Psy Protocol Achieves 521,000 TPS on a Live Proof-of-Work Network, Offers $100,000 Bounty to Anyone Who Can Prove the Results Invalid

marsbitPublicado em 2026-02-14Última atualização em 2026-02-14

Hong Kong | February 11, 2026 — Psy Protocol today announced that it has achieved 521,000 transactions per second (TPS) on a live, on-chain verifiable Proof-of-Work (PoW) network. The team stated that this result, achieved without sacrificing decentralization, security, or privacy, surpasses all publicly benchmarked performances of mainstream Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Proof-of-Work chains to date.

The stress test was conducted on thousands of Google Cloud instances to simulate a high-concurrency, internet-scale operating environment. Every transaction in the benchmark is backed by cryptographic proof, and the complete dataset has been published for independent verification.

To demonstrate confidence in the results, Psy Protocol has publicly posted a $100,000 (US$100,000) bounty, to be awarded to any individual or team that can invalidate this throughput result based on the published proof materials.

"This is not a devnet demo, nor a theoretical projection," said Carter Feldman, Founder and CEO of Psy Protocol. "Every single result is verifiable. If we are wrong, the math will show it—and we will pay $100,000 to the person who shows it."

Why 521,000 TPS Matters Now

High-throughput benchmarks are not uncommon in the crypto industry. Psy Protocol believes this result is structurally significant because of the use-case context it addresses.

Blockchains were originally designed around human transaction patterns: sporadically occurring activities, manual approvals, and low concurrency. However, this model is becoming increasingly mismatched as millions of autonomous AI agents transact, collaborate, and settle at machine speeds continuously in the future.

When networks designed for human-scale usage encounter sustained machine-grade demand, the result is often network congestion, soaring fees, and cascading bottlenecks. Psy Protocol views 521,000 TPS as the "baseline" infrastructure required for a machine-native economy, not a performance ceiling.

How the Architecture Works

Most blockchains require every node to re-execute every transaction, a design that imposes a hard architectural ceiling on throughput. Psy Protocol removes this bottleneck through four synergistic design choices:

  • Parallel State Architecture (PARTH): Each user operates in isolated state partitions. This eliminates global state contention, allowing thousands of state transitions to be processed simultaneously without conflict.
  • Client-Side Proof Generation: Transaction execution and proof generation are performed on the user's device, with sensitive data always remaining under the user's control. Miners are only responsible for verifying and aggregating proofs, not re-executing transactions, thus eliminating redundant computation across the entire network.
  • Recursive Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Individual transaction proofs are recursively folded into a single succinct proof per block. As transaction volume grows, verification costs grow logarithmically rather than linearly, meaning massive throughput increases do not require proportional increases in resources.
  • Horizontal Scaling via Realms: The network scales by adding parallel processing domains ("Realms") and proof aggregation capacity. Throughput increases linearly with added infrastructure, rather than being limited by a fixed architectural cap.

Psy Protocol states that 521,000 TPS reflects the result in the current test configuration; higher throughput is achievable by scaling parallel proof generation capacity.

Verification: Open Data, Verifiable on Consumer Hardware

Because verification relies on succinct recursive proofs rather than full re-execution, Psy Protocol states that any combined proof from the benchmark can be independently verified on consumer-grade hardware—including limited-performance devices like a Raspberry Pi.

The complete test methodology, ZK circuit data, and combined proofs have all been open-sourced and are available at:

https://st8.psy.xyz/explorer

Applications Feasible at This Scale

With sustained throughput exceeding 500,000 TPS, the following new types of on-chain activity become feasible:

  • High-frequency micropayments between autonomous agents
  • Continuous clearing markets with real-time settlement replacing discrete batch settlement
  • High-density coordination among large-scale AI agent swarms operating without human intervention
  • Keyless agent execution via programmable signature circuits, eliminating reliance on human-controlled private keys or third-party custody

About Psy Protocol

Psy Protocol is building a Proof-of-Work smart contract platform for the "agentic internet." Its architecture combines the security and decentralization benefits of Proof-of-Work with the throughput and fee efficiency historically associated with Proof-of-Stake systems. Psy employs a "Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW)" consensus model, where miners perform cryptographically productive work—namely, aggregating and verifying zero-knowledge proofs—rather than arbitrary hash puzzle computations.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the TPS (Transactions Per Second) achieved by Psy Protocol in a real-world Proof-of-Work network, and what is the bounty offered for disproving this result?

APsy Protocol achieved 521,000 TPS in a real-world, verifiable Proof-of-Work network. They have offered a $100,000 bounty to anyone who can prove this result is invalid based on the published cryptographic proofs.

QAccording to the article, why is achieving 521,000 TPS particularly significant in the current context of blockchain technology?

AIt is significant because it addresses the future need for a 'machine-native economy.' Traditional blockchains designed for sporadic human transactions are inadequate for the continuous, high-speed transactions of millions of autonomous AI agents. This result represents a baseline for the infrastructure required to support such activity without congestion or high fees.

QName two of the four key architectural designs that Psy Protocol uses to remove the throughput bottleneck found in most blockchains.

ATwo of the four designs are: 1. Parallel State Architecture (PARTH), which isolates state partitions to eliminate global state contention, and 2. Client-side proof generation, where users execute transactions and generate proofs on their own devices, so miners only verify and aggregate proofs instead of re-executing transactions.

QHow can the results of Psy Protocol's benchmark test be independently verified, and what kind of hardware is sufficient for this verification?

AThe results can be independently verified using the complete test methodology, ZK circuit data, and composite proofs that have been open-sourced. This verification can be performed on consumer-grade hardware, including limited devices like a Raspberry Pi, because it relies on verifying succinct recursive proofs rather than fully re-executing all transactions.

QWhat type of consensus model does Psy Protocol use, and what useful work do the miners perform instead of solving arbitrary hash puzzles?

APsy Protocol uses a Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW) consensus model. Instead of performing arbitrary hash calculations, miners perform cryptographically productive work by aggregating and verifying zero-knowledge proofs.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 5m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 5m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 24m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 24m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 33m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 33m

Trading

Spot
活动图片