Qubic Unveils 3-Phase Rollout For Dogecoin Mining Attack

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-25Última atualização em 2026-03-25

Resumo

Qubic has announced a three-phase plan to transition its mining operations from Monero (XMR) to Dogecoin (DOGE), starting on April 1. The shift is designed to be deliberate and methodical rather than instantaneous. Phase 1 (beginning April 1) serves as a testing period where Monero mining remains active 50% of the time, while Dogecoin runs at 100% in "test mode." Computor revenue during this phase remains in XMR only. Phase 2 allows computors to choose between XMR and DOGE revenue, with XMR gradually phased out. Those opting for DOGE will no longer receive XMR. Phase 3 completes the transition, with revenue switching entirely to DOGE, XMR mining disabled, and both DOGE mining and AI training running at full capacity. Qubic claims its network is now three times faster after recent optimizations, which it says will help handle the increased load. The team cited Dogecoin’s significantly larger daily emission value—approximately $1.44 million compared to Monero’s—as the key economic incentive for the switch.

Qubic will begin its staged transition from Monero to Dogecoin mining on April 1. Via X, the Qubic team layed out a three-phase rollout that it says is designed to move deliberately rather than flip the network over in a single step.

In a post published Tuesday, the project said “the transition from Monero to Dogecoin doesn’t happen overnight” and that its core team had designed a three-phase process in which “each phase is evaluated before moving forward.” The framing is notable given Qubic’s increasingly explicit language around its mining strategy. The headline objective, as the team describes it, is to reach a final state where “DOGE + AI” run “simultaneously, full time.”

3-Phase Rollout For Dogecoin Mining Shift

The first phase begins April 1 and is positioned as a testing period lasting one to two epochs. During that stage, computor revenue remains denominated in XMR only, Monero mining remains active 50% of the time, and Dogecoin enters what Qubic calls “test mode” while running on mainnet at 100%. AI training continues alongside it. In other words, Qubic is not immediately removing the existing Monero-based incentive structure, but introducing DOGE at full operational intensity before revenue is switched over.

The second phase is the actual migration. For one to two epochs, computors will be able to choose between XMR and DOGE revenue, with XMR beginning to phase out and DOGE phasing in with a top-up applied. Qubic also said that computors who opt to bring DOGE “are no longer eligible for XMR.”

By the third and final phase, Qubic says computor revenue will be DOGE only. The XMR dispatcher will be turned off completely, DOGE will remain active 100% of the time, and AI training will also run at 100%. “No rushing. No shortcuts. Just disciplined execution,” the team wrote.

Source: X @_Qubic_

Qubic paired that roadmap with a performance claim aimed directly at the April 1 launch window. On March 23, the project said its network had become “3x faster” on live mainnet, with tick times reduced from 2 seconds a year ago to 1 second and now 0.6 seconds after the latest core optimization.

“Every share a miner submits gets validated through Oracle Machines in a single tick,” Qubic wrote. “Faster ticks mean faster confirmations, a more efficient pipeline, and a network that can handle the load when April 1st hits. The network got faster right before it needed to be.”

The economic case for targeting Dogecoin is straightforward in Qubic’s telling. In a March 20 post, the team pointed to its earlier Monero campaign, saying it went from less than 2% of Monero’s hashrate to “51%+ dominance in a live takeover event,” while generating more than $3.5 million in mining revenue and finding over 26,000 XMR blocks.

Dogecoin, it argued, is a much larger prize. “DOGE produces roughly 14.4 million coins per day. At current prices, that’s approximately $1.44M in daily emission, roughly 10x what Monero was producing,” the team wrote. “The same playbook. A much bigger target.”

At press time, DOGE traded at $0.09752.

DOGE holds above key support, 1-week chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the start date for Qubic's transition from Monero to Dogecoin mining?

AApril 1.

QHow many phases are in Qubic's rollout plan for the Dogecoin mining shift?

AThree phases.

QIn the final phase, what will be the only form of computor revenue?

ADOGE only.

QWhat performance improvement did Qubic claim its network achieved on March 23?

AIt became 3x faster on live mainnet, with tick times reduced to 0.6 seconds.

QWhat economic reason did Qubic give for targeting Dogecoin instead of Monero?

ADogecoin produces approximately $1.44M in daily emission, which is roughly 10x what Monero was producing.

Leituras Relacionadas

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight NewsHá 5m

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight NewsHá 5m

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbitHá 1h

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbitHá 1h

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

Veteran trader's case study: trading the market's "wrong expectations". This trade centered on a textbook "expectation error" after a weak CPI report. While the market initially priced in broad monetary easing (sending Nasdaq to 30,060), the crucial 30-year real yield hit a 20-year high. This signaled a fractured transmission mechanism: short-term rates eased, but long-term funding costs (vital for tech valuations) refused to fall. The trader executed five short positions on the Nasdaq (NQ) as it fell from 30,060 to 28,768. The core methodology: don't just trade the data, but analyze the market's implied causal chain and identify where it breaks. In this case, the chain was: Weak CPI → Policy Easing → Lower Long-Term Funding Costs → NQ Valuation Expansion. The break occurred between policy easing and long-term rates. The "veto variable" – long-term real yields – refused to confirm the bullish narrative. Trades were structured around "fast variables" (price) temporarily repairing while "slow variables" (funding conditions) remained broken. The article outlines a repeatable framework: 1) Map the market's implied causal chain. 2) Identify the veto variable. 3) Observe if it rejects the narrative. 4) Enter when price still follows the old script. 5) Choose the cleanest asset expression (e.g., short NQ, not broad S&P). 6) Define both invalidation and fulfillment exit conditions. The key insight: Alpha often comes not from an information edge, but from a "reaction function edge" – recognizing when the market is applying an outdated causal logic to new data. The critical question: What causal chain is the market's first reaction relying on, and is that chain still valid today?

marsbitHá 1h

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片