Pump.fun (PUMP) Momentum Fades: Is Another Leg Down Imminent?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-26Última atualização em 2026-03-26

Resumo

Pump.fun (PUMP) has declined by over 5.63% in the past 24 hours, with its price dropping to around $0.00178. Despite a 16.98% increase in trading volume to $95.67 million, the market cap stands at $587.57 million, and liquidations have reached $403.30K. Technical indicators suggest a bearish trend: the MACD is below zero, indicating downward momentum, while the RSI at 41.03 shows a slight bearish bias. The Chaikin Money Flow is nearly neutral, and Bull-Bear Power suggests a lack of strong directional momentum. If bearish pressure continues, PUMP could test the $0.0016 support level. A bullish reversal would require breaking the $0.0018 resistance.

As of 26th March, Pump.fun (PUMP) is waving a red flag across the chart, registering a loss of over 5.63% in the last 24 hours. The asset opened the day trading at around $0.001922, and with the bearish pressure in the PUMP market, the price has retraced to a bottom range of $0.00177.

Currently, the Pump.fun price is trading at around the $0.001780 mark, with the market cap reaching $587.57 million. Besides, the daily trading volume is up by over 16.98%, touching $95.67 million. The Coinglass data has reported that the PUMP market has seen a 24-hour liquidation worth $403.30K.

With the negative sentiment of Pump.fun, the price might slip to test the $0.0016 level. Assuming a sturdy downside correction to happen, the death cross could emerge, and the bears would send the price even lower to its former supports.

If the bulls entered the PUMP market, the price could immediately rise to the resistance at around $0.0018. An extended pressure on the upside might initiate the golden cross to take place, and drive the asset’s price to its higher targets.

Which Direction Will PUMP’s Momentum Take Next?

Pump.fun’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and signal lines are below the zero line, which means the momentum is clearly in the downtrend. The price has been moving lower, and the market is heavy, so any bounce may struggle unless momentum starts to shift.

Besides, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator of PUMP at 0.01 is almost neutral, with a slight bullish tilt. Money is flowing into the asset, but it is very weak. Notably, the buyers are just starting to step in, and this points to a sideways market, unless stronger inflows begin to build.

The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) value of 41.03 indicates a slight bearish bias. Sellers have a small edge, and the price has been leaning lower, but the momentum is not strong. Also, there is still room to move either way, but for now, the Pump.fun market leans a bit weak.

Moreover, the Bull-Bear Power (BBP) reading of PUMP at -0.000095 is in the neutral phase. It has no dominance from either buyers or sellers, and the market is undecided, with very mild momentum. This points to sideways movement, unless a stronger push starts to build.

Top Updated Crypto News

MUBARAK Takes a Hit: Will the Sell-Off Continue?

Criptomoedas em alta

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current price of Pump.fun (PUMP) and how much has it lost in the last 24 hours?

AThe current price of Pump.fun (PUMP) is approximately $0.001780, and it has lost over 5.63% in the last 24 hours.

QWhat is the significance of the MACD and signal lines being below the zero line for PUMP?

AThe Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and signal lines being below the zero line indicates that the momentum for PUMP is clearly in a downtrend.

QAccording to the RSI, what is the current market bias for Pump.fun?

AThe daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) value of 41.03 indicates a slight bearish bias, meaning sellers have a small edge.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator suggest about money flow into the PUMP asset?

AThe Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator for PUMP is at 0.01, which is almost neutral with a very slight bullish tilt, indicating that money is flowing into the asset but very weakly.

QWhat is the next major support level that the Pump.fun price might test if the negative sentiment continues?

AIf the negative sentiment continues, the Pump.fun price might slip to test the $0.0016 support level.

Leituras Relacionadas

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHá 9m

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHá 9m

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHá 9m

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHá 9m

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHá 13m

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHá 13m

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHá 59m

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHá 59m

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHá 1h

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PUMP

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Pump.fun (PUMP) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Pump.fun (PUMP) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Pump.fun (PUMP)Depois de comprar o teu Pump.fun (PUMP), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Pump.fun (PUMP)Transaciona facilmente Pump.fun (PUMP) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

421 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.07.09

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PUMP (PUMP) são apresentadas abaixo.