Qubic Sets April 1 Start Date For Dogecoin Attack

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-23Última atualização em 2026-03-23

Resumo

Qubic has announced it will launch its Dogecoin mining initiative on April 1, 2026, as part of a broader strategy to integrate external proof-of-work into its decentralized compute network. The project aims to use Dogecoin ASIC mining to strengthen QUBIC tokenomics by selling mined DOGE to buy and burn QUBIC, making it deflationary. The effort also serves as a real-world stress test for Qubic’s Oracle Machines, which validate mining shares through a Byzantine fault-tolerant system. This follows Qubic’s earlier controversial campaign against Monero, which was later reassessed as a 34% attack rather than a 51% takeover. Unlike the Monero operation, Dogecoin mining will run concurrently with Qubic’s AI training workloads, without displacing them.

Qubic says it will begin its Dogecoin push on April 1, marking the next phase of a mining strategy that first drew attention through its campaign against Monero. The big question is whether Qubic can turn Dogecoin mining into a live demonstration of its broader thesis: that external proof-of-work can be absorbed into a decentralized compute network and used to strengthen Qubic’s own token economics.

In a series of posts over the weekend, Qubic framed the rollout as both a product launch and a stress test. “Every Dogecoin share mined through the Qubic network gets validated by Oracle Machines: independent computors spread across the network who each verify the share separately. Up to 13 oracle commits per transaction. If the result passes the quorum’s Byzantine fault tolerance threshold (agreement from 451 of 676 computors), it’s validated on-chain.”

Qubic To Launch Dogecoin Mining Offensive On April 1

The team added that Oracle Machines went live on mainnet on February 11 and described Dogecoin mining as “the first real-world external use case built on top of this system.” Those claims line up with Qubic’s March technical updates, which said Dogecoin mining is on track for an April 1 mainnet launch and positioned it as a real-world stress test for the network’s outsourced-computing stack.

Dogecoin ASICs will be able to mine Qubic and receive higher rewards, while mined DOGE will be sold to buy QUBIC on the open market. Part of that purchased supply, it said, would be recycled into mining incentives, while “the rest will be burned,” with the explicit goal of making QUBIC deflationary. Qubic’s official Dogecoin mining explainer similarly says the community is still finalizing how mining revenue will be split between ASIC miners, computors, and broader network incentives.

That makes the April 1 launch more than a simple mining integration. Qubic has been arguing for months that Dogecoin changes its operating model because ASIC-based Scrypt mining can run in parallel with the network’s CPU- and GPU-based AI training, rather than alternating between workloads as it previously did with Monero.

“ASIC miners handle Dogecoin. CPUs and GPUs continue training Aigarth. Both contribute to the network. Neither displaces the other,” Qubic wrote in its March 3 explainer. “The same validation framework can serve price feeds, cross-chain data, and any external information that smart contracts need to act on.”

The backdrop is Qubic’s much more controversial Monero campaign. In August 2025, the project published a post titled “Qubic Performs 51% Monero Network Takeover Demonstration,” claiming it had reached majority hashrate and reorganized the chain. But that version did not hold up cleanly under later scrutiny.

Later independent analyses placed Qubic’s effective share closer to 28% to 35%. Even Sergey Ivancheglo ultimately conceded the operation “should be rebranded into ‘34% attack,’” a nod to the fact that the maneuver looked more like selfish mining than outright majority control.

Dogecoin was not a sudden pivot. By mid-August 2025, after the Monero episode, Qubic’s community had already chosen Dogecoin as its next target for “the following mining season,” with Ivancheglo indicating the transition would take months of development. Qubic’s January and March 2026 updates show that timeline now converging on launch: planning began in January, testing advanced through March, and the dispatcher is already live for test tasks.

At press time, DOGE traded at $0.09.

DOGE hovers above key support area, 1-week chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the start date for Qubic's Dogecoin mining initiative and what is the broader goal of this strategy?

AQubic will begin its Dogecoin push on April 1. The broader goal is to demonstrate that external proof-of-work can be absorbed into a decentralized compute network to strengthen Qubic's own token economics.

QHow does the Qubic network validate Dogecoin shares, and what is the threshold for validation?

ADogecoin shares are validated by Oracle Machines, which are independent computors spread across the network. Validation requires agreement from 451 out of 676 computors to meet the Byzantine fault tolerance threshold.

QWhat will happen to the Dogecoin (DOGE) mined through the Qubic network, and how does this relate to QUBIC tokens?

AMined DOGE will be sold to buy QUBIC on the open market. Part of the purchased QUBIC will be recycled into mining incentives, and the rest will be burned to make QUBIC deflationary.

QHow does Qubic's approach to Dogecoin mining differ from its previous campaign against Monero?

AUnlike the Monero campaign, which alternated workloads, Dogecoin mining with ASICs can run in parallel with Qubic's CPU- and GPU-based AI training, allowing both to contribute without displacing each other.

QWhat was the outcome of Qubic's Monero campaign, and how did independent analyses view it?

AQubic initially claimed a 51% network takeover, but independent analyses later placed its effective hashrate share at 28% to 35%, leading to it being rebranded as a '34% attack' rather than a majority control.

Leituras Relacionadas

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHá 17m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHá 17m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Há 29m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Há 29m

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHá 44m

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHá 44m

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手Há 47m

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手Há 47m

Trading

Spot
活动图片