditions, Bitcoin has continued to demonstrate relative resilience, suggesting underlying demand remains intact even as the broader risk environment stays unsettled. To assess where the current cycle stands from a structural perspective, the Relative Unrealized Loss, which measures the aggregate dollar value of unrealized losses held across all investors as a fraction of total market capitalization, offers a precise cyclical barometer. During the February flash drop, this metric peaked at 25% of market cap, a reading that signals meaningful stress but remains a fraction of the extremes recorded in prior bear cycles. The subsequent recovery above $80k has compressed this figure to approximately 8%, a transition that shifts the prevailing sentiment from fear toward uncertainty rather than capitulation.

If $60k proves to have been the cycle low, this bear market would stand as the shallowest on record, one that registered fear but stopped well short of the broad capitulation that has historically marked durable cycle bottoms.

Live Chart

Sizing Up the Capital Flow

With sentiment shifting from fear toward uncertainty, the key question is whether the current rally represents a typical bear market bounce or the early stages of a genuine bull market transition. The most direct way to weigh this probability is to size up net capital flow, measured by the Realized Cap 30-Day Net Position Change, which tracks the monthly change in total capital stored on-chain. Following the recent rally to $82k, this metric has reached $2.8B per month, a positive reading that explains the constructive momentum of recent weeks.

However, context is critical: at the early stages of every major rally during the 2023 to 2025 bull market, this metric accelerated rapidly from around $2B toward $10B per month. The current reading, while encouraging, remains significantly below that threshold, suggesting the capital inflow underpinning this recovery lacks the conviction seen at comparable inflection points in the prior cycle.

Live Chart

Support and Resistance Through the Cost Basis Lens

Confirming the uncertainty that persists despite a 37% rally from $60k to $82k amid still-modest capital inflows, the Realized Price by Age metric offers a granular framework for identifying the most immediate support and resistance levels. This model tracks the average acquisition price of coins segmented by holding period, mapping the behavioral anchors of distinct investor cohorts onto the price chart.

The momentum of the ongoing rally has been driven largely by a wave of accumulation over the past 30 days, with this cohort's cost basis now sitting at approximately $76.9k, forming the most immediate support floor in the short term. Overhead, the cost basis of investors who accumulated during the November to February range market consolidation clusters near $86.9k, representing the most probable near-term resistance zone as these holders approach breakeven and face a growing incentive to distribute into strength.

Live Chart

Off-Chain Insights

ETF Demand Rebuilds

US Spot Bitcoin ETF flows have turned decisively positive in recent weeks, with sustained inflows returning alongside Bitcoin’s recovery back above the $80K level. After months of inconsistent demand and heavy outflows during the Q1 drawdown, the latest shift suggests institutional appetite is beginning to re-emerge in a more meaningful way.

Importantly, the recovery in ETF demand has remained persistent rather than driven by a single allocation spike, pointing to steady accumulation as market conditions improve. The strength of inflows has also accelerated alongside price, reinforcing the view that traditional capital is once again supporting momentum instead of fading rallies.

The current setup reflects a notable improvement in market structure relative to earlier this year. ETF flows are now acting as a tailwind rather than a source of persistent sell pressure, reducing one of the key headwinds that capped previous recovery attempts. If sustained, continued institutional accumulation could provide the demand base required for Bitcoin to challenge higher overhead supply zones in the weeks ahead.

Live Chart

Coinbase Spot Buying Re-Accelerates

Coinbase Spot Volume Delta has turned sharply positive over the last two weeks, with aggressive buy-side activity returning as Bitcoin pushed back into the low-$80Ks. The recent shift stands in stark contrast to the persistent sell pressure seen throughout much of Q1, where negative volume delta consistently reinforced downside momentum.

Importantly, the latest move higher has been accompanied by repeated positive spot flow impulses rather than isolated buying spikes, suggesting sustained demand is beginning to absorb overhead supply. The strength in Coinbase activity also aligns closely with the recovery in ETF inflows, pointing to renewed participation from US-based and institutional buyers.

The current structure suggests spot demand is once again becoming supportive of price rather than acting as a source of distribution. Continued strength in Coinbase buy-side flows, particularly alongside rising ETF inflows, points to improving market conviction and a healthier demand profile underpinning the latest rally.

Live Chart

Hyperliquid Traders Lean Increasingly Long

Positioning on Hyperliquid has become increasingly skewed toward the long side over the last several weeks, with net BTC positioning steadily rising alongside Bitcoin’s recovery into the low-$80Ks. The shift marks a notable reversal from the persistent short bias that dominated through much of Q1 2026 during the market’s drawdown toward the low-$60Ks.

Importantly, the recent increase in long exposure has developed gradually rather than through a single crowded positioning spike, suggesting traders are steadily rebuilding directional bullish exposure as market conditions improve. Net positioning is now sitting near the strongest long bias seen since late-2025, reflecting growing confidence in upside continuation.

The persistence of long positioning alongside rising price action points to improving trader sentiment and a more constructive speculative backdrop, although increasingly crowded long exposure may leave the market more sensitive to short-term volatility and liquidation-driven pullbacks.

Live Chart

Implied Volatility Moves Lower Across the Front End

Bitcoin implied volatility has shifted lower over the past week, with the front month declining from 39% to 34.6%. Longer dated maturities have also moved lower, decreasing by around 1 to 2 vol points across the curve.

The move reflects a broader repricing lower across the term structure, as traders scale back expectations for near-term realized movement. The decline follows the recent volatility rebound and comes alongside more contained spot action, reinforcing the idea that the market is transitioning back toward a calmer regime.

As implied volatility compresses, the cost of optionality declines across maturities, particularly at the front end where pricing remains most sensitive to shifts in short-term positioning and demand.

The current structure reflects a market pricing fewer large moves ahead, with volatility supply continuing to outweigh demand across the curve.

Live Chart

Volatility Risk Premium Remains Positive

While implied volatility continues to compress across the curve, realized volatility is falling even faster. Bitcoin’s 30 day realized volatility now stands at 30.48%, continuing the steady decline seen over the past several weeks as spot action remains relatively contained.

At the same time, front-month implied volatility remains around 36.4%, leaving implied still trading above realized and preserving a positive volatility risk premium. In other words, options continue to price more movement ahead than what Bitcoin has recently delivered in spot volatility.

The spread between implied and realized volatility has also been rebuilding over the past two to three weeks, moving back toward the 6 vol area after briefly compressing toward flat in April. This suggests that despite the broader volatility reset lower, demand for optionality still remains elevated relative to realized movement.

Carry conditions therefore remain supportive for volatility sellers, even as the broader volatility regime continues to soften across both implied and realized measures.

Live Chart

Skew Compression Signals Softer Downside Hedging Demand

As volatility expectations continue to reset lower, skew is also normalizing across the curve. The move has been most pronounced at the front end, with the 1 week 25 delta skew compressing from around -10% to -4% over the past week. Longer dated maturities have also softened, with the 1 month, 3 month, and 6 month tenors losing roughly 1 to 2 points of put premium.

Notably, this compression comes while Bitcoin continues to consolidate around the 80K area amid a less supportive macro backdrop. Rather than showing increasing demand for downside protection, the options surface has continued to reprice toward a more balanced structure.

The move higher reflects a steady reduction in downside put premium relative to calls, pointing to softer demand for protective positioning across the curve.

While skew remains in put territory across maturities, the persistent compression suggests downside hedging demand is gradually easing rather than intensifying.

Live Chart

Dealer Gamma Keeps Spot Sensitive Around $82K

Dealer positioning continues to create a reactive structure around current price levels. The largest concentration of negative gamma sits at the $82K strike with roughly $2.6B of exposure, while positive gamma builds around $85K with close to $1.8B.

With spot still below the negative gamma cluster at $82K, a move back toward that zone could trigger reactive dealer hedging flows, reinforcing momentum and amplifying price action. Higher up, the positive gamma concentration around $85K could instead dampen volatility.

Flow also reflects shifting positioning. Over the past 7 days, put buying represented 71% of taker premium flow, reflecting elevated demand for downside protection during the recent consolidation. More recently, 58% of the last 24 hours flow came from puts being sold, suggesting some hedges are now being unwound.

The structure leaves the market increasingly sensitive to amplified hedging flows if spot re-engages the large negative gamma cluster around $82K.

Live Chart

Conclusion

In sum, Bitcoin’s recovery has continued to strengthen beneath the surface, with spot-led demand, renewed ETF inflows, and improving speculative positioning all contributing to a more constructive market structure. The sharp compression in Relative Unrealized Loss, alongside the stabilization of key on-chain profitability and liquidity metrics, suggests the February decline is increasingly being treated as a cyclical reset rather than the start of a deeper bear market regime.

At the same time, the character of this rally remains notably different from the aggressive expansions seen throughout 2023 to 2025. Capital inflows are recovering, but still remain well below prior breakout thresholds, while volatility compression and calmer derivatives positioning point toward a market that is rebuilding confidence gradually rather than entering a euphoric phase. This leaves the current advance looking more like a structurally supported recovery than a fully confirmed momentum breakout.

With Bitcoin now trading back into a dense overhead supply region between roughly $82K and $87K, the market is entering an increasingly important area for price discovery. A sustained hold above this zone would likely require stronger spot participation and deeper capital rotation to absorb remaining overhead supply. Until then, the broader structure continues to improve, but conviction still appears to be rebuilding rather than fully returned.

.


Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for informational and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here, and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.

Exchange balances presented are derived from Glassnode’s comprehensive database of address labels, which are amassed through both officially published exchange information and proprietary clustering algorithms. While we strive to ensure the utmost accuracy in representing exchange balances, it is important to note that these figures might not always encapsulate the entirety of an exchange’s reserves, particularly when exchanges refrain from disclosing their official addresses. We urge users to exercise caution and discretion when utilizing these metrics. Glassnode shall not be held responsible for any discrepancies or potential inaccuracies.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason the author suggests Bitcoin's recent rally lacks conviction?

AThe author points to the Realized Cap 30-Day Net Position Change metric, which, at $2.8B per month, remains significantly below the $10B per month threshold seen at major inflection points in the previous bull cycle (2023-2025). This suggests the capital inflow underpinning the current recovery is not as strong or convinced as in prior cycles.

QAccording to the 'Support and Resistance Through the Cost Basis Lens' section, what are the key support and resistance levels for Bitcoin?

AThe most immediate short-term support floor is at approximately $76.9k, which is the cost basis of coins accumulated in the past 30 days. The most probable near-term resistance zone is around $86.9k, which is the cost basis of investors who accumulated during the November to February consolidation period.

QWhat positive shift in market structure does the 'ETF Demand Rebuilds' section highlight?

AThe section highlights that US Spot Bitcoin ETF flows have turned from a source of persistent sell pressure into a tailwind. Sustained positive inflows alongside the price recovery suggest institutional appetite is re-emerging and providing a supportive demand base for Bitcoin, reducing a key headwind from earlier in the year.

QWhat does the compression of the 'skew' metric in the options market signal, according to the article?

AThe compression of skew (e.g., the 1-week 25 delta skew moving from -10% to -4%) signals that demand for downside protection (put options) is softening. This indicates that, despite a less supportive macro backdrop, market participants are showing less urgent need for hedging against a sharp price decline.

QOverall, how does the article characterize the nature of Bitcoin's current market advance?

AThe article characterizes the advance as a 'structurally supported recovery' rather than a 'fully confirmed momentum breakout.' It notes improving market structure beneath the surface but highlights that capital inflows and trader conviction are still rebuilding and lack the aggressive, euphoric character of the prior bull market phases.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ruHá 4m

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ruHá 4m

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbitHá 11m

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbitHá 11m

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbitHá 20m

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbitHá 20m

Trading

Spot
活动图片